0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Parameters by Pentacam after Toric Implantable Phakic Contact lens (IPCL) Implantation in Moderate to High Myopia with Astigmatism

      , , ,
      The Open Ophthalmology Journal
      Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The toric IPCL is posterior phakic intraocular lens used for correction of moderate to high myopia with astigmatism, but after the implantation, there were changes in the parameters of the anterior chamber (AC).

          Purpose:

          The purpose of this study is to assess the parameters of the AC and lens vault after toric IPCL in patients with moderate to high myopia with astigmatism by Pentacam.

          Patients and Methods:

          In a prospective interventional case series, 30 eyes with moderate to high myopia with astigmatism were treated with toric IPCL implantation. Pentacam was done preoperatively, after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of toric IPCL implantation for evaluation of the AC parameters as the angle of the anterior chamber (ACA), depth of the anterior chamber (ACD) and volume of the anterior chamber (ACV). Also, the lens vault and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated.

          Results:

          The ACD was 3.3±0.1 mm preoperatively and changed to 2.5±0.1 mm after 1 month and remained stable at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (p-value =0.001). The ACV was 198.06±25.02 mm 3 preoperatively and reduced to 131.5±20.7, 131.8±21.4 and 131.5±20.2 mm 3 after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, respectively(p-value =0.001). The ACA was 42.9±4.1 preoperatively and changed to 26.7±4.3, 26.4±4.2 and 26.7±4.9 after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, respectively (p-value =0.001). The vault was 458±126.2 um after 1 month, 461±129.6 um after 3 months and 464.6±130.6 um after 6 months (p-value =0.005). The IOP was slightly high during the first month, then reduced to a level near the preoperative values during the second and third follow-up.

          Conclusion:

          The Pentacam was a useful tool for follow up of the AC parameters after toric IPCL implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia astigmatism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.

          To compare postoperative visual function after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with low to moderate myopia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus.

            To assess the repeatability and agreement of keratometry and pachymetry measurements obtained using 3 tomographers in eyes with keratoconus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.

              To compare postoperative visual function after implantable collamer lens (ICL; STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland) implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK) in eyes with high myopia. Retrospective, observational case study. We investigated 46 eyes of 33 patients undergoing ICL implantation and 47 eyes of 29 patients undergoing WFG-LASIK (Technolas217z; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) for the correction of high myopia (manifest spherical equivalent < or = -6 diopters). Ocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) function were measured by Hartmann-Shack aberrometry (KR-9000; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and a CS unit (VCTS-6500; Vistech Consultants Inc, Dayton, Ohio, USA) before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. From the CS, the area under the log CS function (AULCSF) was calculated. For a 4-mm pupil, the changes in ocular coma-like aberrations, spherical-like aberrations, and total HOAs after ICL implantation were significantly less than those after WFG-LASIK (P < .001, Mann-Whitney U test). The postoperative AULCSF was significantly increased after ICL implantation (P < .001), whereas after WFG-LASIK, it was significantly decreased (P < .001). ICL implantation induces significantly fewer ocular HOAs than WFG-LASIK. Moreover, CS was improved significantly after ICL implantation, but deteriorated after WFG-LASIK in eyes with high myopia. Thus, in the correction of high myopia, ICL implantation seems to be superior in visual performance to WFG-LASIK, suggesting that it may be a better surgical option for the treatment of such eyes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Open Ophthalmology Journal
                TOOPHTJ
                Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
                1874-3641
                October 31 2022
                October 31 2022
                : 16
                : 1
                Article
                10.2174/18743641-v16-e2208200
                a7ad51a6-0955-4e65-a15e-328f6d127ccf
                © 2022

                Free to read

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

                History

                Medicine,Chemistry,Life sciences
                Medicine, Chemistry, Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article