16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Visual impact beam plots: Analyzing research profiles and bibliometric metrics using the following-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background:

          A new approach to showcasing author publications on a website involves using a visual representation instead of the conventional paper list. The creation of an impact beam plot (IBP) as a research profile for individuals is crucial, especially when incorporating collection edges that include self-cited articles through a rare cluster analysis technique not commonly found in the literature. This study presents the application of a unique method called the following-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA) to generate IBPs for 3 highly productive authors.

          Methods:

          For the 3 highly productive authors, Sung-Ho Jang from South Korea, Chia-Hung Kao from Taiwan, and Chin-Hsiao Tseng from Taiwan, all their published articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection were downloaded. Sung-Ho Jang published 593 articles, Chia-Hung Kao published 732 articles, and Chin-Hsiao Tseng published 160 articles. To analyze and showcase their publications, the FLCA was utilized. This algorithm helped cluster their articles and identify representative publications for each author. To assess the effectiveness and validity of the FLCA algorithm, both network charts and heatmaps with dendrograms were employed. IBPs were then created and compared for each of the 3 authors, taking into consideration their h-index, x-index, and self-citation rate. This allowed for a comprehensive visual representation of their research impact and citation patterns.

          Results:

          The results show that these authors’ h-index, x-index, and self-citation rates were (37, 44.01, 1.66%), (42, 61.47, 0.23%), and (37, 40.3, 6.62%), respectively. A higher value in these metrics indicates a more remarkable research achievement. A higher self-citation rate with a lower cluster number indicates that manuscripts are more likely to have been self-drafted. Using the FLCA algorithm, IBPs were successfully generated for each author.

          Conclusion:

          The FLCA algorithm allows for the easy generation of visual IBPs based on authors’ publication profiles. These IBPs incorporate 3 important bibliometric metrics: h-index, x-index, and self-citations. These metrics are highly recommended for use by researchers globally, particularly with the self-citation rate, as they offer valuable insights into the scholarly impact and citation patterns of individual researchers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

          I propose the index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number > or =h, as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis.

              Bibliometric parameters have become an important part of modern assessment of academic productivity. These parameters exist for the purpose of evaluating authors (publication count, citation count, h-index, m-quotient, hc-index, e-index, g-index, i-10 [i-n] index) and journals (impact factor, Eigenfactor, article influence score, SCImago journal rank, source-normalized impact per paper). Although in recent years there has been a proliferation of bibliometric parameters, the true meaning and appropriate use of these parameters is generally not well understood. Effective use of existing and emerging bibliometric tools can aid in assessment of academic productivity, including readiness for promotions and other awards. However, if not properly understood, the data can be misinterpreted and may be subject to manipulation. Familiarity with bibliometric parameters will aid in their effective implementation in the review of authors-whether individuals or groups-and journals, as well as their possible use in the promotions review process, maximizing the effectiveness of bibliometric analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                14 July 2023
                14 July 2023
                : 102
                : 28
                : e34301
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
                [b ] Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
                [c ] Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, ChiMei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
                [d ] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chiali Chi-Mei Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
                [e ] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chung San Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Willy Chou, Chi-Mei Medical Center, 901 Chung Hwa Road, Yung Kung Dist., Tainan 710, Taiwan (e-mail: smilewilly@ 123456mail.chimei.org.tw ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1329-0679
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1132-9341
                Article
                00007
                10.1097/MD.0000000000034301
                10344504
                37443470
                a219bd41-3b0c-4aa1-ba5a-040e6360041c
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 21 May 2023
                : 19 June 2023
                : 21 June 2023
                Categories
                4400
                Research Article
                Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                bibliometric analysis,follower-leading clustering algorithm,h-index,impact beam plot,research profile,x-index. self-citation rate

                Comments

                Comment on this article