6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The Seraph ®100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter ® (Seraph 100) is an extracorporeal medical countermeasure that can remove many pathogens from blood, including the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of Seraph 100 treatment for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

          Design

          Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study.

          Setting

          Intensive care units across four of thirteen participating sites who have completed data extraction.

          Patients

          Critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with Seraph 100 under an Emergency Use Authorization (n=53) and historical control patients who met criteria for treatment (n=46).

          Intervention

          Extracorporeal treatment with the Seraph 100 filter.

          Measurements and Main Results

          At baseline, the median age was 61 years, 72.7% were male, and 59.6% required mechanical ventilation. The groups were matched in terms of sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation, and other COVID-19 treatments. However, patients in the Seraph 100 group were younger with a median age of 61 years (IQR 42-65) compared to controls who had a median age of 64 (IQR 56-68, p=0.036). The Seraph 100 group also had a lower median Charlson comorbidity index (2, IQR 0-3) compared to control patients (3, IQR 2-4, p=0.006). Mortality was lower in the Seraph 100 treated group compared to the historical controls (37.7% vs 67.4%, respectively, p=0.003). Multivariable logistic regression analysis yielded an odds ratio of 0.27 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.79, p=0.016). Of the 53 patients treated with Seraph 100, only 1 patient experienced a serious adverse event (transient hypotension at the start of the treatment which required a brief period of vasopressor support).

          Conclusions

          These data suggest that broad spectrum, pathogen agnostic, extracorporeal blood purification technologies can be safely and effectively deployed to meet new pathogen threats as an adjunct to standard treatments while awaiting the development of directed pharmacologic therapies and/or vaccines.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          medRxiv
          April 23 2021
          Article
          10.1101/2021.04.20.21255810
          a1b96d81-c497-4e02-8d42-f759b5cce169
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article