25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Validity of the Problem Gambling Severity Index interpretive categories.

      Journal of Gambling Studies
      Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Canada, Female, Gambling, psychology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) is a widely used nine item scale for measuring the severity of gambling problems in the general population. Of the four gambler types defined by the PGSI, non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk and problem gamblers, only the latter category underwent any validity testing during the scale's development, despite the fact that over 95% of gamblers fall into one of the remaining three categories. Using Canadian population data on over 25,000 gamblers, we conducted a comprehensive validity and reliability analysis of the four PGSI gambler types. The temporal stability of PGSI subtype over a 14-month interval was modest but adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). There was strong evidence for the validity of the non-problem and problem gambler categories however the low-risk and moderate-risk categories showed poor discriminant validity using the existing scoring rules. The validity of these categories was improved with a simple modification to the scoring system.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          22426971
          10.1007/s10899-012-9300-6

          Chemistry
          Adolescent,Adult,Aged,Canada,Female,Gambling,psychology,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Reproducibility of Results,Severity of Illness Index,Young Adult

          Comments

          Comment on this article