1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do dogs preferentially encode the identity of the target object or the location of others’ actions?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ability to make sense of and predict others’ actions is foundational for many socio-cognitive abilities. Dogs ( Canis familiaris) constitute interesting comparative models for the study of action perception due to their marked sensitivity to human actions. We tested companion dogs ( N = 21) in two screen-based eye-tracking experiments, adopting a task previously used with human infants and apes, to assess which aspects of an agent’s action dogs consider relevant to the agent’s underlying intentions. An agent was shown repeatedly acting upon the same one of two objects, positioned in the same location. We then presented the objects in swapped locations and the agent approached the objects centrally (Experiment 1) or the old object in the new location or the new object in the old location (Experiment 2). Dogs’ anticipatory fixations and looking times did not reflect an expectation that agents should have continued approaching the same object nor the same location as witnessed during the brief familiarization phase; this contrasts with some findings with infants and apes, but aligns with findings in younger infants before they have sufficient motor experience with the observed action. However, dogs’ pupil dilation and latency to make an anticipatory fixation suggested that, if anything, dogs expected the agents to keep approaching the same location rather than the same object, and their looking times showed sensitivity to the animacy of the agents. We conclude that dogs, lacking motor experience with the observed actions of grasping or kicking performed by a human or inanimate agent, might interpret such actions as directed toward a specific location rather than a specific object. Future research will need to further probe the suitability of anticipatory looking as measure of dogs’ socio-cognitive abilities given differences between the visual systems of dogs and primates.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-024-01870-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling

            Count data can be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models when observations are correlated in ways that require random effects. However, count data are often zero-inflated, containing more zeros than would be expected from the typical error distributions. We present a new package, glmmTMB, and compare it to other R packages that fit zero-inflated mixed models. The glmmTMB package fits many types of GLMMs and extensions, including models with continuously distributed responses, but here we focus on count responses. glmmTMB is faster than glmmADMB, MCMCglmm, and brms, and more flexible than INLA and mgcv for zero-inflated modeling. One unique feature of glmmTMB (among packages that fit zero-inflated mixed models) is its ability to estimate the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution parameterized by the mean. Overall, its most appealing features for new users may be the combination of speed, flexibility, and its interface’s similarity to lme4. The R journal, 9 (2) ISSN:2073-4859
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lucrezia.lonardo@vetmeduni.ac.at
                Journal
                Anim Cogn
                Anim Cogn
                Animal Cognition
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1435-9448
                1435-9456
                30 March 2024
                30 March 2024
                2024
                : 27
                : 1
                : 28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.6583.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9686 6466, Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, , University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, ; Veterinärplatz 1, Vienna, 1210 Austria
                [2 ]Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, ( https://ror.org/02a33b393) Leipzig, 04103 Germany
                [3 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, ( https://ror.org/052gg0110) Oxford, OX2 6GG UK
                [4 ]Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Cognition, Emotion and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, ( https://ror.org/03prydq77) Vienna, 1010 Austria
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-3766
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8368-7201
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-6549
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-0653
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-136X
                Article
                1870
                10.1007/s10071-024-01870-w
                10980658
                38553650
                a24aa497-014f-44be-ad62-ae3bb1722316
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 December 2023
                : 22 March 2024
                : 24 March 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Animal science & Zoology
                social cognition,dog cognition,action perception,goal-directed actions,eye-tracking

                Comments

                Comment on this article