7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Soybean resilience to drought is supported by partial recovery of photosynthetic traits

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Climate change affects precipitation dynamics and the variability of drought frequency, intensity, timing, and duration. This represents a high risk in spring-sown grain legumes such as soybean. Yet, under European conditions, no evidence supports the potential recovery and resilience of drought-tolerant soybean cultivars after episodic drought, at different growth stages. A field experiment was conducted using a representative drought-tolerant cultivar of soybean (cv. Acardia), in 2020 and 2021, on sandy soils in Germany, applying four water regimes (irrigated, rainfed, early-drought, and late-drought stress). Drought stress was simulated by covering the plots during the event of rain with 6 × 6 m rainout shelters, at the vegetative (V-stage) and flowering (Fl-stage) stages. Drought response was quantified on plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (ChlF ratio), chlorophyll content (Chlc), and leaf surface temperature (LST), at different intervals after simulating drought until pod filling. Grain yield and yield components were quantified at the end of the growing season. Compared to rainfed conditions, a drought at V-stage and Fl-stage reduced significantly plant height, ChlF ratio, and Chlc by 20%, 11%, and 7%, respectively, but increased LST by 21% during the recovery phase. There was no recovery from drought except for Chlc after V-stage in 2021, that significantly recovered by 40% at the end of the growing season, signifying a partial recovery of the photochemical apparatus. Especially, there was no recovery observed in LST, implying the inability of soybean to restore LST within the physiological functional range ( Graphical abstract ). Under rainfed conditions, the grain yield reached 2.9 t ha -1 in 2020 and 5.2 t ha -1 in 2021. However, the episodic drought reduced the yield at V-stage and Fl-stage, by 63% and 25% in 2020, and 21% and 36% in 2021, respectively. To conclude, the timing of drought was less relevant for soybean resilience; however, pre- and post-drought soil moisture, drought intensity, and drought duration were likely more important. A drought-tolerant soybean cultivar may partially be drought-resilient due to the recovery of photosynthetic traits, but not the leaf thermal traits. Overall, these findings will accelerate future efforts by plant breeders, aimed at improving soybean drought resilience.

          Graphical Abstract

          Experimental design for soybean (Glycine max L.; cv. Acardia) grown in a field experiment at ZALF under four water regimes (irrigated, rainfed (control), early-drought, and late-drought stress), and main results on resilience to drought for Chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (ChlF ratio), Chlorophyll content (Chlc), leaf surface temperature (LST), and grain yield during the vegetative stage (V-stage) and flowering stage (Fl-stage).

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?

            Background Pseudoreplication occurs when observations are not statistically independent, but treated as if they are. This can occur when there are multiple observations on the same subjects, when samples are nested or hierarchically organised, or when measurements are correlated in time or space. Analysis of such data without taking these dependencies into account can lead to meaningless results, and examples can easily be found in the neuroscience literature. Results A single issue of Nature Neuroscience provided a number of examples and is used as a case study to highlight how pseudoreplication arises in neuroscientific studies, why the analyses in these papers are incorrect, and appropriate analytical methods are provided. 12% of papers had pseudoreplication and a further 36% were suspected of having pseudoreplication, but it was not possible to determine for certain because insufficient information was provided. Conclusions Pseudoreplication can undermine the conclusions of a statistical analysis, and it would be easier to detect if the sample size, degrees of freedom, the test statistic, and precise p-values are reported. This information should be a requirement for all publications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                20 October 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 971893
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) , Müncheberg, Germany
                [2] 2 Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences - Crop Science, Humboldt-University of Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3 Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University , Assiut, Egypt
                [4] 4 Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) , Uppsala, Sweden
                Author notes

                Edited by: Carmen Arena, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

                Reviewed by: Kourosh Vahdati, University of Tehran, Iran; Abbu Zaid, Govt. Degree College Doda, India; Veysel Turan, Bingöl University, Turkey

                *Correspondence: Heba H. Elsalahy, heba.elsalahy@ 123456zalf.de

                This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2022.971893
                9632626
                36340420
                a6ab2e2a-7fad-4851-a198-9b86f2187f28
                Copyright © 2022 Elsalahy and Reckling

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 June 2022
                : 03 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 1, References: 59, Pages: 17, Words: 9987
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                drought,leaf thermal recovery,photosynthetic recovery,resilience,soil moisture,soybean

                Comments

                Comment on this article