74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes With the Mediterranean Diet : Results of the PREDIMED-Reus nutrition intervention randomized trial

      research-article
      , MD, PHD 1 , 2 , , BSC, PHD 1 , 2 , , BSC, PHD 1 , 2 , , MD, PHD 2 , 3 , , RD 1 , 2 , , MD 1 , 2 , 4 , , MD, PHD 2 , 5 , , DPHARM, PHD 2 , 6 , , DPHARM, PHD 2 , 7 , , MD, PHD 2 , 8 , , DPHARM, PHD 9 , , MD, PHD 2 , 10 , for the PREDIMED Study Investigators
      Diabetes Care
      American Diabetes Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          To test the effects of two Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) interventions versus a low-fat diet on incidence of diabetes.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          This was a three-arm randomized trial in 418 nondiabetic subjects aged 55–80 years recruited in one center (PREDIMED-Reus, northeastern Spain) of the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea [PREDIMED] study, a large nutrition intervention trial for primary cardiovascular prevention in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Participants were randomly assigned to education on a low-fat diet (control group) or to one of two MedDiets, supplemented with either free virgin olive oil (1 liter/week) or nuts (30 g/day). Diets were ad libitum, and no advice on physical activity was given. The main outcome was diabetes incidence diagnosed by the 2009 American Diabetes Association criteria.

          RESULTS

          After a median follow-up of 4.0 years, diabetes incidence was 10.1% (95% CI 5.1–15.1), 11.0% (5.9–16.1), and 17.9% (11.4–24.4) in the MedDiet with olive oil group, the MedDiet with nuts group, and the control group, respectively. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios of diabetes were 0.49 (0.25–0.97) and 0.48 (0.24–0.96) in the MedDiet supplemented with olive oil and nuts groups, respectively, compared with the control group. When the two MedDiet groups were pooled and compared with the control group, diabetes incidence was reduced by 52% (27–86). In all study arms, increased adherence to the MedDiet was inversely associated with diabetes incidence. Diabetes risk reduction occurred in the absence of significant changes in body weight or physical activity.

          CONCLUSIONS

          MedDiets without calorie restriction seem to be effective in the prevention of diabetes in subjects at high cardiovascular risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study.

            Individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) have a high risk of developing NIDDM. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diet and exercise interventions in those with IGT may delay the development of NIDDM, i.e., reduce the incidence of NIDDM, and thereby reduce the overall incidence of diabetic complications, such as cardiovascular, renal, and retinal disease, and the excess mortality attributable to these complications. In 1986, 110,660 men and women from 33 health care clinics in the city of Da Qing, China, were screened for IGT and NIDDM. Of these individuals, 577 were classified (using World Health Organization criteria) as having IGT. Subjects were randomized by clinic into a clinical trial, either to a control group or to one of three active treatment groups: diet only, exercise only, or diet plus exercise. Follow-up evaluation examinations were conducted at 2-year intervals over a 6-year period to identify subjects who developed NIDDM. Cox's proportional hazard analysis was used to determine if the incidence of NIDDM varied by treatment assignment. The cumulative incidence of diabetes at 6 years was 67.7% (95% CI, 59.8-75.2) in the control group compared with 43.8% (95% CI, 35.5-52.3) in the diet group, 41.1% (95% CI, 33.4-49.4) in the exercise group, and 46.0% (95% CI, 37.3-54.7) in the diet-plus-exercise group (P or = 25 kg/m2). In a proportional hazards analysis adjusted for differences in baseline BMI and fasting glucose, the diet, exercise, and diet-plus-exercise interventions were associated with 31% (P < 0.03), 46% (P < 0.0005), and 42% (P < 0.005) reductions in risk of developing diabetes, respectively. Diet and/or exercise interventions led to a significant decrease in the incidence of diabetes over a 6-year period among those with IGT.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

              (2008)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                January 2011
                7 October 2010
                : 34
                : 1
                : 14-19
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Human Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain;
                [2] 2CIBER Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain;
                [3] 3Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain;
                [4] 4SAP Reus-Altebrat, Institut Català de la Salut, Reus, Spain;
                [5] 5Department of Internal Medicine, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain;
                [6] 6Cardiovascular Risk and Nutrition Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica, Barcelona, Spain;
                [7] 7Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;
                [8] 8Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Txagorritxu, Vitoria, Spain;
                [9] 9Instituto de la Grasa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain;
                [10] 10Lipid Clinic, Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jordi Salas-Salvadó, jordi.salas@ 123456urv.cat .
                Article
                1288
                10.2337/dc10-1288
                3005482
                20929998
                a6915906-2708-466c-ad2b-662d54bd98b7
                © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

                History
                : 6 July 2010
                : 28 September 2010
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article