21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differential Effects of Dorsal and Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex Inactivation during Natural Reward Seeking, Extinction, and Cue-Induced Reinstatement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rodent dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), typically prelimbic cortex, is often described as promoting actions such as reward seeking, whereas ventral mPFC, typically infralimbic cortex, is thought to promote response inhibition. However, both dorsal and ventral mPFC are necessary for both expression and suppression of different behaviors, and each region may contribute to different functions depending on the specifics of the behavior tested. To better understand the roles of dorsal and ventral mPFC in motivated behavior we pharmacologically inactivated each area during operant fixed ratio 1 (FR1) seeking for a natural reward (sucrose), extinction, cue-induced reinstatement, and progressive ratio (PR) sucrose seeking in male Long–Evans rats. Bilateral inactivation of dorsal mPFC, but not ventral mPFC increased reward seeking during FR1. Inactivation of both dorsal and ventral mPFC decreased seeking during extinction. Bilateral inactivation of ventral mPFC, but not dorsal mPFC decreased reward seeking during cue-induced reinstatement. No effect of inactivation was found during PR. Our data contrast sharply with observations seen during drug seeking and fear conditioning, indicating that previously established roles of dorsal mPFC = going versus ventral mPFC = stopping are not applicable to all motivated behaviors and/or outcomes. Our results indicate that dichotomous functions of dorsal versus ventral mPFC, if they exist, may align better with other models, or may require the development of a new framework in which these multifaceted brain areas play different roles in action control depending on the behavioral context in which they are engaged.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making.

          Some have claimed that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates decision making. Others suggest mPFC is selectively involved in the retrieval of remote long-term memory. Yet others suggests mPFC supports memory and consolidation on time scales ranging from seconds to days. How can all these roles be reconciled? We propose that the function of the mPFC is to learn associations between context, locations, events, and corresponding adaptive responses, particularly emotional responses. Thus, the ubiquitous involvement of mPFC in both memory and decision making may be due to the fact that almost all such tasks entail the ability to recall the best action or emotional response to specific events in a particular place and time. An interaction between multiple memory systems may explain the changing importance of mPFC to different types of memories over time. In particular, mPFC likely relies on the hippocampus to support rapid learning and memory consolidation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear.

            Current models of conditioned fear expression and extinction involve the basolateral amygdala (BLA), ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and the hippocampus (HPC). There is some disagreement with respect to the specific roles of these structures, perhaps due to subregional differences within each area. For example, growing evidence suggests that infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) subregions of vmPFC have opposite influences on fear expression. Moreover, it is the ventral HPC (vHPC), rather than the dorsal HPC, that projects to vmPFC and BLA. To help determine regional specificity, we used small doses of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol to selectively inactivate IL, PL, BLA, or vHPC in an auditory fear conditioning and extinction paradigm. Infusions were performed prior to extinction training, allowing us to assess the effects on both fear expression and subsequent extinction memory. Inactivation of IL had no effect on fear expression, but impaired the within-session acquisition of extinction as well as extinction memory. In contrast, inactivation of PL impaired fear expression, but had no effect on extinction memory. Inactivation of the BLA or vHPC impaired both fear expression and extinction memory. Post-extinction inactivations had no effect in any structure. We suggest a model in which amygdala-dependent fear expression is modulated by inputs from PL and vHPC, whereas extinction memory requires extinction-induced plasticity in IL, BLA, and/or vHPC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prefrontal–hippocampal interactions in episodic memory

              The prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus have distinct and complementary roles in episodic memory, and their interactions are also crucial for memory. Eichenbaum describes the pathways and mechanisms mediating these interactions and suggests a model of how these regions communicate to retrieve cued memories.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                13 September 2019
                25 September 2019
                Sep-Oct 2019
                : 6
                : 5
                : ENEURO.0296-19.2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program
                [2 ]Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, MA 01003
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: J.P.C., G.B.S., L.R.-H., and D.E.M. designed research; J.P.C., G.B.S., and L.R.-H. performed research; J.P.C., G.B.S., L.R.-H., and D.E.M. analyzed data; J.P.C., G.B.S., L.R.-H., and D.E.M. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Research Grants AA024571, AA025481, and DA041674; a National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia & Depression Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (D.E.M.); National Institutes of Health Research Grant NS082179 (L.R.-H.), and STEM Diversity Institute (SDI) Grant S1111000000063 (J.P.C.).

                Correspondence should be addressed to David E. Moorman at moorman@ 123456umass.edu .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-034X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-0789
                Article
                eN-CFN-0296-19
                10.1523/ENEURO.0296-19.2019
                6763834
                31519696
                a7356f45-f727-4477-af11-adaa2f087fc4
                Copyright © 2019 Caballero et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 29 July 2019
                : 24 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 13, Words: 9700
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000027HHS | NIH | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
                Award ID: AA024571
                Award ID: AA025481
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000026HHS | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
                Award ID: DA041674
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000874Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Brain & Behavior Research Foundation)
                Award ID: NARSAD
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000065HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
                Award ID: NS082179
                Funded by: SDI-STEM Diversity Institute
                Award ID: S111100000006
                Categories
                1
                1.6
                Confirmation
                Cognition and Behavior
                Custom metadata
                September/October 2019

                frontal,infralimbic,learning,prelimbic,self-administration,sucrose

                Comments

                Comment on this article