14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health policy triangle framework: Narrative review of the recent literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Developed in the late 20th century, the health policy triangle (HPT) is a policy analysis framework used and applied ubiquitously in the literature to analyse a large number of health-related issues.

          Objective

          To explore and summarise the application of the HPT framework to health-related (public) policy decisions in the recent literature.

          Methods

          This narrative review consisted of a systematic search and summary of included articles from January 2015 January 2020. Six electronic databases were searched. Included studies were required to use the HPT framework as part of their policy analysis. Data were analysed using principles of thematic analysis.

          Results

          Of the 2217 studies which were screened for inclusion, the final review comprised of 54 studies, mostly qualitative in nature. Five descriptive categorised themes emerged (i) health human resources, services and systems, (ii) communicable and non-communicable diseases, (iii) physical and mental health, (iv) antenatal and postnatal care and (v) miscellaneous. Most studies were conducted in lower to upper-middle income countries.

          Conclusion

          This review identified that the types of health policies analysed were almost all positioned at national or international level and primarily concerned public health issues. Given its generalisable nature, future research that applies the HPT framework to smaller scale health policy decisions investigated at local and regional levels, could be beneficial.

          Highlights

          • In 1994, the health policy triangle was first described in the literature.

          • Its generalisable nature allows for analysis of many diverse health-related topics.

          • In recent years, its utilisation in low and middle-income countries has increased.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

              Background There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research. This paper reports on the use of this type of analysis in systematic reviews to bring together and integrate the findings of multiple qualitative studies. Methods We describe thematic synthesis, outline several steps for its conduct and illustrate the process and outcome of this approach using a completed review of health promotion research. Thematic synthesis has three stages: the coding of text 'line-by-line'; the development of 'descriptive themes'; and the generation of 'analytical themes'. While the development of descriptive themes remains 'close' to the primary studies, the analytical themes represent a stage of interpretation whereby the reviewers 'go beyond' the primary studies and generate new interpretive constructs, explanations or hypotheses. The use of computer software can facilitate this method of synthesis; detailed guidance is given on how this can be achieved. Results We used thematic synthesis to combine the studies of children's views and identified key themes to explore in the intervention studies. Most interventions were based in school and often combined learning about health benefits with 'hands-on' experience. The studies of children's views suggested that fruit and vegetables should be treated in different ways, and that messages should not focus on health warnings. Interventions that were in line with these suggestions tended to be more effective. Thematic synthesis enabled us to stay 'close' to the results of the primary studies, synthesising them in a transparent way, and facilitating the explicit production of new concepts and hypotheses. Conclusion We compare thematic synthesis to other methods for the synthesis of qualitative research, discussing issues of context and rigour. Thematic synthesis is presented as a tried and tested method that preserves an explicit and transparent link between conclusions and the text of primary studies; as such it preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviewing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Policy Open
                Health Policy Open
                Health Policy OPEN
                Elsevier
                2590-2296
                06 October 2020
                December 2020
                06 October 2020
                : 1
                : 100016
                Affiliations
                [a ]Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
                [b ]Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
                [c ]National Finance Division, Health Service Executive, Model Business Park, Model Farm Road, Cork, Ireland
                [d ]Department of Accounting and Finance, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Room 2.01, Cavanagh Pharmacy Building, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland. gary_obrien@ 123456umail.ucc.ie
                Article
                S2590-2296(20)30014-9 100016
                10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100016
                10297800
                37383316
                a083d81d-ff31-493f-99c6-5975430d9fc2
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 June 2020
                : 1 September 2020
                : 14 September 2020
                Categories
                Review

                health policy,policy analysis,health policy framework,policy triangle model,literature review

                Comments

                Comment on this article