21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and International Chapter of Clinical Endocrinology (ICCE). Position statement for clinical practice: prolactin-secreting tumors

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary adenomas. Prolactinoma may occur in different clinical settings and always require an individually tailored approach. This is the reason why a panel of Italian neuroendocrine experts was charged with the task to provide indications for the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that can be easily applied in different contexts. The document provides 15 recommendations for diagnosis and 54 recommendations for treatment, issued according to the GRADE system. The level of agreement among panel members was formally evaluated by RAND-UCLA methodology. In the last century, prolactinomas represented the paradigm of pituitary tumors for which the development of highly effective drugs obtained the best results, allowing to avoid neurosurgery in most cases. The impressive improvement of neurosurgical endoscopic techniques allows a far better definition of the tumoral tissue during surgery and the remission of endocrine symptoms in many patients with pituitary tumors. Consequently, this refinement of neurosurgery is changing the therapeutic strategy in prolactinomas, allowing the definitive cure of some patients with permanent discontinuation of medical therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references243

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations. Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication. We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts. In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of the baseline risk. It is also important to consider costs (resource utilisation) before making a recommendation. Inconsistencies among systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations reduce their potential to facilitate critical appraisal and improve communication of these judgments. Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Testosterone Therapy in Men With Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

              To update the "Testosterone Therapy in Men With Androgen Deficiency Syndromes" guideline published in 2010.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Endocrinol
                Eur J Endocrinol
                EJE
                European Journal of Endocrinology
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                0804-4643
                1479-683X
                06 January 2022
                01 March 2022
                : 186
                : 3
                : P1-P33
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Endocrinology , Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine , Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                [3 ]AME Scientific Committee , Milan, Italy
                [4 ]Endocrinology Unit , IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
                [5 ]Neuroradiology , S. Andrea Hospital, NESMOS Department (Neuroscience, Mental Health, Sensorial Organs), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Laboratorio Analisi Cliniche e Microbiologia , Synlab SRL, Calenzano, Florence, Italy
                [7 ]Endocrinology , Ospedale Martini, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
                [8 ]Pituitary Unit , Department of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
                [9 ]Internal Medicine 2 , Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy
                [10 ]IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                [11 ]AME President , Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
                [12 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences , Endocrinology Unit, Rozzano, Italy
                [13 ]Department of Neurosurgery , Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
                [14 ]Endocrinology Unit , Bisceglie Hospital, ASLBT, Bisceglie, Italy
                [15 ]Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery , IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
                [16 ]Department of Medicine (DIMED) , 3rd Medical Clinic, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
                [17 ]Endocrinology , Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [18 ]Endocrinology Unit , Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [19 ]Department of Medicine , Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA
                [20 ]Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism , Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [21 ]‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Endocrinology , “C.I. Parhon” National Institute of Endocrinology – Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Disorders, Bucharest, Romania
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to R Cozzi; Email: dr.renatocozzi@ 123456gmail.com

                This document reflects the state of the art at the time of publication and it aims to standardize clinical practice. We encourage medical professionals to always use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment as the presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-287X
                Article
                EJE-21-0977
                10.1530/EJE-21-0977
                8859924
                35000899
                a29db31e-0d13-4bf6-a04e-3eba771a0113
                © The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 21 September 2021
                : 06 January 2022
                Categories
                Consensus Statement

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article