6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Spontaneous face- and eye-touching: Infection risk versus potential microbiome gain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has compelled a review of possible routes of microbial infection, of particular importance since the ocular surface is a likely portal of human Coronavirus invasion. As hand contamination is considered an important and potentially preventable factor for transmission, we have reviewed face touching in the context of a group of disorders known as the Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviours (BFRPs). Spontaneous face-touching is a poorly understood, atavistic, ingrained habit for humans, who engage in this activity approximately 26 times per hour. Nearly half of spontaneous face-touches involve mucous membranes, and one third of those involve the eyes. Historically the majority of research of this curious phenomenon has focused on psychological aspects, despite its pertinence to a range of anterior eye diseases such as keratoconus, trichotillomania and mucus-fishing syndrome. The ocular infectious sequelae through chiral auto-inoculation are well known for diseases including the conjunctivitides, herpetic keratitis, and papillomatosis. Furthermore, touches to the ocular mucous membranes also play an important role in systemic disease through access to the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts via the nasolacrimal duct and nasopharynx, and may be relevant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Through this access, chiral touches may also play a significant role in building and maintaining the microbiome, which has been increasingly implicated in ocular disease. This article reviews spontaneous self-touches, and their significant ramifications for ocular and systemic health and disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Handwashing and risk of respiratory infections: a quantitative systematic review

          Summary Objective  To determine the effect of handwashing on the risk of respiratory infection. Methods  We searched PubMed, CAB Abstracts, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for articles published before June 2004 in all languages. We had searched reference lists of all primary and review articles. Studies were included in the review if they reported the impact of an intervention to promote hand cleansing on respiratory infections. Studies relating to hospital‐acquired infections, long‐term care facilities, immuno‐compromised and elderly people were excluded. We independently evaluated all studies, and inclusion decisions were reached by consensus. From a primary list of 410 articles, eight interventional studies met the eligibility criteria. Results  All eight eligible studies reported that handwashing lowered risks of respiratory infection, with risk reductions ranging from 6% to 44% [pooled value 24% (95% CI 6–40%)]. Pooling the results of only the seven homogenous studies gave a relative risk of 1.19 (95% CI 1.12%–1.26%), implying that hand cleansing can cut the risk of respiratory infection by 16% (95% CI 11–21%). Conclusions  Handwashing is associated with lowered respiratory infection. However, studies were of poor quality, none related to developing countries, and only one to severe disease. Rigorous trials of the impact of handwashing on acute respiratory tract infection morbidity and mortality are urgently needed, especially in developing countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Face touching: A frequent habit that has implications for hand hygiene

            Background There is limited literature on the frequency of face-touching behavior as a potential vector for the self-inoculation and transmission of Staphylococcus aureus and other common respiratory infections. Methods A behavioral observation study was undertaken involving medical students at the University of New South Wales. Their face-touching behavior was observed via videotape recording. Using standardized scoring sheets, the frequency of hand-to-face contacts with mucosal or nonmucosal areas was tallied and analyzed. Results On average, each of the 26 observed students touched their face 23 times per hour. Of all face touches, 44% (1,024/2,346) involved contact with a mucous membrane, whereas 56% (1,322/2,346) of contacts involved nonmucosal areas. Of mucous membrane touches observed, 36% (372) involved the mouth, 31% (318) involved the nose, 27% (273) involved the eyes, and 6% (61) were a combination of these regions. Conclusion Increasing medical students' awareness of their habituated face-touching behavior and improving their understanding of self-inoculation as a route of transmission may help to improve hand hygiene compliance. Hand hygiene programs aiming to improve compliance with before and after patient contact should include a message that mouth and nose touching is a common practice. Hand hygiene is therefore an essential and inexpensive preventive method to break the colonization and transmission cycle associated with self-inoculation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Review of human hand microbiome research.

              Recent advances have increased our understanding of the human microbiome, including the skin microbiome. Despite the importance of the hands as a vector for infection transmission, there have been no comprehensive reviews of recent advances in hand microbiome research or overviews of the factors that influence the composition of the hand microbiome. A comprehensive and systematic database search was conducted for skin microbiome-related articles published from January 1, 2008 to April 1, 2015. Only primary research articles that used culture-independent, whole community analysis methods to study the healthy hand skin microbiome were included. Eighteen articles were identified containing hand microbiome data. Most focused on bacteria, with relatively little reported on fungi, viruses, and protozoa. Bacteria from four phyla were found across all studies of the hand microbiome (most to least relative abundance): Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes. Key factors that impacted the hand microbiome composition included temporal and biogeographical dynamics, as well as intrinsic (age, gender) and extrinsic (product use, cohabitants, pet-ownership) variables. There was more temporal variability in the composition of the hand microbiome than in other body sites, making identification of the "normal" microbiome of the hands challenging. The microbiome of the hands is in constant flux as the hands are a critical vector for transmitting microorganisms between people, pets, inanimate objects and our environments. Future studies need to resolve methodological influences on results, and further investigate factors which alter the hand microbiome including the impact of products applied to hands. Increased understanding of the hand microbiome and the skin microbiome in general, will open the door to product development for disease prevention and treatment, and may lead to other applications, including novel diagnostic and forensic approaches.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ocul Surf
                Ocul Surf
                The Ocular Surface
                Published by Elsevier Inc.
                1542-0124
                1937-5913
                30 April 2021
                30 April 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
                [b ]University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Department of Ophthalmology Prince of Wales Hospital High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
                Article
                S1542-0124(21)00036-7
                10.1016/j.jtos.2021.04.008
                8086376
                33940169
                a33e5f7c-0e18-4e5a-ab04-c64ecb008b95
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 17 November 2020
                : 19 April 2021
                : 19 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                ophthalmology,infectious disease,behavioural medicine,microbiology,microbiome,self-harm,ocular pathology,ocular surface disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article