11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Diabetes in the US

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are there inequities in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use based on race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status among patients with diabetes in the US?

          Findings

          This 5-year cohort study of 1 180 260 commercially insured patients with diabetes in the US found that GLP-1 RA use increased but use remained low. Lower rates of GLP-1 RA use were found among Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals and among those with lower household income; results were similar among patients with diabetes who also had cardiovascular disease.

          Meaning

          The findings of this cohort study suggest that racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities are present in access to GLP-1 RA, a medication with established benefits for improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Randomized clinical trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) cause significant weight loss and reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Black patients have a disproportionate burden of obesity and cardiovascular disease and have a higher rate of cardiovascular-related mortality. Racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes are largely attributable to the pervasiveness of structural racism, and patients who are marginalized by racism have less access to novel therapeutics.

          Objectives

          To evaluate GLP-1 RA uptake among a commercially insured population of patients with T2D; identify associations of race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status with GLP-1 RA use; and specifically examine its use among the subgroup of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) because of the known benefit of GLP-1 RA use for this population.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This was a retrospective cohort analysis using data from OptumInsight Clinformatics Data Mart of commercially insured adult patients with T2D (with or without ASCVD) in the US. Data from October 1, 2015, to June 31, 2019, were included, and the analyses were performed in July 2020. We estimated multivariable logistic regression models to identify the association of race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status with GLP-1 RA use.

          Main Outcome and Measure

          A prescription for a GLP-1 RA.

          Results

          Of the 1 180 260 patients with T2D (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-76] years; 50.3% female; 57.7% White), 90 934 (7.7%) were treated with GLP-1 RA during the study period. From 2015 to 2019, the percentage of T2D patients treated with an GLP-1 RA increased from 3.2% to 10.7%. Among patients with T2D and ASCVD, use also increased but remained low (2.8%-9.4%). In multivariable analyses, lower rates of GLP-1 RA use were found among Asian (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62), Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.83), and Hispanic (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93) patients with T2D. Female sex (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24) and higher zip code–linked median household incomes (>$100 000 [OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.16] and $50 000-$99 999 [OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09] vs <$50 000) were associated with higher GLP-1 RA use. These results were similar to those found among patients with ASCVD.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study of US patients with T2D, GLP-1 RA use increased, but remained low overall for treatment of T2D, particularly among patients with ASCVD who are likely to derive the most benefit. Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients and those with low income were less likely to receive treatment with a GLP-1 RA. Strategies to lower barriers to GLP-1 RA use, such as lower cost, are needed to prevent the widening of well-documented inequities in cardiovascular disease outcomes in the US.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the racial, ethnic, sex, and socioeconomic inequities associated with use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in US patients with type 2 diabetes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

          Circulation, 135(10)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

            The cardiovascular effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, when added to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes, remains unknown.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

              Regulatory guidance specifies the need to establish cardiovascular safety of new diabetes therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes in order to rule out excess cardiovascular risk. The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week, in type 2 diabetes are unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Health Forum
                JAMA Health Forum
                JAMA Health Forum
                American Medical Association
                2689-0186
                17 December 2021
                December 2021
                17 December 2021
                : 2
                : 12
                : e214182
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [2 ]Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [3 ]Penn Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity and Social Justice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [4 ]Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [5 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [6 ]Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [7 ]Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [8 ]Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [9 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 20, 2021.
                Published: December 17, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4182
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Eberly LA et al. JAMA Health Forum.
                Corresponding Author: Lauren A. Eberly, MD, MPH, Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19146 ( lauren.eberly@ 123456pennmedicine.upenn.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Eberly and Adusumalli had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Eberly, Nathan, Giri, Groeneveld, Adusumalli.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Eberly, Yang, Essien, Eneanya, Julien, Luo, Khatana, Dayoub, Fanaroff, Adusumalli.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Eberly, Essien, Adusumalli.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Eberly, Yang.
                Obtained funding: Groeneveld.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Eberly, Dayoub, Giri, Groeneveld, Adusumalli.
                Supervision: Julien, Luo, Giri, Groeneveld, Adusumalli.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Essien reported grants from Department of Veterans Affairs (No. CDA-30-049) outside the submitted work. Dr Eneanya reported personal fees from Somatus and Davita outside the submitted work. Dr Luo reported grants from NCATS, NIDDK, and NIDA during the conduct of the study; and consulting fees from Health Action International and Alosa Health outside the submitted work. Dr Khatana reported grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (No. 5K23HL153772-02) and the American Heart Association (No. 20CDA35320251) during the conduct of the study. Dr Fanaroff reported grants from the American Heart Association and consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Giri reported consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Inari Medical, and Boston Scientific; and grants from Inari Medical and Boston Scientific, all outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The study was internally funded by the Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research (CAVOQER) Center.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                aoi210067
                10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4182
                8796881
                35977298
                a5ca4713-3b3f-441c-aa31-9067968052fa
                Copyright 2021 Eberly LA et al. JAMA Health Forum.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 28 August 2021
                : 20 October 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content151

                Cited by37

                Most referenced authors2,597