16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel and oxaliplatin + S-1 and standard S-1 and oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimens for treatment of gastric cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Gastric cancer (GC) is a relatively frequent clinical phenomenon, referring to malignant tumors emerging in the gastric mucosal epithelial cells. It has a high morbidity and mortality rate, posing a significant threat to the health of patients. Hence, how to diagnose and treat GC has become a heated topic in this research field.

          AIM

          To discuss the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel in combination with oxaliplatin and S-1 (P-SOX) for the treatment of GC, and to analyze the factors that may influence its outcomes.

          METHODS

          A total of 219 eligible patients with advanced GC, who were treated at Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital Gastrointestinal Oncology between January 2018 and March 2020, were included in the study. Among them, 149 patients received SOX regimen and 70 patients received S-1 regimen. All patients underwent both preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy consisting of 2-4 cycles each, totaling 6-8 cycles, along with parallel D2 radical surgical treatment. The patients were followed up for a period of three years or until reaching the event endpoint.

          RESULTS

          The short-term and long-term efficacy of the P-SOX group was significantly higher than that of the SOX group, and the safety was manageable. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that progression-free survival was associated with perioperative chemotherapy efficacy, tumor diameter ≤ 2cm, high differentiation, and early cTNM (T stands for invasion depth; N stands for node metastasis; M stands for distant invasion) stage.

          CONCLUSION

          In comparison to the SOX regimen, the P-SOX regimen demonstrates improved short-term and long-term efficacy with tolerable adverse reactions. It is anticipated that the P-SOX regimen will emerge as a first-line chemotherapy option for GC. Patients with GC who receive effective perioperative chemotherapy (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, Tumor Regression Grade), have a tumor diameter ≤ 2cm, exhibit high degree of differentiation, and are at an early cTNM stage show better prognosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial.

          After curative resection, the prognosis of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is poor. This phase III trial was designed to evaluate the benefit in overall survival (OS) of perioperative fluorouracil plus cisplatin in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Overall, 224 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), or stomach were randomly assigned to either perioperative chemotherapy and surgery (CS group; n = 113) or surgery alone (S group; n = 111). Chemotherapy consisted of two or three preoperative cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and a continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5) every 28 days and three or four postoperative cycles of the same regimen. The primary end point was OS. Compared with the S group, the CS group had a better OS (5-year rate 38% v 24%; hazard ratio [HR] for death: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.95; P = .02); and a better disease-free survival (5-year rate: 34% v 19%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, the favorable prognostic factors for survival were perioperative chemotherapy (P = .01) and stomach tumor localization (P < .01). Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improved the curative resection rate (84% v 73%; P = .04). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 38% of CS patients (mainly neutropenia) but postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups. In patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, GEJ, or stomach, perioperative chemotherapy using fluorouracil plus cisplatin significantly increased the curative resection rate, disease-free survival, and OS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.

            ABI-007, the first biologically interactive albumin-bound paclitaxel in a nanameter particle, free of solvents, was compared with polyethylated castor oil-based standard paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase III study was performed to confirm preclinical studies demonstrating superior efficacy and reduced toxicity of ABI-007 compared with standard paclitaxel. Patients were randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of either ABI-007 260 mg/m(2) intravenously without premedication (n = 229) or standard paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously with premedication (n = 225). ABI-007 demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared with standard paclitaxel (33% v 19%, respectively; P = .001) and significantly longer time to tumor progression (23.0 v 16.9 weeks, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.75; P = .006). The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was significantly lower for ABI-007 compared with standard paclitaxel (9% v 22%, respectively; P < .001) despite a 49% higher paclitaxel dose. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon (< 2%), and the incidence did not differ between the two study arms. Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was more common in the ABI-007 arm than in the standard paclitaxel arm (10% v 2%, respectively; P < .001) but was easily managed and improved rapidly (median, 22 days). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred with ABI-007 despite the absence of premedication and shorter administration time. ABI-007 demonstrated greater efficacy and a favorable safety profile compared with standard paclitaxel in this patient population. The improved therapeutic index and elimination of corticosteroid premedication required for solvent-based taxanes make the novel albumin-bound paclitaxel ABI-007 an important advance in the treatment of MBC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.

              The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric Cancer provide evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for a multidisciplinary approach for the management of patients with gastric cancer. For patients with resectable locoregional cancer, the guidelines recommend gastrectomy with a D1+ or a modified D2 lymph node dissection (performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume centers). Postoperative chemoradiation is the preferred option after complete gastric resection for patients with T3-T4 tumors and node-positive T1-T2 tumors. Postoperative chemotherapy is included as an option after a modified D2 lymph node dissection for this group of patients. Trastuzumab with chemotherapy is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic cancer, confirmed by immunohistochemistry and, if needed, by fluorescence in situ hybridization for IHC 2+.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastrointest Surg
                WJGS
                World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1948-9366
                27 October 2024
                27 October 2024
                : 16
                : 10
                : 3224-3238
                Affiliations
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of Interventional Medicine, Xi’an No. 3 Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Northwestern University, Xi’an 710018, Shaanxi Province, China
                Department of RadiologyLuoyang No. 6 People's Hospital, Luoyang 471000, Henan Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China. hnypj768@ 123456126.com
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of RadiologyLuoyang No. 6 People's Hospital, Luoyang 471000, Henan Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
                Author notes

                Co-first authors: Yi-Cong Wang and Long Feng.

                Co-corresponding authors: Gong-Ping Wang and Peng-Jie Yu.

                Author contributions: Wang YC, Feng L, Wang GP designed the study and drafted the manuscript; Wang YC, Feng L, Wang GP, Guo C, Cai BJ, Song Y, Pan T, Lin BH, Li YD, Xiao JJ, and Yu PJ interpreted the data and prepared figures and table; Yu PJ designed and organized the study, interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                Supported by The Department of Science and Technology of Qinghai Province, No. 2018-SF-113; and "Kunlun Talents-Plateau Famous Doctors" Project in Qinghai Province.

                Corresponding author: Peng-Jie Yu, Doctor, DPhil, PhD, Deputy Director, Research Fellow, Surgeon, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, No. 29 Tongren Road, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China. hnypj768@ 123456126.com

                Article
                jWJGS.v16.i10.pg3224 98625
                10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3224
                11577390
                39575280
                a5146b82-a9de-4b95-b26f-cc44d21ebcf8
                ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 1 July 2024
                : 12 August 2024
                : 2 September 2024
                Categories
                Retrospective Study

                nab-paclitaxel,gastric cancer,efficacy,safety
                nab-paclitaxel, gastric cancer, efficacy, safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article