Long‐term stability and characteristics of behavioral, biochemical, and molecular markers of three different rodent models for depression

Abstract

Objective

The present study was designed to explore the long‐term differences between three mouse models for depression.

Method

In the present study, the unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) model, the glucocorticoid/corticosterone model, and the olfactory bulbectomy model were compared at two, three, and five weeks after model induction. Behavioral testing performed included forced‐swimming, tail suspension, open‐field and elevated plus‐maze tests. In addition, 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT) and dopamine levels, and mRNA and protein expressions related to 5‐HT synthesis, transport, and signaling were analyzed in the hippocampus of tested animals.

Results

Our results revealed that each model demonstrated a specific profile of markers, whereas the stability of them differed over testing time.

Conclusions

Each model provided a unique set of advantages that can be considered depending on the context and aims of each study. Among the three models, the UCMS model was mostly stable and appeared to the best model for testing long‐term depression‐like state.

Abstract

There were varied degrees of change from behavior to molecular levels in the three models of depressive mice throughout the length of the modeling time. This includes an evaluation of the time period to be investigated when testing new antidepressants.