32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10−5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P < .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma.

          Multiple myeloma cells uniformly overexpress CD38. We studied daratumumab, a CD38-targeting, human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody, in a phase 1-2 trial involving patients with relapsed myeloma or relapsed myeloma that was refractory to two or more prior lines of therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma.

            Daratumumab targets CD38-expressing myeloma cells through a variety of immune-mediated mechanisms (complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis) and direct apoptosis with crosslinking. These mechanisms may also target nonplasma cells that express CD38, which prompted evaluation of daratumumab's effects on CD38-positive immune subpopulations. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) from patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma from 2 daratumumab monotherapy studies were analyzed before and during therapy and at relapse. Regulatory B cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, previously shown to express CD38, were evaluated for immunosuppressive activity and daratumumab sensitivity in the myeloma setting. A novel subpopulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) expressing CD38 was identified. These Tregs were more immunosuppressive in vitro than CD38-negative Tregs and were reduced in daratumumab-treated patients. In parallel, daratumumab induced robust increases in helper and cytotoxic T-cell absolute counts. In PB and BM, daratumumab induced significant increases in CD8(+):CD4(+) and CD8(+):Treg ratios, and increased memory T cells while decreasing naïve T cells. The majority of patients demonstrated these broad T-cell changes, although patients with a partial response or better showed greater maximum effector and helper T-cell increases, elevated antiviral and alloreactive functional responses, and significantly greater increases in T-cell clonality as measured by T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. Increased TCR clonality positively correlated with increased CD8(+) PB T-cell counts. Depletion of CD38(+) immunosuppressive cells, which is associated with an increase in T-helper cells, cytotoxic T cells, T-cell functional response, and TCR clonality, represents possible additional mechanisms of action for daratumumab and deserves further exploration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Blood
                American Society of Hematology
                0006-4971
                1528-0020
                August 20 2020
                August 20 2020
                : 136
                : 8
                : 936-945
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC;
                [2 ]Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA;
                [3 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
                [4 ]Huntsman Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT;
                [5 ]Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC;
                [6 ]Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC;
                [7 ]Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY;
                [8 ]Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR;
                [9 ]University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL;
                [10 ]Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX;
                [11 ]Judy and Bernard Briskin Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA;
                [12 ]Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA;
                [13 ]The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH;
                [14 ]Division of Oncology & Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE;
                [15 ]Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA;
                [16 ]University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL;
                [17 ]Section of Medical Oncology, Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO;
                [18 ]Department of Lymphoma-Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
                [19 ]Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;
                [20 ]Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
                [21 ]Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA;
                [22 ]Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ;
                [23 ]Janssen Global Medical Affairs, Horsham, PA; and
                [24 ]Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Leiden, The Netherlands
                Article
                10.1182/blood.2020005288
                7441167
                32325490
                a7e2ea72-77e6-45c3-85d4-10c8001a9aba
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article