2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex‐Specific Considerations in Degenerative Aortic Stenosis for Female‐Tailored Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation Management

      review-article
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , 9 , 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 1 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 ,
      Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      aortic stenosis, clinical management, device selection, sex differences, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, Aortic Valve Replacement/Transcather Aortic Valve Implantation, Catheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions, Treatment, Women

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The impact of sex on pathophysiological processes, clinical presentation, treatment options, as well as outcomes of degenerative aortic stenosis remain poorly understood. Female patients are well represented in transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) trials and appear to derive favorable outcomes with TAVI. However, higher incidences of major bleeding, vascular complications, and stroke have been reported in women following TAVI. The anatomical characteristics and pathophysiological features of aortic stenosis in women might guide a tailored planning of the percutaneous approach. We highlight whether a sex‐based TAVI management strategy might impact on clinical outcomes. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of sex from diagnosis to treatment of degenerative aortic stenosis, discussing the latest evidence on epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, therapeutic options, and outcomes. Furthermore, we focused on technical sex‐oriented considerations in TAVI including the preprocedural screening, device selection, implantation strategy, and postprocedural management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references100

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

          Among patients with aortic stenosis who are at intermediate or high risk for death with surgery, major outcomes are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement. There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparison of the two procedures in patients who are at low risk.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

              Previous trials have shown that among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, survival rates are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement. We evaluated the two procedures in a randomized trial involving intermediate-risk patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                chieffo.alaide@hsr.it
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                29 September 2022
                04 October 2022
                : 11
                : 19 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.v11.19 )
                : e025944
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Cardiac, Thoracic Vascular Science and Public Health, University of Padova Italy
                [ 2 ] Department of Cardiology Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Federico II University of Naples Italy
                [ 4 ] Interventional Cardiology Unit IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
                [ 5 ] Groupe CardioVasculaire Interventionnel Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France
                [ 6 ] Cardiology Department European Hospital Georges Pompidou Paris France
                [ 7 ] Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER Massy France
                [ 8 ] Keele Cardiovascular Research Group School of Medicine, Keele University Stoke‐on‐Trent United Kingdom
                [ 9 ] Department of Cardiology Royal Stoke University Hospital Stoke‐on‐Trent United Kingdom
                [ 10 ] Department of Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia PA
                [ 11 ] Cardiology Department Rouen University Hospital Rouen France
                [ 12 ] Cardiothoracovascular Department Ospedale di Circolo, ASST Sette Laghi Varese Italy
                [ 13 ] Division of Interventional Cardiology Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi Salerno Italy
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence to: Alaide Chieffo, MD, FESC, Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132 Milan, Italy. Email: chieffo.alaide@ 123456hsr.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-6824
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-6914
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-8890
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-4642
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2877
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-7127
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-9112
                Article
                JAH37758 JAHA/2022/025944-T
                10.1161/JAHA.121.025944
                9673730
                36172929
                a0b396d1-44d5-4a8e-af9a-cb9361b20018
                © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 03 May 2022
                : 01 March 2022
                : 28 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 15, Words: 10154
                Funding
                Funded by: Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology
                Categories
                Contemporary Review
                Contemporary Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                04 October 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:17.10.2022

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                aortic stenosis,clinical management,device selection,sex differences,transcatheter aortic valve implantation,aortic valve replacement/transcather aortic valve implantation,catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions,treatment,women

                Comments

                Comment on this article