0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Townes-Brocks Syndrome Revealed by Kidney Gene Panel Testing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS), a rare autosomal dominant genetic condition associated with SALL1 (Spalt like Transcription Factor 1), is reported to be present in 1:238,000 individuals in the general population. TBS is characterized by the triad of anorectal malformations, dysplastic ears, with or without hearing impairment, and hand or thumb anomalies. Although kidney involvement is less common in TBS, the disease can progress to kidney failure. Here, we sought to characterize the incidence of SALL1 variants in individuals undergoing broad-based genetic testing with a kidney gene panel and to quantify the presence of (extra)renal features.

          Methods

          A retrospective analysis of the genetic data from a 385-gene panel identified cases with a pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in SALL1. Data including age, features, and disease progression were collected.

          Results

          Of 35,044 samples, P or LP variants in SALL1 were identified in 22, yielding a prevalence of 1:1592 among patients tested for monogenic kidney disease, and 1:342 among cases identified with a monogenic kidney disease. Among this cohort, the median patient age was 23 years (range: 3 months–62 years) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reported in 91% (20/22) of cases. Reported kidney features included renal agenesis/hypoplasia (7/22; 32%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (4/22; 18%), and kidney cysts (3/22; 14%). Confirmed extrarenal features included hearing loss and/or ear features (7/22; 32%), anorectal malformations (6/22; 27%) and hand or thumb abnormalities (4/22; 18%). Three patients (3/22; 14%) had both a priori TBS diagnoses and the traditional “triad.”

          Conclusion

          Traditionally, a molecular diagnosis was ascertained primarily in individuals presenting with cardinal features of TBS; therefore, individuals with mild or atypical presentations were often overlooked clinically. Our findings reveal that SALL1 P/LP variants could be a consequential contributor to monogenic kidney disease.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic Utility of Exome Sequencing for Kidney Disease

            Exome sequencing is emerging as a first-line diagnostic method in some clinical disciplines, but its usefulness has yet to be examined for most constitutional disorders in adults, including chronic kidney disease, which affects more than 1 in 10 persons globally.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease

              Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease. Methods We performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Results ES identified a molecular diagnosis in 80 (39%) patients, encompassing 35 distinct genetic disorders. Younger age at presentation was independently associated with an ES diagnosis (p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed, 31/80 (39%) had a change in their clinical diagnosis. ES diagnosis was considered to have contributed to management in 47/80 (59%), including negating the need for diagnostic renal biopsy in 10/80 (13%), changing surveillance in 35/80 (44%), and changing the treatment plan in 16/80 (20%). In cases with no change to management in the proband, the ES result had implications for the management of family members in 26/33 (79%). Cascade testing was subsequently offered to 40/80 families (50%). Conclusion In this pragmatic pediatric and adult cohort with suspected monogenic kidney disease, ES had high diagnostic and clinical utility. Our findings, including predictors of positive diagnosis, can be used to guide clinical practice and health service design.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney International Reports
                Elsevier
                2468-0249
                28 March 2024
                June 2024
                28 March 2024
                : 9
                : 6
                : 1810-1816
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Natera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA
                [2 ]Ochsner University Hospital and Clinics, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
                [3 ]Genomenon, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Quinn Stein, Natera Inc, 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, Texas 78753, USA. qstein@ 123456natera.com
                Article
                S2468-0249(24)01617-6
                10.1016/j.ekir.2024.03.030
                11184250
                38899216
                a83c96ef-58dd-4855-9d83-d297d1a58cf1
                © 2024 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 9 November 2023
                : 21 February 2024
                : 25 March 2024
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                genetic testing,kidney disease,reverse phenotyping,sall1,townes-brocks syndrome (tbs)

                Comments

                Comment on this article