33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 5 , 2 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 2 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 ,
      BMC Medical Education
      BioMed Central
      Postgraduate medical education, Physicians, Medical ethics, Ethics training program, Ethics education, Ethics curriculum, Scoping review, Systematic scoping review, SEBA

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the transition from medical students to healthcare professionals entails a longitudinal process where ethics knowledge, skills and identity continue to build and deepen over time with clinical exposure.

          A systematic scoping review is proposed to analyse current postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment programs in peer-reviewed literature to guide the development of a local physician training curriculum.

          Methods

          With a constructivist perspective and relativist lens, this systematic scoping review on postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment will adopt the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to create a transparent and reproducible review.

          Results

          The first search involving the teaching of ethics yielded 7669 abstracts with 573 full text articles evaluated and 66 articles included. The second search involving the assessment of ethics identified 9919 abstracts with 333 full text articles reviewed and 29 articles included. The themes identified from the two searches were the goals and objectives, content, pedagogy, enabling and limiting factors of teaching ethics and assessment modalities used. Despite inherent disparities in ethics training programs, they provide a platform for learners to apply knowledge, translating it to skill and eventually becoming part of the identity of the learner. Illustrating the longitudinal nature of ethics training, the spiral curriculum seamlessly integrates and fortifies prevailing ethical knowledge acquired in medical school with the layering of new specialty, clinical and research specific content in professional practice. Various assessment methods are employed with special mention of portfolios as a longitudinal assessment modality that showcase the impact of ethics training on the development of professional identity formation (PIF).

          Conclusions

          Our systematic scoping review has elicited key learning points in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. However, more research needs to be done on establishing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)s in ethics, with further exploration of the use of portfolios and key factors influencing its design, implementation and assessment of PIF and micro-credentialling in ethics practice.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references144

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

            Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hongzhihao@live.com
                jialinggoh@rocketmail.com
                ongzhiyang@gmail.com
                jacting@gmail.com
                Mkcasperghost@hotmail.com
                jx1998@gmail.com
                tnxiuhui@gmail.com
                rtqen1@gmail.com
                chiangcll@gmail.com
                Whngcaleb@gmail.com
                jarednckuni@gmail.com
                yunting.ong08@gmail.com
                clarissacheongws@gmail.com
                taykuangteck@hotmail.com
                laura.tan.hs@gmail.com
                gillian.phua.l.g@singhealth.com.sg
                warren.fong.w.s@singhealth.com.sg
                limin.wijaya@singhealth.com.sg
                shirlyn.neo.h.s@singhealth.com.sg
                lee.sze.inn@nccs.com.sg
                chiam.min@nccs.com.sg
                annelissa_chin@nus.edu.sg
                lalit.radha-krishna@liverpool.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                9 June 2021
                9 June 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 338
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, , National University of Singapore, ; NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
                [2 ]GRID grid.410724.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0620 9745, Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, ; 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
                [3 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Duke-NUS Medical School, , National University of Singapore, ; 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
                [4 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, ; 16 College Road, Block 6 Level 9, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169854 Singapore
                [5 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, ; Outram Road, Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                [6 ]GRID grid.410724.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0620 9745, Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, ; 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
                [7 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Medical Library, , National University of Singapore Libraries, ; Blk MD6, Centre, 14 Medical Dr, #05-01 for Translational Medicine, Singapore, 117599 Singapore
                [8 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, , University of Liverpool, ; 200 London Rd, L3 9TA Liverpool, UK
                [9 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Centre of Biomedical Ethics, , National University of Singapore, ; 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077 Singapore
                [10 ]PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436 Singapore
                Article
                2644
                10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5
                8188952
                34107935
                a2fe46ad-d2f6-46e9-86ac-805e61be4ce9
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 21 November 2020
                : 30 March 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Education
                postgraduate medical education,physicians,medical ethics,ethics training program,ethics education,ethics curriculum,scoping review,systematic scoping review,seba

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content252

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors1,728