40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

          To review the history, development, and current applications of robotics in surgery. Surgical robotics is a new technology that holds significant promise. Robotic surgery is often heralded as the new revolution, and it is one of the most talked about subjects in surgery today. Up to this point in time, however, the drive to develop and obtain robotic devices has been largely driven by the market. There is no doubt that they will become an important tool in the surgical armamentarium, but the extent of their use is still evolving. A review of the literature was undertaken using Medline. Articles describing the history and development of surgical robots were identified as were articles reporting data on applications. Several centers are currently using surgical robots and publishing data. Most of these early studies report that robotic surgery is feasible. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding costs and benefits of robotics versus conventional techniques. Robotic surgery is still in its infancy and its niche has not yet been well defined. Its current practical uses are mostly confined to smaller surgical procedures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop?

            Machine learning (ML) is the fastest growing field in computer science, and health informatics is among the greatest challenges. The goal of ML is to develop algorithms which can learn and improve over time and can be used for predictions. Most ML researchers concentrate on automatic machine learning (aML), where great advances have been made, for example, in speech recognition, recommender systems, or autonomous vehicles. Automatic approaches greatly benefit from big data with many training sets. However, in the health domain, sometimes we are confronted with a small number of data sets or rare events, where aML-approaches suffer of insufficient training samples. Here interactive machine learning (iML) may be of help, having its roots in reinforcement learning, preference learning, and active learning. The term iML is not yet well used, so we define it as “algorithms that can interact with agents and can optimize their learning behavior through these interactions, where the agents can also be human.” This “human-in-the-loop” can be beneficial in solving computationally hard problems, e.g., subspace clustering, protein folding, or k-anonymization of health data, where human expertise can help to reduce an exponential search space through heuristic selection of samples. Therefore, what would otherwise be an NP-hard problem, reduces greatly in complexity through the input and the assistance of a human agent involved in the learning phase.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
                Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg
                Wiley
                14785951
                February 2019
                February 2019
                January 09 2019
                : 15
                : 1
                : e1968
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina; Universidade de São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
                [2 ]Research Center in Law, Ethics and Procedures, Faculty of Law of Douai; University of Artois; France
                [3 ]Department of History and Philosophy of Science; University of Pittsburgh; Pennsylvania
                [4 ]Department of Computing and Mathematics, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science; University of South Wales; UK
                [5 ]Department of Computer Science; Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore Maryland
                [6 ]Department of Jurisprudence; University of Turin; Italy
                [7 ]Secure Business Austria, SBA Research gGmbH; Vienna Austria
                [8 ]Holzinger Group, HCI-KDD; Institute for Medical Informatics/Statistics. Medical University of Graz; Austria
                [9 ]Department of Upper GI Surgery; Wirral University Teaching Hospital; UK
                [10 ]Department of Surgery and Cancer and Institute of Global Health Innovation Imperial College London; UK
                Article
                10.1002/rcs.1968
                30397993
                a09c84f6-42f0-4e68-92be-7025d3d8fc64
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article