76
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Crowdsourcing reproducible seizure forecasting in human and canine epilepsy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          See Mormann and Andrzejak (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/brain/aww091) for a scientific commentary on this article.  

          Seizures are thought to arise from an identifiable pre-ictal state. Brinkmann et al. report the results of an online, open-access seizure forecasting competition using intracranial EEG recordings from canines with naturally occurring epilepsy and human patients undergoing presurgical monitoring. The winning algorithms forecast seizures at rates significantly greater than chance.

          Abstract

          See Mormann and Andrzejak (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/brain/aww091) for a scientific commentary on this article.  

          Seizures are thought to arise from an identifiable pre-ictal state. Brinkmann et al. report the results of an online, open-access seizure forecasting competition using intracranial EEG recordings from canines with naturally occurring epilepsy and human patients undergoing presurgical monitoring. The winning algorithms forecast seizures at rates significantly greater than chance.

          Abstract

          See Mormann and Andrzejak (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/brain/aww091) for a scientific commentary on this article.  

          Accurate forecasting of epileptic seizures has the potential to transform clinical epilepsy care. However, progress toward reliable seizure forecasting has been hampered by lack of open access to long duration recordings with an adequate number of seizures for investigators to rigorously compare algorithms and results. A seizure forecasting competition was conducted on kaggle.com using open access chronic ambulatory intracranial electroencephalography from five canines with naturally occurring epilepsy and two humans undergoing prolonged wide bandwidth intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring. Data were provided to participants as 10-min interictal and preictal clips, with approximately half of the 60 GB data bundle labelled (interictal/preictal) for algorithm training and half unlabelled for evaluation. The contestants developed custom algorithms and uploaded their classifications (interictal/preictal) for the unknown testing data, and a randomly selected 40% of data segments were scored and results broadcasted on a public leader board. The contest ran from August to November 2014, and 654 participants submitted 17 856 classifications of the unlabelled test data. The top performing entry scored 0.84 area under the classification curve. Following the contest, additional held-out unlabelled data clips were provided to the top 10 participants and they submitted classifications for the new unseen data. The resulting area under the classification curves were well above chance forecasting, but did show a mean 6.54 ± 2.45% (min, max: 0.30, 20.2) decline in performance. The kaggle.com model using open access data and algorithms generated reproducible research that advanced seizure forecasting. The overall performance from multiple contestants on unseen data was better than a random predictor, and demonstrates the feasibility of seizure forecasting in canine and human epilepsy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.

          The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory

            T Higuchi (1988)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study.

              Seizure prediction would be clinically useful in patients with epilepsy and could improve safety, increase independence, and allow acute treatment. We did a multicentre clinical feasibility study to assess the safety and efficacy of a long-term implanted seizure advisory system designed to predict seizure likelihood and quantify seizures in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures. We enrolled patients at three centres in Melbourne, Australia, between March 24, 2010, and June 21, 2011. Eligible patients had between two and 12 disabling partial-onset seizures per month, a lateralised epileptogenic zone, and no history of psychogenic seizures. After devices were surgically implanted, patients entered a data collection phase, during which an algorithm for identification of periods of high, moderate, and low seizure likelihood was established. If the algorithm met performance criteria (ie, sensitivity of high-likelihood warnings greater than 65% and performance better than expected through chance prediction of randomly occurring events), patients then entered an advisory phase and received information about seizure likelihood. The primary endpoint was the number of device-related adverse events at 4 months after implantation. Our secondary endpoints were algorithm performance at the end of the data collection phase, clinical effectiveness (measures of anxiety, depression, seizure severity, and quality of life) 4 months after initiation of the advisory phase, and longer-term adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01043406. We implanted 15 patients with the advisory system. 11 device-related adverse events were noted within four months of implantation, two of which were serious (device migration, seroma); an additional two serious adverse events occurred during the first year after implantation (device-related infection, device site reaction), but were resolved without further complication. The device met enabling criteria in 11 patients upon completion of the data collection phase, with high likelihood performance estimate sensitivities ranging from 65% to 100%. Three patients' algorithms did not meet performance criteria and one patient required device removal because of an adverse event before sufficient training data were acquired. We detected no significant changes in clinical effectiveness measures between baseline and 4 months after implantation. This study showed that intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring is feasible in ambulatory patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. If these findings are replicated in larger, longer studies, accurate definition of preictal electrical activity might improve understanding of seizure generation and eventually lead to new management strategies. NeuroVista. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                brain
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                June 2016
                31 March 2016
                31 March 2016
                : 139
                : 6
                : 1713-1722
                Affiliations
                1Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
                2University of Pennsylvania, Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                3AiLive Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
                4University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, Queensland, Australia
                5Hemedics Inc, Boston, MA, USA
                6CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Valencia, Spain
                7Sydney, Australia
                8New York, NY, USA
                9Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                10Kaggle, Inc. New York NY, USA
                11University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine Philadelphia, PA, USA
                12University of Minnesota, Veterinary Medical Center, St. Paul, MN, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Benjamin H. Brinkmann, PhD, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA E-mail: Brinkmann.Benjamin@ 123456mayo.edu

                See Mormann and Andrzejak (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/brain/aww091) for a scientific commentary on this article.

                Article
                aww045
                10.1093/brain/aww045
                5006301
                27034258
                a2224ad9-d0d0-4ab9-b532-d8974af3a5ee
                © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 29 September 2015
                : 09 December 2015
                : 28 January 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Articles
                1020

                Neurosciences
                epilepsy,intracranial eeg,refractory epilepsy,experimental models
                Neurosciences
                epilepsy, intracranial eeg, refractory epilepsy, experimental models

                Comments

                Comment on this article