0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Foot Pronation Prediction with Inertial Sensors during Running: A Preliminary Application of Data-Driven Approaches

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abnormal foot postures may affect foot movement and joint loading during locomotion. Investigating foot posture alternation during running could contribute to injury prevention and foot mechanism study. This study aimed to develop feature-based and deep learning algorithms to predict foot pronation during prolonged running. Thirty-two recreational runners have been recruited for this study. Nine-axial inertial sensors were attached to the right dorsum of the foot and the vertical axis of the distal anteromedial tibia. This study employed feature-based machine learning algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest, and deep learning, i.e., one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNN1D), to predict foot pronation. A custom nested k-fold cross-validation was designed for hyper-parameter tuning and validating the model’s performance. The XGBoot classifier achieved the best accuracy using acceleration and angular velocity data from the foot dorsum as input. Accuracy and the area under curve (AUC) were 74.7 ± 5.2% and 0.82 ± 0.07 for the subject-independent model and 98 ± 0.4% and 0.99 ± 0 for the record-wise method. The test accuracy of the CNN1D model with sensor data at the foot dorsum was 74 ± 3.8% for the subject-wise approach with an AUC of 0.8 ± 0.05. This study found that these algorithms, specifically for the CNN1D and XGBoost model with inertial sensor data collected from the foot dorsum, could be implemented into wearable devices, such as a smartwatch, for monitoring a runner’s foot pronation during long-distance running. It has the potential for running shoe matching and reducing or preventing foot posture-induced injuries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition

          Human activity recognition (HAR) tasks have traditionally been solved using engineered features obtained by heuristic processes. Current research suggests that deep convolutional neural networks are suited to automate feature extraction from raw sensor inputs. However, human activities are made of complex sequences of motor movements, and capturing this temporal dynamics is fundamental for successful HAR. Based on the recent success of recurrent neural networks for time series domains, we propose a generic deep framework for activity recognition based on convolutional and LSTM recurrent units, which: (i) is suitable for multimodal wearable sensors; (ii) can perform sensor fusion naturally; (iii) does not require expert knowledge in designing features; and (iv) explicitly models the temporal dynamics of feature activations. We evaluate our framework on two datasets, one of which has been used in a public activity recognition challenge. Our results show that our framework outperforms competing deep non-recurrent networks on the challenge dataset by 4% on average; outperforming some of the previous reported results by up to 9%. Our results show that the framework can be applied to homogeneous sensor modalities, but can also fuse multimodal sensors to improve performance. We characterise key architectural hyperparameters’ influence on performance to provide insights about their optimisation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index.

            The limitations of clinical methods for appraising foot posture are well documented. A new measure, the Foot Posture Index is proposed, and its development and validation described. A four-phase development process was used: (i) to derive a series of candidate measures, (ii) to define an appropriate scoring system, (iii) to evaluate the validity of components and modify the instrument as appropriate, and (iv) to investigate the predictive validity of the finalised instrument relative to static and dynamic kinematic models. Methods included initial concurrent validation using Rose's Valgus Index, determination of inter-item reliability, factor analysis, and benchmarking against three dimensional kinematic models derived from electromagnetic motion tracking of the lower limb. Thirty-six candidate components were reduced to six in the final instrument. The draft version of the instrument predicted 59% of the variance in concurrent Valgus Index scores and demonstrated good inter item reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). The relevant variables from the motion tracking lower limb model predicted 58-80% of the variance in the six components retained in the final instrument. The finalised instrument predicted 64% of the variance in static standing posture, and 41% of the variance in midstance posture during normal walking. The Foot Posture Index has been subjected to thorough evaluation in the course of its development and a final version is proposed comprising six component measures that performed satisfactorily during the validation process. The Foot Posture Index assessment is quick and simple to perform and allows a multiple segment, multiple plane evaluation that offers some advantages over existing clinical measures of foot posture.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Normative values for the Foot Posture Index

              Background The Foot Posture Index (FPI) is a validated method for quantifying standing foot posture, and is being used in a variety of clinical settings. There have however, been no normative data available to date for comparison and reference. This study aimed to establish normative FPI reference values. Methods Studies reporting FPI data were identified by searching online databases. Nine authors contributed anonymised versions of their original datasets comprising 1648 individual observations. The datasets included information relating to centre, age, gender, pathology (if relevant), FPI scores and body mass index (BMI) where available. FPI total scores were transformed to interval logit scores as per the Rasch model and normal ranges were defined. Comparisons between groups employed t-tests or ANOVA models as appropriate and data were explored descriptively and graphically. Results The main analysis based on a normal healthy population (n = 619) confirmed that a slightly pronated foot posture is the normal position at rest (mean back transformed FPI raw score = +4). A 'U' shaped relationship existed for age, with minors and older adults exhibiting significantly higher FPI scores than the general adult population (F = 51.07, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the FPI scores of males and females (2.3 versus 2.5; t = -1.44, p = 0.149). No relationship was found between the FPI and BMI. Systematic differences from the adult normals were confirmed in patients with neurogenic and idiopathic cavus (F = 216.981, p < 0.001), indicating some sensitivity of the instrument to detect a posturally pathological population. Conclusion A set of population norms for children, adults and older people have been derived from a large sample. Foot posture is related to age and the presence of pathology, but not influenced by gender or BMI. The normative values identified may assist in classifying foot type for the purpose of research and clinical decision making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hum Kinet
                J Hum Kinet
                JHK
                Journal of Human Kinetics
                Termedia Publishing House
                1640-5544
                1899-7562
                15 July 2023
                July 2023
                : 87
                : 29-40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
                [2 ]Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
                [3 ]Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
                [4 ]Faculty of Engineering, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.
                [5 ]Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: guyaodong@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-2244
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-9440
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-4287
                Article
                163059
                10.5114/jhk/163059
                10407326
                a658a4aa-d592-4013-a347-6cb13e7c6d32
                Copyright: © Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.

                History
                : 07 November 2022
                : 01 March 2023
                Categories
                Research Paper

                foot pronation,running,inertial measurement sensors (imu),machine learning,one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (cnn1d)

                Comments

                Comment on this article