2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationship between daytime napping with the occurrence and development of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To determine the relationship of napping with incident diabetes risk and glycaemic control in people with diabetes.

          Design

          Systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Data sources

          MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from database inception to 9 May 2023.

          Eligibility criteria

          Observational studies reporting the relationship of napping with diabetes or glycaemic control in patients with diabetes in adult populations were included.

          Data extraction and synthesis

          Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. The results were reported as ORs and 95% CIs, which were pooled by using fixed and random effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method was used to assess the quality of the evidence.

          Results

          Forty studies were included in our review. Habitual napping was associated with an increased diabetes risk (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.27) and poor glycaemic control in patients with diabetes (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.73). Nap durations less than 30 min were unrelated to diabetes (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14). Nap durations of 30–60 min were associated with diabetes risk (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17), but there were differences in the subgroup analysis results. Nap durations of more than 60 min significantly increased the risk of diabetes (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.44).

          Conclusions

          Napping is associated with increased diabetes risk and poor glycaemic control, and future research will need to confirm whether there are sex and regional differences. Nap durations of more than 60 min significantly increases the risk of diabetes, and the relationship between nap duration and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes needs to be further explored in the future.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CRD42021292103.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2023
                22 September 2023
                : 13
                : 9
                : e068554
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Nursing , Ringgold_38044Xuzhou Medical University , Xuzhou, China
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Nursing , Ringgold_506616Central South University Xiangya , Changsha, Hunan, China
                [3 ]departmentSchool of Nursing , Ringgold_12465Peking University , Beijing, China
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Hongyu Sun; sunhongyu@ 123456bjmu.edu.cn
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-8315
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4554-3135
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-068554
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068554
                10533785
                37739471
                a3723f57-8893-46b1-be5e-5665cd72b107
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 September 2022
                : 30 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Open Fund of Xuzhou Medical University;
                Award ID: KY14042111
                Funded by: Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province;
                Award ID: KYCX21_2652
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 72174012
                Categories
                Diabetes and Endocrinology
                1506
                1843
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                diabetes mellitus,glycaemic control,hyperglycaemia,sleep
                Medicine
                diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, hyperglycaemia, sleep

                Comments

                Comment on this article