Additive Intralesional Interleukin-2 Improves Progression-Free Survival in a Distinct Subgroup of Melanoma Patients with Prior Progression under Immunotherapy

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

A considerable amount of melanoma patients show primary resistance to PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. We have previously reported a beneficial role of intralesional Interleukin-2 (IL-2) in 9 melanoma patients developing new locoregional metastases under immunotherapy. We have now expanded this retrospective cohort to 27 patients. Patients were evaluated for their tumor characteristics, treatment response and progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS). In 16 patients, tumor biopsies before and under IL-2 treatment were evaluated for immune markers. The median follow-up time was 16 (1–59) months from start of IL-2 treatment. Treatment response of locoregional metastases was seen in 74% of all patients and response of distant organ metastases in 37% of stage IV patients, respectively. A prolonged PFS and OS was significantly associated with absence of active distant metastases (p = 0.008), response of locoregional metastases (p = 0.002), increase of absolute eosinophil count (AEC) (p < 0.001) and an influx of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (p = 0.003). Additional intralesional treatment with IL-2 in patients with locoregional progression under immunotherapy is a well-tolerated, easily feasible therapeutic option especially in patients lacking active distant metastases. A careful patient selection can lead to an improved PFS and OS.

Related collections

Most cited references 27

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

E A Eisenhauer, P Therasse, J. Bogaerts … (2009)

Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.

0 comments Cited 5548 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis

Peter Bankhead, Maurice B Loughrey, Jose A Gegundez Fernandez … (2017)

QuPath is new bioimage analysis software designed to meet the growing need for a user-friendly, extensible, open-source solution for digital pathology and whole slide image analysis. In addition to offering a comprehensive panel of tumor identification and high-throughput biomarker evaluation tools, QuPath provides researchers with powerful batch-processing and scripting functionality, and an extensible platform with which to develop and share new algorithms to analyze complex tissue images. Furthermore, QuPath’s flexible design makes it suitable for a wide range of additional image analysis applications across biomedical research.

0 comments Cited 2027 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Robert Andtbacka, Howard L. Kaufman, Frances A Collichio … (2015)

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a herpes simplex virus type 1-derived oncolytic immunotherapy designed to selectively replicate within tumors and produce granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to enhance systemic antitumor immune responses. T-VEC was compared with GM-CSF in patients with unresected stage IIIB to IV melanoma in a randomized open-label phase III trial.