Flexibility is defined as the maximal physiological passive range of motion (ROM) in a given joint movement and it is specific for joints and movements which justify why several movements and joints should be included in the evaluation of body flexibility. Developed by Dr. Claudio Gil Araújo in late 70's, the Flexitest, an assessment tool for evaluating the maximal passive ROM in 20 body movements (7 joints), was utilized in this study. Flexitest is safe, simple to apply and no equipment is required for its application but only the availability of the evaluation maps. Each movement is scored from 0 to 4 by a visual comparison between the maximal passive ROM obtained by the evaluator and the evaluation maps (scores increase for higher mobility) (see an example in the figure 1 of the study - thumbnail). When the amplitude reaches position 2 on the map, score 2 is given until the maximum ROM reaches the level of score 3.
A Youtube 1-min Flexitest's demo video is freely available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDt8xm3jBqc
FLEXITEST: STUDY’S MAIN IMPLICATIONS
Flexibility is finally confirmed as a health-related physical fitness variable, since it is related to the most objective and relevant health outcome – natural mortality;
More attention and emphasis should be given to flexibility exercises;
There is a need to evaluate the passive ROM in several joint movements (Flexitest is likely the best available option) to generate an individualized prescription of flexibility or stretching exercises.
Flexibility is recognized as one of the components of physical fitness and commonly included as part of exercise prescriptions for all ages. However, limited data exist regarding the relationship between flexibility and survival. We evaluated the sex‐specific nature and magnitude of the associations between body flexibility and natural and non‐COVID‐19 mortality in a middle‐aged cohort of men and women.
Anthropometric, health and vital data from 3139 (66% men) individuals aged 46–65 years spanning from March 1994 to October 2022 were available. A body flexibility score, termed Flexindex, was derived from a combination of 20 movements (scored 0–4) involving seven different joints, resulting in a score range of 0–80. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were obtained, and unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality estimated.
During a mean follow‐up of 12.9 years, 302 individuals (9.6%) comprising 224 men/78 women died. Flexindex was 35% higher in women compared to men (mean ± SD: 41.1 ± 9.4 vs. 30.5 ± 8.7; p < 0.001) and exhibited an inverse relationship with mortality risk in both sexes ( p < 0.001). Following adjustment for age, body mass index, and health status, the HR (95% CI) for mortality comparing upper and bottom of distributions of Flexindex were 1.87 (1.50–2.33; p < 0.001) for men and 4.78 (1.23–31.71; p = 0.047) for women.
A component of physical fitness—body flexibility—as assessed by the Flexindex is strongly and inversely associated with natural and non‐COVID‐19 mortality risk in middle‐aged men and women. Future studies should assess whether training‐induced flexibility gains are related to longer survival.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.