0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the english version of the Multidimensional Mentalizing Questionnaire (MMQ)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Mentalizing refers to the ability to understand one’s own and others’ mental states. Mentalizing is considered a key component of social cognition and healthy personality development. A multinational assessment tools able to appraise the multidimensional and multifaceted aspects of this complex construct are needed.

          Objective

          The present study had two aims: (a) validate an English version of the Multidimensional Mentalizing Questionnaire (MMQ, 33 items) which was designed to assess mentalizing based on an integrated and multilevel model of mentalizing; (b) explore the correlational relationships between the six dimensions of the MMQ and a set of sociodemographic, psycho-cognitive, mental health, and socio-functional variables.

          Methods

          Overall, 1823 individuals (age: 19–76 years old [M = 45; SD = 16]; sex: male = 48.51%, female = 50.57%, non-binary = 0.9%) participated in an online survey. While the participants came from 77 different countries, most of them were residents in UK and USA (95%). Data analytics include confirmatory factorial analysis and Pearson correlations.

          Results

          The CFA results validated the factorial structure of a 28-items MMQ-English version, with acceptable goodness of fit indices. Regarding the psychometric properties, the MMQ-English version showed good internal reliability and significant positive correlation with another scale designed to assess an analogue construct showing a fair convergent validity. The findings indicated that males, individuals with lower levels of education, lower socio-economic status, depressed, and with a higher score of loneliness are significantly more likely to report poor mentalizing compared with females, individuals with higher education level, greater SES, happier, and with lower scores of loneliness.

          Conclusion

          The present study validated the English version of the MMQ.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-024-01837-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.

            Most studies of social relationships in later life focus on the amount of social contact, not on individuals' perceptions of social isolation. However, loneliness is likely to be an important aspect of aging. A major limiting factor in studying loneliness has been the lack of a measure suitable for large-scale social surveys. This article describes a short loneliness scale developed specifically for use on a telephone survey. The scale has three items and a simplified set of response categories but appears to measure overall loneliness quite well. The authors also document the relationship between loneliness and several commonly used measures of objective social isolation. As expected, they find that objective and subjective isolation are related. However, the relationship is relatively modest, indicating that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of social relationships are distinct. This result suggests the importance of studying both dimensions of social relationships in the aging process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                germano.vera.cruz@u-picardie.fr
                yasser.khazaal@chuv.ch
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                12 June 2024
                12 June 2024
                2024
                : 12
                : 344
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, CRP-CPO, University of Picardie Jules Verne, ( https://ror.org/01gyxrk03) Amiens, UR 7273 France
                [2 ]Department of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Specialized Facility in Behavioral Addiction ReConnecte, University Hospitals of Geneva, ( https://ror.org/01m1pv723) Geneva, Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, ( https://ror.org/018zpxs61) Bydgoszcz, Poland
                [4 ]GRID grid.444787.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0607 2662, Frontier Medical College, , Bahria University Islamabad, ; Islamabad, Pakistan
                [5 ]GRID grid.8515.9, ISNI 0000 0001 0423 4662, Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, , Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, ; Lausanne, Switzerland
                [6 ]Research Centre, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal and Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Montreal University, ( https://ror.org/0161xgx34) Montreal, Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-6933
                Article
                1837
                10.1186/s40359-024-01837-z
                11167805
                38863069
                a2197809-da86-4d37-aba7-4198dbe90907
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 8 March 2024
                : 30 May 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Lausanne
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                mentalizing,cognition,loneliness,mood,social functioning
                mentalizing, cognition, loneliness, mood, social functioning

                Comments

                Comment on this article