41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Cancer Biology and Therapy

      Submit here by August 31, 2025

      About Cytogenetic and Genome Research: 1.7 Impact Factor I 3.1 CiteScore I 0.385 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2019

      review-article
      a , * , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , m , n , o , p , a , e , q , h , r , s , t , u , v , w , x , y , z , A , y , B , C , D , E , F , G , H , I , J , K , L , M , d , N
      Breast Care
      S. Karger AG
      Early breast cancer, Systemic therapy, Local therapy, Treatment recommendations

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

          Pathological complete response has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint for prediction of long-term clinical benefit, such as disease-free survival, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). We had four key objectives: to establish the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS, to establish the definition of pathological complete response that correlates best with long-term outcome, to identify the breast cancer subtypes in which pathological complete response is best correlated with long-term outcome, and to assess whether an increase in frequency of pathological complete response between treatment groups predicts improved EFS and OS. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline for clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. To be eligible, studies had to meet three inclusion criteria: include at least 200 patients with primary breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery; have available data for pathological complete response, EFS, and OS; and have a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We compared the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response--ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is--for their association with EFS and OS in a responder analysis. We assessed the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS in various subgroups. Finally, we did a trial-level analysis to assess whether pathological complete response could be used as a surrogate endpoint for EFS or OS. We obtained data from 12 identified international trials and 11 955 patients were included in our responder analysis. Eradication of tumour from both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0) was better associated with improved EFS (ypT0 ypN0: hazard ratio [HR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·51; ypT0/is ypN0: 0·48, 0·43-0·54) and OS (0·36, 0·30-0·44; 0·36, 0·31-0·42) than was tumour eradication from the breast alone (ypT0/is; EFS: HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·55-0·66; OS 0·51, 0·45-0·58). We used the ypT0/is ypN0 definition for all subsequent analyses. The association between pathological complete response and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (EFS: HR 0·24, 95% CI 0·18-0·33; OS: 0·16, 0·11-0·25) and in those with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative tumours who received trastuzumab (EFS: 0·15, 0·09-0·27; OS: 0·08, 0·03, 0·22). In the trial-level analysis, we recorded little association between increases in frequency of pathological complete response and EFS (R(2)=0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25) and OS (R(2)=0·24, 0·00-0·70). Patients who attain pathological complete response defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0 have improved survival. The prognostic value is greatest in aggressive tumour subtypes. Our pooled analysis could not validate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for improved EFS and OS. US Food and Drug Administration. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy

            Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

              Breast cancer is a leading cause of premature mortality among US women. Early detection has been shown to be associated with reduced breast cancer morbidity and mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BRC
                BRC
                10.1159/issn.1661-3791
                Breast Care
                S. Karger AG
                1661-3791
                1661-3805
                2019
                August 2019
                06 August 2019
                : 14
                : 4
                : 224-245
                Affiliations
                [_a] aBrustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
                [_A] AKlinik für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [_b] bKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
                [_B] BSenologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
                [_c] cKlinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [_C] CZentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
                [_d] dKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                [_D] DKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
                [_e] eKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
                [_E] EKlinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
                [_f] fKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
                [_F] FGynäkologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [_g] gFrauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
                [_G] GKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [_h] hKlinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
                [_H] HSektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany
                [_i] iStrahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [_I] IKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [_j] jFrauenklinik Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
                [_J] JKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
                [_k] kPraxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
                [_K] KKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
                [_l] lFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
                [_L] LUniversitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany
                [_m] mKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [_M] MUniversitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [_n] nKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
                [_N] NKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                [_o] oUniversitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
                [_p] pFrauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
                [_q] qKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
                [_r] rInstitut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
                [_s] sKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
                [_t] tKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
                [_u] uKlinik für Senologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
                [_v] vGerman Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
                [_w] wMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
                [_x] xKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St. Vinzenz-Krankenhaus GmbH Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
                [_y] yKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
                [_z] zKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                Author notes
                *Prof. Dr. Nina Ditsch, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, DE–81377 Munich (Germany), E-Mail marc.thill@fdk.info
                Article
                501000 PMC6751475 Breast Care 2019;14:224–245
                10.1159/000501000
                PMC6751475
                31558897
                a2274818-6157-40dc-9001-710c275bfbde
                © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 26 April 2019
                : 16 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 23
                Categories
                Clinical Information

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Early breast cancer,Local therapy,Treatment recommendations,Systemic therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                81
                1
                98
                0
                Smart Citations
                81
                1
                98
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,204

                Cited by35

                Most referenced authors3,462