5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nivolumab, nabpaclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-escalated locoregional therapy for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: OPTIMA II trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          6011

          Background: Despite the success of anti-PD-1 in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, incorporation in the curative setting with induction therapy has yet to be investigated. Favorable prognosis of human papillomavirus associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has led to interest in treatment de-escalation. OPTIMA 2 evaluated nivolumab (nivo) with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-intensified treatment for locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. We report the primary analysis and outcomes. Methods: OPTIMA 2 enrolled locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC. Nivo, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin were administered for 3 cycles. High-risk (HR) included any of the following: T4, N2c-N3 (AJCC 7 th edition), > 20 pack year smoking history, non-HPV16 subtype; All others were low-risk (LR). Arm A included LR with ≥50% post-induction shrinkage by RECIST received single-modality de-escalation with low-dose radiation (RT) alone (50 Gy) or transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Arm B included HR with ≥50% shrinkage or LR with <50% received intermediate-dose chemoradiation (CRT) to 45-50Gy. Arm C included all others and received regular dose CRT to 70-75Gy. Adjuvant nivo was administered for 6 months. The primary endpoint was deep response rate (DRR) ≥50% shrinkage to induction therapy. Results: From September 2017 until March 2020, 73 patients (pts) were eligible and started treatment. One pt died during induction. The DRR following induction was 70.8% (95% CI 60.3%, 81.3%). Median follow-up 23.1 months. Median age 61 (range 39-85), T4 12.3%, N2c/N3 19.2%, LR 47.9%, and HR 52.1%. De-escalated treatment was administered in 84.9%. Arm A N = 28, Arm B N = 34, and Arm C N = 10. 2-year progression free survival (PFS) for full cohort was 90.4% (95% CI = 79.3%, 95.7%). 2-year PFS for Arms A, B, and C were 96.3%, 85.8%, and 100.0% respectively. 2-year overall survival (OS) for full cohort was 93.3% (95% CI = 82.4%, 97.5%). 2-year OS for Arm A, B, and C were 96.0%, 91.9%, and 100.0% respectively. Among TORS (N = 9), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 66.7%. G-tube rates in Arms A, B, and C were 7.1%, 44.1%, and 75.0% respectively (p = 0.0001). Grade 4 toxicity in arms A, B, and C, were observed in 7.1%, 8.8%, and 10.0% of pts respectively. There were 3 local failures and no distant failures. Conclusions: Nivo/nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin followed by risk/response adaptive de-escalated treatment in locoregionally advanced HPV+ OPC demonstrates excellent survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and enteral feeding rates, including high risk disease. Induction chemoimmunotherapy demonstrates a high rate of deep clinical response and represents a promising de-escalation approach that incorporates anti-PD1 in the definitive setting. High pCR rate was observed following nivo/nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin. Clinical trial information: NCT03107182.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2021
          May 20 2021
          : 39
          : 15_suppl
          : 6011
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [2 ]Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [3 ]The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL;
          [4 ]University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL;
          [5 ]Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [6 ]University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6011
          a13adf99-2a0b-49ce-9ba2-8e47debd7dee
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article