29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Lest we forget: Comparing retrospective and prospective assessments of adverse childhood experiences in the prediction of adult health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs; e.g., abuse, neglect, parental loss, etc.) have been associated with increased risk for later-life disease and dysfunction using adults’ retrospective self-reports of ACEs. Research should test whether associations between ACEs and health outcomes are the same for prospective and retrospective ACE measures.

          Methods

          We estimated agreement between ACEs prospectively-recorded throughout childhood (by Study staff at Study member ages 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15) and retrospectively-recalled in adulthood (by Study members when they reached age 38), in the population-representative Dunedin cohort (N=1,037). We related both retrospective and prospective ACE measures to physical, mental, cognitive, and social health at midlife measured through both objective (e.g., biomarkers and neuropsychological tests) and subjective (e.g., self-reported) means.

          Results

          Dunedin and CDC ACE distributions were similar. Retrospective and prospective measures of adversity showed moderate agreement ( r=.47, p<.001; weighted Kappa = .31, 95% CI: .27–.35). Both associated with all midlife outcomes. As compared to prospective ACEs, retrospective ACEs showed stronger associations with life outcomes that were subjectively assessed, and weaker associations with life outcomes that were objectively assessed. Recalled ACEs and poor subjective outcomes were correlated regardless of whether prospectively-recorded ACEs were evident. Individuals who recalled more ACEs than had been prospectively recorded were more neurotic than average, and individuals who recalled fewer ACEs than recorded were more agreeable.

          Conclusions

          Prospective ACE records confirm associations between childhood adversity and negative life outcomes found previously using retrospective ACE reports. However, more agreeable and neurotic dispositions may respectively bias retrospective ACE measures toward underestimating the impact of adversity on objectively-measured life outcomes and overestimating the impact of adversity on self-reported outcomes. Associations between personality factors and the propensity to recall adversity were extremely modest and warrant further investigation. Risk predictions based on retrospective ACE reports should utilize objective outcome measures. Where objective outcome measurements are difficult to obtain, correction factors may be warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity.

          Current knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) relies on data predominantly collected from white, middle- / upper-middle-class participants and focuses on experiences within the home. Using a more socioeconomically and racially diverse urban population, Conventional and Expanded (community-level) ACEs were measured to help understand whether Conventional ACEs alone can sufficiently measure adversity, particularly among various subgroups.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: overview of the first 40 years, with an eye to the future

              The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study began more than four decades ago. Unusual at the time, it was founded as a multidisciplinary research enterprise, and was strongly supported by the Dunedin community, both professional and lay, in its early years. Seven research themes have evolved over the past 40 years focusing on mental health and neuro-cognition, cardiovascular risk, respiratory health, oral health, sexual and reproductive health, and psychosocial functioning. A seventh, more applied theme, seeks to maximise the value of the Study findings for New Zealand’s indigenous people—Māori (or tangata whenua transl people of the land). The study has published over 1200 papers and reports to date, with almost 2/3 of these being in peer-reviewed journals. Here we provide an overview of the study, its history, leadership structure, scientific approach, operational foci, and some recent examples of work that illustrate the following: (a) the value of multidisciplinary data; (b) how the study is well positioned to address contemporary issues; and (c) how research can simultaneously address multiple audiences—from researchers and theoreticians to policy makers and practitioners. Near-future research plans are described, and we end by reflecting upon the core aspects of the study that portend future useful contributions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0375361
                4604
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
                0021-9630
                1469-7610
                7 January 2017
                October 2016
                01 October 2017
                : 57
                : 10
                : 1103-1112
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
                [2 ]Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
                [3 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
                [4 ]Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College, London, UK
                [5 ]Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
                [7 ]United States Army, Fort Bragg, NC, USA
                [8 ]Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
                [9 ]Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neurosciene, King’s College, London, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Aaron Reuben, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708. Tel: (843) 670-6084. aaron.reuben@ 123456duke.edu
                Article
                PMC5234278 PMC5234278 5234278 nihpa841021
                10.1111/jcpp.12621
                5234278
                27647050
                a002cd84-508f-4326-8a66-55a9fd9b3e99
                History
                Categories
                Article

                epidemiology,Adverse childhood experiences,physical health,mental health,cognitive health

                Comments

                Comment on this article