25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A phase I/II pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study of irinotecan combined with S−1 for recurrent/metastatic breast cancer in patients with selected UGT1A1 genotypes (the JBCRG‐M01 study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          S‐1 and irinotecan combination is attractive for breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2)‐negative breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were eligible. Patients with brain metastases and homozygous for UGT1A1 *6 or *28 or compound heterozygous (* 6/ *28) were excluded. A dose‐escalation design was chosen for the phase I portion (level 1: irinotecan 80 mg/m 2 days 1–8 and S‐1 80 mg/m 2 days 1–14 every 3 weeks; level 2: irinotecan 100 mg/m 2 and S‐1 80 mg/m 2). Study objectives included determination of the recommended dose for phase II, response rate, progression‐free survival ( PFS), and safety. Pharmacokinetics and CD34 + circulating endothelial cells ( CECs) as pharmacodynamics were also analyzed. Thirty‐seven patients were included. One patient at each level developed dose‐limiting toxicities; therefore, level 2 was the recommended dose for phase II. Diarrhea was more common in patients possessing a *6 or *28 allele compared with wild‐type homozygous patients (46% and 25%). Among 29 patients treated at level 2, PFS was longer for UGT1A1 wt/*6 and wt/*28 patients than for wt/ wt patients (12 vs. 8 months, P = 0.06). PFS was significantly longer in patients with a larger‐than‐median SN‐38 area under the curve ( AUC) than in those with a smaller AUC ( P = 0.039). There was an association between clinical benefit and reduction in baseline CD34 + CECs by S‐1 ( P = 0.047). The combination of irinotecan and S‐1 is effective and warrants further investigation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results.

          Docetaxel and capecitabine, a tumor-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, show high single-agent efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and synergy in preclinical studies. This international phase III trial compared efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine/docetaxel therapy with single-agent docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC. Patients were randomized to 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 255) or to docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 256). Capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in significantly superior efficacy in time to disease progression (TTP) (hazard ratio, 0.652; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.545 to 0.780; P =.0001; median, 6.1 v 4.2 months), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.634 to 0.947; P =.0126; median, 14.5 v 11.5 months), and objective tumor response rate (42% v 30%, P =.006) compared with docetaxel. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-foot syndrome were more common with combination therapy, whereas myalgia, arthralgia, and neutropenic fever/sepsis were more common with single-agent docetaxel. More grade 3 adverse events occurred with combination therapy (71% v 49%, respectively), whereas grade 4 events were slightly more common with docetaxel (31% v 25% with combination). The significantly superior TTP and survival achieved with the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), with the manageable toxicity profile, indicate that this combination provides clear benefits over single-agent docetaxel 100 mg/m(2). Docetaxel/capecitabine therapy is an important treatment option for women with anthracycline-pretreated MBC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan.

            Severe toxicity is commonly observed in cancer patients receiving irinotecan. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) catalyzes the glucuronidation of the active metabolite SN-38. This study prospectively evaluated the association between the prevalence of severe toxicity and UGT1A1 genetic variation. Sixty-six cancer patients with advanced disease refractory to other treatments received irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Toxicity and pharmacokinetic data were measured during cycle 1. UGT1A1 variants (-3279G>T, -3156G>A, promoter TA indel, 211G>A, 686C>A) were genotyped. The prevalence of grade 4 neutropenia was 9.5%. Grade 4 neutropenia was much more common in patients with the TA indel 7/7 genotype (3 of 6 patients; 50%) compared with 6/7 (3 of 24 patients; 12.5%) and 6/6 (0 of 29 patients; 0%) (P =.001). The TA indel genotype was significantly associated with the absolute neutrophil count nadir (7/7 A variant seemed to distinguish different phenotypes of total bilirubin within the TA indel genotypes. The -3156 genotype and the SN-38 area under the concentration versus time curve were significant predictors of ln(absolute neutrophil count nadir; r(2) = 0.51). UGT1A1 genotype and total bilirubin levels are strongly associated with severe neutropenia, and could be used to identify cancer patients predisposed to the severe toxicity of irinotecan. The hypothesis that the -3156G>A variant is a better predictor of UGT1A1 status than the previously reported TA indel requires further testing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Markers of response for the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab.

              Bevacizumab is the first antiangiogenic therapy proven to slow metastatic disease progression in patients with cancer. Although it has changed clinical practice, some patients do not respond or gradually develop resistance, resulting in rather modest gains in terms of overall survival. A major challenge is to develop robust biomarkers that can guide selection of patients for whom bevacizumab therapy is most beneficial. Here, we discuss recent progress in finding such markers, including the first results from randomized phase III clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with comprehensive biomarker analyses. In particular, these studies suggest that circulating levels of short vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) isoforms, expression of neuropilin-1 and VEGF receptor 1 in tumors or plasma, and genetic variants in VEGFA or its receptors are strong biomarker candidates. The current challenge is to expand this first set of markers and to validate it and implement it into clinical practice. A first prospective biomarker study known as MERiDiAN, which will treat patients stratified for circulating levels of short VEGF-A isoforms with bevacizumab and paclitaxel, is planned and will hopefully provide us with new directions on how to treat patients more efficiently.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hishiguro@iuhw.ac.jp
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                13 November 2017
                December 2017
                : 6
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.2017.6.issue-12 )
                : 2909-2917
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medical Oncology International University of Health and Welfare Hospital Nasushiobara Japan
                [ 2 ] Department of Medical Oncology Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan
                [ 3 ] Center for Research and Administration and Support National Cancer Center Kashiwa Japan
                [ 4 ] Department of Breast Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
                [ 5 ] Department of Breast Surgery Kyorin University Hospital Mitaka Japan
                [ 6 ] Department of Pharmacy Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan
                [ 7 ] Department of Breast Oncology Aichi Cancer Center Nagoya Japan
                [ 8 ] Department of Biostatistics Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan
                [ 9 ] Department of Medical Oncology Showa University Tokyo Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Hiroshi Ishiguro, Department of Medical Oncology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, 537‐3 Iguchi, Nasushiobara, Tochigi, 329‐2763, Japan. Tel: +81‐287‐39‐3060; Fax: +81‐287‐39‐3001; E‐mail: hishiguro@ 123456iuhw.ac.jp

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-5932
                Article
                CAM41258
                10.1002/cam4.1258
                5727322
                29131533
                a41d40db-21ca-4dae-a76d-09c329cdc21d
                © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 May 2017
                : 16 August 2017
                : 19 September 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 9, Words: 4747
                Funding
                Funded by: Grant‐in‐aid for Scientific Research
                Award ID: JP24590656
                Funded by: Advanced Clinical Research Organization
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cam41258
                December 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.8 mode:remove_FC converted:13.12.2017

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                breast cancer,circulating endothelial cells,irinotecan,s‐1,sn‐38,ugt1a1
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                breast cancer, circulating endothelial cells, irinotecan, s‐1, sn‐38, ugt1a1

                Comments

                Comment on this article