6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have a role in the post-neoadjuvant setting in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the effects of nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, capecitabine, or the combination in changing peripheral immunoscore (PIS) remains unclear. This open-label randomized phase II OXEL study (NCT03487666) aimed to assess the immunologic effects of nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination in terms of the change in PIS (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included the presence of ctDNA, toxicity, clinical outcomes at 2-years and association of ctDNA and PIS with clinical outcomes. Forty-five women with TNBC and residual invasive disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination. Here we show that a combination of nivolumab plus capecitabine leads to a greater increase in PIS from baseline to week 6 (91%) compared with nivolumab (47%) or capecitabine (53%) alone (log-rank p = 0.08), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. In addition, the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with disease recurrence, with no new safety signals in the combination arm. Our results provide efficacy and safety data on this combination in TNBC and support further development of PIS and ctDNA analyses to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

          Abstract

          Post-neoadjuvant treatment options for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include the chemo-drug capecitabine but also immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here the authors report the results of a phase II study of adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual TNBC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Cancer statistics, 2022

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes. Incidence data (through 2018) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2019) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2022, 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States, including approximately 350 deaths per day from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death. Incidence during 2014 through 2018 continued a slow increase for female breast cancer (by 0.5% annually) and remained stable for prostate cancer, despite a 4% to 6% annual increase for advanced disease since 2011. Consequently, the proportion of prostate cancer diagnosed at a distant stage increased from 3.9% to 8.2% over the past decade. In contrast, lung cancer incidence continued to decline steeply for advanced disease while rates for localized-stage increased suddenly by 4.5% annually, contributing to gains both in the proportion of localized-stage diagnoses (from 17% in 2004 to 28% in 2018) and 3-year relative survival (from 21% to 31%). Mortality patterns reflect incidence trends, with declines accelerating for lung cancer, slowing for breast cancer, and stabilizing for prostate cancer. In summary, progress has stagnated for breast and prostate cancers but strengthened for lung cancer, coinciding with changes in medical practice related to cancer screening and/or treatment. More targeted cancer control interventions and investment in improved early detection and treatment would facilitate reductions in cancer mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

            Pathological complete response has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint for prediction of long-term clinical benefit, such as disease-free survival, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). We had four key objectives: to establish the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS, to establish the definition of pathological complete response that correlates best with long-term outcome, to identify the breast cancer subtypes in which pathological complete response is best correlated with long-term outcome, and to assess whether an increase in frequency of pathological complete response between treatment groups predicts improved EFS and OS. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline for clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. To be eligible, studies had to meet three inclusion criteria: include at least 200 patients with primary breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery; have available data for pathological complete response, EFS, and OS; and have a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We compared the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response--ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is--for their association with EFS and OS in a responder analysis. We assessed the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS in various subgroups. Finally, we did a trial-level analysis to assess whether pathological complete response could be used as a surrogate endpoint for EFS or OS. We obtained data from 12 identified international trials and 11 955 patients were included in our responder analysis. Eradication of tumour from both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0) was better associated with improved EFS (ypT0 ypN0: hazard ratio [HR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·51; ypT0/is ypN0: 0·48, 0·43-0·54) and OS (0·36, 0·30-0·44; 0·36, 0·31-0·42) than was tumour eradication from the breast alone (ypT0/is; EFS: HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·55-0·66; OS 0·51, 0·45-0·58). We used the ypT0/is ypN0 definition for all subsequent analyses. The association between pathological complete response and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (EFS: HR 0·24, 95% CI 0·18-0·33; OS: 0·16, 0·11-0·25) and in those with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative tumours who received trastuzumab (EFS: 0·15, 0·09-0·27; OS: 0·08, 0·03, 0·22). In the trial-level analysis, we recorded little association between increases in frequency of pathological complete response and EFS (R(2)=0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25) and OS (R(2)=0·24, 0·00-0·70). Patients who attain pathological complete response defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0 have improved survival. The prognostic value is greatest in aggressive tumour subtypes. Our pooled analysis could not validate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for improved EFS and OS. US Food and Drug Administration. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Breast Cancer Treatment

              Breast cancer will be diagnosed in 12% of women in the United States over the course of their lifetimes and more than 250 000 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the United States in 2017. This review focuses on current approaches and evolving strategies for local and systemic therapy of breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Filipa_Lynce@dfci.harvard.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                27 March 2024
                27 March 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 2691
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ( https://ror.org/02jzgtq86) Boston, MA USA
                [2 ]Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, ( https://ror.org/05rgrbr06) Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [4 ]MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/03ja1ak26) Washington, DC USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.417768.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0483 9129, Center for Immuno-Oncology, , Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                [6 ]Georgetown University, ( https://ror.org/05vzafd60) Washington, DC USA
                [7 ]NeoGenomics, ( https://ror.org/04vj14y69) Durham, NC USA
                [8 ]MedStar Washington Hospital Center, ( https://ror.org/05ry42w04) Washington, DC USA
                [9 ]Tufts Medical Center, ( https://ror.org/002hsbm82) Boston, MA USA
                [10 ]University of Chicago, ( https://ror.org/024mw5h28) Chicago, IL USA
                [11 ]Hackensack University Medical Center, ( https://ror.org/008zj0x80) Hackensack, NJ USA
                [12 ]University of Alabama at Birmingham, ( https://ror.org/008s83205) Birmingham, AL USA
                [13 ]GRID grid.418152.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0543 9493, AstraZeneca, ; Arlington, VA USA
                [14 ]GRID grid.280502.d, ISNI 0000 0000 8741 3625, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [15 ]Inova, Fairfax, VA USA
                [16 ]The Ohio State University, ( https://ror.org/00rs6vg23) Columbus, OH USA
                [17 ]GRID grid.418152.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0543 9493, Present Address: AstraZeneca, ; Arlington, VA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-7076
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-7101
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-3073
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-9899
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-0294
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-0400
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9000-9855
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-4072
                http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8847-7223
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-5052
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0876
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-6984
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-6809
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-4693
                http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0274-2150
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-1644
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-8649
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-0228
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-8671
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-3830
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-6612
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-1260
                Article
                46961
                10.1038/s41467-024-46961-x
                10973408
                38538574
                a1252219-1dac-4c36-990e-8dd0595ec4e0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 January 2023
                : 15 March 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100008064, Georgetown University;
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                breast cancer,translational research,cancer immunotherapy
                Uncategorized
                breast cancer, translational research, cancer immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article