16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Understanding the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Small Businesses and Workers Using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has simultaneously exacerbated and elucidated inequities in resource distribution for small businesses across the United States in terms of worker health and the financial stability of both owners and employees. This disparity was further intensified by the constantly changing and sometimes opposing health and safety guidelines and recommendations to businesses from the local, state, and federal government agencies. To better understand how the pandemic has impacted small businesses, a cross-sectional survey was administered to owners, managers, and workers ( n = 45) in the beauty and auto shop sectors from Southern Arizona. The survey identified barriers to safe operation that these businesses faced during the pandemic, illuminated worker concerns about COVID-19, and elicited perceptions of how workplaces have changed since the novel coronavirus outbreak of 2019. A combination of open-ended and close-ended questions explored how businesses adapted to the moving target of pandemic safety recommendations, as well as how the pandemic affected businesses and workers more generally. Almost all the beauty salons surveyed had to close their doors (22/25), either temporarily or permanently, due to COVID-19, while most of the auto repair shops were able to stay open (13/20). Beauty salons were more likely to implement exposure controls meant to limit transmission with customers and coworkers, such as wearing face masks and disallowing walk-ins, and were also more likely to be affected by pandemic-related issues, such as reduced client load and sourcing difficulties. Auto shops, designated by the state of Arizona to be ‘essential’ businesses, were less likely to have experienced financial precarity due to the pandemic. Content analysis of open-ended questions using the social-ecological model documented current and future worker concerns, namely financial hardships from lockdowns and the long-term viability of their business, unwillingness of employees to return to work, uncertainty regarding the progression of the pandemic, conflict over suitable health and safety protocols, and personal or family health and well-being (including anxiety and/or stress). Findings from the survey indicate that small businesses did not have clear guidance from policymakers during the pandemic and that the enacted regulations and guidelines focused on either health and safety or finances, but rarely both. Businesses often improvised and made potentially life-changing decisions with little to no support. This analysis can be used to inform future pandemic preparedness plans for small businesses that are cost-efficient, effective at reducing environmental exposures, and ultimately more likely to be implemented by the workers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry.

          The experience of burnout has been the focus of much research during the past few decades. Measures have been developed, as have various theoretical models, and research studies from many countries have contributed to a better understanding of the causes and consequences of this occupationally-specific dysphoria. The majority of this work has focused on human service occupations, and particularly health care. Research on the burnout experience for psychiatrists mirrors much of the broader literature, in terms of both sources and outcomes of burnout. But it has also identified some of the unique stressors that mental health professionals face when they are dealing with especially difficult or violent clients. Current issues of particular relevance for psychiatry include the links between burnout and mental illness, the attempts to redefine burnout as simply exhaustion, and the relative dearth of evaluative research on potential interventions to treat and/or prevent burnout. Given that the treatment goal for burnout is usually to enable people to return to their job, and to be successful in their work, psychiatry could make an important contribution by identifying the treatment strategies that would be most effective in achieving that goal.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States

            Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minority groups, with high rates of death in African American, Native American, and LatinX communities. While the mechanisms of these disparities are being investigated, they can be conceived as arising from biomedical factors as well as social determinants of health. Minority groups are disproportionately affected by chronic medical conditions and lower access to healthcare that may portend worse COVID-19 outcomes. Furthermore, minority communities are more likely to experience living and working conditions that predispose them to worse outcomes. Underpinning these disparities are long-standing structural and societal factors that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed. Clinicians can partner with patients and communities to reduce the short-term impact of COVID-19 disparities while advocating for structural change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations

              Significance Drawing on a survey of more than 5,800 small businesses, this paper provides insight into the economic impact of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) on small businesses. The results shed light on both the financial fragility of many small businesses, and the significant impact COVID-19 had on these businesses in the weeks after the COVID-19–related disruptions began. The results also provide evidence on businesses’ expectations about the longer-term impact of COVID-19, as well as their perceptions of relief programs offered by the government.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann Work Expo Health
                Ann Work Expo Health
                annhyg
                Annals of Work Exposures and Health
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                2398-7308
                2398-7316
                16 July 2022
                16 July 2022
                : wxac048
                Affiliations
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Sonora Environmental Research Institute , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Sonora Environmental Research Institute , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Epidemiology and Biostatitics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Sonora Environmental Research Institute , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                Author notes
                Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 520-626-0006; e-mail: jhonan@ 123456arizona.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8293-9625
                Article
                wxac048
                10.1093/annweh/wxac048
                9384486
                35849088
                a079752d-5450-45c6-8294-a9d27c4191e3
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 05 January 2022
                : 06 May 2022
                : 21 June 2022
                : 27 June 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: R01ES028250
                Award ID: P30ES006694
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00640
                Custom metadata
                PAP

                covid-19 pandemic,small business,cross-sectional survey,occupational health and safety,community-engaged research,social-ecological model,environmental exposures

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                11
                2
                12
                0
                Smart Citations
                11
                2
                12
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content81

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors267