6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ecological signal in the size and shape of marine amniote teeth

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Amniotes have been a major component of marine trophic chains from the beginning of the Triassic to present day, with hundreds of species. However, inferences of their (palaeo)ecology have mostly been qualitative, making it difficult to track how dietary niches have changed through time and across clades. Here, we tackle this issue by applying a novel geometric morphometric protocol to three-dimensional models of tooth crowns across a wide range of raptorial marine amniotes. Our results highlight the phenomenon of dental simplification and widespread convergence in marine amniotes, limiting the range of tooth crown morphologies. Importantly, we quantitatively demonstrate that tooth crown shape and size are strongly associated with diet, whereas crown surface complexity is not. The maximal range of tooth shapes in both mammals and reptiles is seen in medium-sized taxa; large crowns are simple and restricted to a fraction of the morphospace. We recognize four principal raptorial guilds within toothed marine amniotes (durophages, generalists, flesh cutters and flesh piercers). Moreover, even though all these feeding guilds have been convergently colonized over the last 200 Myr, a series of dental morphologies are unique to the Mesozoic period, probably reflecting a distinct ecosystem structure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers

          Tertiary and Recent marine gastropods include in their ranks a complement of mechanically sturdy forms unknown in earlier epochs. Open coiling, planispiral coiling, and umbilici detract from shell sturdiness, and were commoner among Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic gastropods than among younger forms. Strong external sculpture, narrow elongate apertures, and apertural dentition promote resistance to crushing predation and are primarily associated with post-Jurassic mesogastropods, neogastropods, and neritaceans. The ability to remodel the interior of the shell, developed primarily in gastropods with a non-nacreous shell structure, has contributed greatly to the acquisition of these antipredatory features.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B.
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                September 14 2022
                September 14 2022
                September 14 2022
                : 289
                : 1982
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Evolution and Diversity Dynamics Lab, Université de Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium
                [2 ]Palaeobiosphere Evolution, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK
                [4 ]School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
                [5 ]Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
                [6 ]Functional Morphology Lab, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen 2610, Belgium
                [7 ]Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
                [8 ]Earth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences (BEES), University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia
                [9 ]Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA
                [10 ]Engineering and Science Division, Rose State College, Midwest City, OK 73110, USA
                [11 ]Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
                [12 ]CR2P, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie–Paris, CNRS-MNHN-SU, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 75005, France
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2022.1214
                36100016
                a7605935-803e-4e16-936f-a8884a772577
                © 2022

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article