35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over 2.5 million gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) every year. Procedures are carried out with local anaesthetic r with sedation. Sedation is commonly used for gastrointestinal endoscopy, but the type and amount of sedation administered is influenced by the complexity and nature of the procedure and patient factors. The elective and emergency nature of endoscopy procedures and local resources also have a significant impact on the delivery of sedation. In the UK, the vast majority of sedated procedures are carried out using benzodiazepines, with or without opiates, whereas deeper sedation using propofol or general anaesthetic requires the involvement of an anaesthetic team. Patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy need to have good understanding of the options for sedation, including the option for no sedation and alternatives, balancing the intended aims of the procedure and reducing the risk of complications. These guidelines were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Endoscopy Committee with input from major stakeholders, to provide a detailed update, incorporating recent advances in sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

          This guideline covers aspects from pre-assessment of the elective ‘well’ patient to patients with significant comorbidity requiring emergency procedures. Types of sedation are discussed, procedure and room requirements and the recovery period, providing guidance to enhance safety and minimise complications. These guidelines are intended to inform practising clinicians and all staff involved in the delivery of gastrointestinal endoscopy with an expectation that this guideline will be revised in 5-years’ time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references226

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          STOP-Bang Questionnaire: A Practical Approach to Screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

          There exists a high prevalence of OSA in the general population, a great proportion of which remains undiagnosed. The snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high BP, BMI, age, neck circumference, and male gender (STOP-Bang) questionnaire was specifically developed to meet the need for a reliable, concise, and easy-to-use screening tool. It consists of eight dichotomous (yes/no) items related to the clinical features of sleep apnea. The total score ranges from 0 to 8. Patients can be classified for OSA risk based on their respective scores. The sensitivity of STOP-Bang score ≥ 3 to detect moderate to severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 15) and severe OSA (AHI > 30) is 93% and 100%, respectively. Corresponding negative predictive values are 90% and 100%. As the STOP-Bang score increases from 0 to 2 up to 7 to 8, the probability of moderate to severe OSA increases from 18% to 60%, and the probability of severe OSA rises from 4% to 38%. Patients with a STOP-Bang score of 0 to 2 can be classified as low risk for moderate to severe OSA whereas those with a score of 5 to 8 can be classified as high risk for moderate to severe OSA. In patients whose STOP-Bang scores are in the midrange (3 or 4), further criteria are required for classification. For example, a STOP-Bang score of ≥ 2 plus a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) would classify that patient as having a high risk for moderate to severe OSA. In this way, patients can be stratified for OSA risk according to their STOP-Bang scores.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.

            Healthcare practitioners, patient safety leaders, educators and researchers increasingly recognise the value of human factors/ergonomics and make use of the discipline's person-centred models of sociotechnical systems. This paper first reviews one of the most widely used healthcare human factors systems models, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, and then introduces an extended model, 'SEIPS 2.0'. SEIPS 2.0 incorporates three novel concepts into the original model: configuration, engagement and adaptation. The concept of configuration highlights the dynamic, hierarchical and interactive properties of sociotechnical systems, making it possible to depict how health-related performance is shaped at 'a moment in time'. Engagement conveys that various individuals and teams can perform health-related activities separately and collaboratively. Engaged individuals often include patients, family caregivers and other non-professionals. Adaptation is introduced as a feedback mechanism that explains how dynamic systems evolve in planned and unplanned ways. Key implications and future directions for human factors research in healthcare are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.

              Models and methods of work system design need to be developed and implemented to advance research in and design for patient safety. In this paper we describe how the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model of work system and patient safety, which provides a framework for understanding the structures, processes and outcomes in health care and their relationships, can be used toward these ends. An application of the SEIPS model in one particular care setting (outpatient surgery) is presented and other practical and research applications of the model are described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                February 2024
                10 October 2023
                : 73
                : 2
                : 219-245
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentAcademic Department of Gastroenterology , Ringgold_105629Royal Hallamshire Hospital , Sheffield, UK
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease , Ringgold_7315The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Anaesthetics , Ringgold_105629Royal Hallamshire Hospital , Sheffield, UK
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Ringgold_97605University Hospital Llandough , Llandough, South Glamorgan, UK
                [5 ] departmentInstitute of Life Sciences , Ringgold_7759Swansea University , Swansea, UK
                [6 ] departmentHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit , Ringgold_105565Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [7 ] Ringgold_151476Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [8 ] Ringgold_4215Airedale NHS Foundation Trust , Keighley, West Yorkshire, UK
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , University Hospital of North Midlands , Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
                [10 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Ringgold_4595Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Liverpool, UK
                [11 ] Specialist Pharmacist Breastfeeding and Medication , Portsmouth, UK
                [12 ] Digestive Diseases Unit, Kettering General Hospital; Kettering , Kettering, Northamptonshire, UK
                [13 ] departmentDepartment of Population Health Sciences, College of Life Science , University of Leicester , Leicester, UK
                [14 ] Department of Gastroenterology, University College London, UK , London, London, UK
                [15 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , South Tyneside District Hospital , South Shields, Tyne and Wear, UK
                [16 ] Patient Representative on Guideline Development Group and member of Independent Cancer Patients' Voice , Sheffield, UK
                [17 ] Patient Representative on Guideline Development Group , Manchester, UK
                [18 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Sandwell General Hospital , West Bromwich, UK
                [19 ] departmentCentre for Liver and Digestive Disorders , Royal Infirmary Edinburgh , Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Reena Sidhu, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; reenasidhu@ 123456nhs.net
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-2400
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-6225
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-3406
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-8158
                Article
                gutjnl-2023-330396
                10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330396
                10850688
                37816587
                a4e331a4-169b-4f39-b494-0401b370b028
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 31 May 2023
                : 06 September 2023
                Categories
                Guideline
                1506
                2312
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy,endoscopic procedures,colonoscopy,elderly,gastrointesinal endoscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article