1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      KindMap: an e-mental health tool to promote the well-being and mental health of people facing infertility—study protocol for a feasibility randomised control trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Fertility patients increasingly use web-based and mobile-based apps to access psychosocial care. These digital tools may be a helpful alternative to traditional psychological interventions. Developing and evaluating patient-centred e-mental health tools rooted in evidence-based interventions is a priority. The KindMap is a stand-alone, cost-free e-mental health intervention derived from adapting the Mindfulness Based Programme for Infertility (MBPI) contents to a digital format. The KindMap integrates mindfulness and self-compassion skills training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy components. This protocol is intended to evaluate the KindMap’s feasibility and explore the extent to which the web-app mode of delivery limited efficacy results are similar to the MBPI in-person format results. Furthermore, it will test the causal theory underlying KindMap.

          Methods and analysis

          A two-arm 2:1 non-blinded feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. Participants are people dealing with infertility, who are able to access the Internet and understand Portuguese or English. Consent participants will complete an online survey at 3-time assessment moments. After baseline assessment, participants will be randomised into the KindMap experimental group (KindMap-EG; with immediate access to the web app) or the waiting-list control group. The primary outcome is well-being (WHO Index-5); secondary outcomes are infertility-related stress (Fertility Problem Inventory—Short Form), anxiety and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety-4); mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire—Short Form), self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale—Short Form), psychological flexibility (Psy-Flex) and infertility-related self-efficacy are the potential mechanisms of change. KindMap-EG will also complete a feasibility survey.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra (Identifier: CEDI/FPCEUC:78/R_10). The KindMap study may contribute to the existing research on e-health technologies applied to mental health. The study outcomes will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and national and international conference presentations.

          Trial registration number

          NCT05899374.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

          Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

            Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

              The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2024
                09 December 2024
                : 14
                : 12
                : e087447
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Instituto Superior Miguel Torga , Coimbra, Portugal
                [2 ]departmentCINEICC—Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [3 ]departmentSchool of Psychology , Cardiff University , Cardiff, UK
                Author notes

                Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

                None declared.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-1737
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-2004
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-6683
                Article
                bmjopen-2024-087447
                10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087447
                11628952
                39653558
                a7689a89-f32e-4249-b5fd-3d45cde781db
                Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 April 2024
                : 20 November 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology);
                Award ID: 2022.13895
                Categories
                Protocol
                Mental Health
                1712
                1506

                Medicine
                mental health,ehealth,feasibility studies,psychosocial intervention,reproductive medicine,self-help devices

                Comments

                Comment on this article