0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sustainable production of healthy, affordable food in the UK: The pros and cons of plasticulture

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An evolving green agenda as the UK seeks to achieve ‘net zero’ in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, coupled with our new trading relationship with the European Union, is resulting in new government policies, which will be disruptive to Britain's traditional food and farming practices. These policies encourage sustainable farming and land‐sparing to restore natural habitats and will provide an opportunity to address issues such as high emissions of GHGs and dwindling biodiversity resulting from many intensive agricultural practices. To address these and other food challenges such as global conflicts and health issues, Britain will need a revolution in its food system. The aim of this paper is to make the case for such a food revolution where additional healthy food for the UK population is produced in‐country in specialised production units for fruits and vegetables developed on sites previously considered unsuitable for crop production. High crop productivity can be achieved in low‐cost controlled environments, making extensive use of novel crop science and modern controlled‐environment technology. Such systems must be operated with very limited environmental impact. In recent years, growth in the application of plasticulture in UK horticulture has driven some increases in crop yield, quality and value. However, the environmental cost of plastic production and plastic pollution is regarded as a generational challenge that faces the earth system complex. The distribution of plastic waste is ubiquitous, with a significant pollution load arising from a range of agricultural practices. The primary receptor of agriplastic pollution is agricultural soil. Impacts of microplastics on crop productivity and quality and also on human health are only now being investigated. This paper explores the possibility that we can mitigate the adverse environmental effects of agriplastics and thereby exploit the potential of plasticulture to enhance the productivity and positive health impact of UK horticulture.

          Abstract

          This paper is submitted to the FES Special Issue on Food Security. It focusses on two current issues, namely the need for a food system revolution for the UK and the possibility that UK can become more self‐sufficient in food. The increased production of healthy food (more fruit and vegetables) is particularly important. Possibilities for new food production systems are discussed and there is some focus on the topical issue of plastic pollution with particular reference to methods of protected cropping. The accumulation of microplastics and nanoplastics in agricultural soil is currently causing some environmental and health concerns. In the light of current global challenges the resilience of our food system is important.

          Related collections

          Most cited references113

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality.

              Biodiversity loss has become a global concern as evidence accumulates that it will negatively affect ecosystem services on which society depends. So far, most studies have focused on the ecological consequences of above-ground biodiversity loss; yet a large part of Earth's biodiversity is literally hidden below ground. Whether reductions of biodiversity in soil communities below ground have consequences for the overall performance of an ecosystem remains unresolved. It is important to investigate this in view of recent observations that soil biodiversity is declining and that soil communities are changing upon land use intensification. We established soil communities differing in composition and diversity and tested their impact on eight ecosystem functions in model grassland communities. We show that soil biodiversity loss and simplification of soil community composition impair multiple ecosystem functions, including plant diversity, decomposition, nutrient retention, and nutrient cycling. The average response of all measured ecosystem functions (ecosystem multifunctionality) exhibited a strong positive linear relationship to indicators of soil biodiversity, suggesting that soil community composition is a key factor in regulating ecosystem functioning. Our results indicate that changes in soil communities and the loss of soil biodiversity threaten ecosystem multifunctionality and sustainability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.cusworth@lancaster.ac.uk
                Journal
                Food Energy Secur
                Food Energy Secur
                10.1002/(ISSN)2048-3694
                FES3
                Food and Energy Security
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2048-3694
                06 July 2022
                November 2022
                : 11
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/fes3.v11.4 )
                : e404
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Samuel J. Cusworth, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK.

                Email: s.cusworth@ 123456lancaster.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-630X
                Article
                FES3404 FES3-2022-01-0025.R1
                10.1002/fes3.404
                9787550
                a14f9986-b5fa-474a-b26e-b0a0e990406c
                © 2022 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 April 2022
                : 30 January 2022
                : 25 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 21, Words: 16605
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council , doi 10.13039/501100000268;
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:23.12.2022

                crop production,food security,growing systems,plastic pollution,plasticulture,protected cropping

                Comments

                Comment on this article