35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the S-ReSC Scoring System to Predict Stone-Free Status after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) scoring system was developed to predict the stone-free rate (SFR) after single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study is an external validation of this scoring system.

          Materials and methods

          A retrospective review included 327 patients who underwent PCNL at 2 tertiary referral centers. The S-ReSC score was assigned from 1 to 9 based on the number of sites involved. The stone free status was defined as either complete clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments <4 mm in size at 1 month follow-up imaging. Inter-observer and test-retest reliabilities were evaluated. The statistical performance of the prediction model was assessed by its predictive accuracy, predictive probability, and clinical usefulness.

          Results

          The overall SFR was 65.4%. SFRs were 83.9%, 47.6%, and 21.4% in low (1–2), intermediate (3–4), and high (5–9) score groups, respectively, with significant differences ( P<0.001). Inter-observer and test-retest reliabilities revealed almost perfect agreements. External validation of the S-ReSC scoring system revealed an AUC of 0.731 (95% CI 0.675–0.788). The AUC of 3-titered S-ReSC score groups was 0.691 (95% CI, 0.629–0.753). The calibration plot showed that the predicted probability of SFR had a concordance comparable to that of the observed frequency. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic revealed an adequate performance of the predictive model ( P = 0.10). Inter-observer and test-retest reliability showed a good level of agreement.

          Conclusions

          The S-ReSC scoring system is useful in predicting the post-PCNL SFR and in describing the complexity of renal stones.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Guy's stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures.

          To report the development and validation of a scoring system, the Guy's stone score, to grade the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Currently, no standardized method is available to predict the stone-free rate after PCNL. The Guy's stone score was developed through a combination of expert opinion, published data review, and iterative testing. It comprises 4 grades: grade I, solitary stone in mid/lower pole or solitary stone in the pelvis with simple anatomy; grade II, solitary stone in upper pole or multiple stones in a patient with simple anatomy or a solitary stone in a patient with abnormal anatomy; grade III, multiple stones in a patient with abnormal anatomy or stones in a caliceal diverticulum or partial staghorn calculus; grade IV, staghorn calculus or any stone in a patient with spina bifida or spinal injury. It was assessed for reproducibility using the kappa coefficient and validated on a prospective database of 100 PCNL procedures performed in a tertiary stone center. The complications were graded using the modified Clavien score. The clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively and assessed with multivariate analysis. The Guy's stone score was the only factor that significantly and independently predicted the stone-free rate (P = .01). It was found to be reproducible, with good inter-rater agreement (P = .81). None of the other factors tested, including stone burden, operating surgeon, patient weight, age, and comorbidity, correlated with the stone-free rate. The Guy's stone score accurately predicted the stone-free rate after PCNL. It was easy to use and reproducible. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors.

            We identified risk factors predicting severe bleeding due to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Computerized data on 2,909 patients who underwent a total of 3,878 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures between January 1995 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patients who experienced severe bleeding requiring angiographic renal embolization were compared with those on other patients using univariate and multivariate analyses. We tested the characteristics of patients, kidneys and stones together with details of the operative procedure and surgeon experience. Severe bleeding complicated a total of 39 procedures (1%) in 25 males and 14 females with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.6 years. Associated morbidity included shock in 6 patients and perirenal hematoma in 4. Renal angiography revealed pseudoaneurysm in 20 patients, arteriovenous fistula in 9, the 2 lesions in 8 and arterial laceration in 2. Bleeding could be controlled with superselective embolization in 36 patients (92.3%). Followup was available on 33 patients (mean 21 +/- 15 months). Renal function was stable in all patients except 3 who had a post-embolization increase in serum creatinine, of whom all had a solitary kidney and none required renal replacement therapy. Significant risk factors for severe bleeding were upper caliceal puncture, solitary kidney, staghorn stone, multiple punctures and inexperienced surgeon. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be performed by an experienced endourologist in patients at risk for severe bleeding, such as those with a solitary kidney or staghorn stones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery.

              Percutaneous renal surgery is currently performed for complex renal calculi as well as for various other endourological indications. In many patients an upper pole nephrostomy tract allows direct access to most of the intrarenal collecting system. Upper pole percutaneous access may be obtained via the supracostal or subcostal approach. The preferred route depends on the location and size of the specific stone or lesion. Previously others have cautioned against the supracostal approach above the 12th rib and many have discouraged an approach above the 11th rib due to concern about the increased risk of intrathoracic complications. We retrospectively assessed the morbidity associated with supracostal percutaneous renal surgery and compared and analyzed the morbidity of the supracostal and subcostal approaches. The records of all patients who underwent upper pole percutaneous renal surgery between November 1993 and July 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 240 patients underwent percutaneous renal procedures, including 225 for managing symptomatic renal or ureteral stones, that is nonstaghorn calculi in 157, staghorn calculi in 41, proximal ureteral calculi in 12, calculi within a caliceal diverticulum in 6, calculi associated with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 5 and calculi associated with a retained ureteral stent in 4. An additional 15 procedures were done for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (7), intrarenal collecting system tumors (5), a caliceal diverticulum without stones (1), a retained ureteral stent (1) and a ureteral stricture (1). A total of 300 nephrostomy tracts were placed to obtain access to the intrarenal collecting system via the supracostal approach in 98 (32.7%) cases and the subcostal approach in 202 (67.3%). Of the supracostal approaches 72 (73.5%) tracts were above the 12th and 26 (26.5%) were above the 11th rib. The overall complication rate irrespective of percutaneous approach was 8.3% (16.3% for supracostal and 4.5% for subcostal access). Complications included blood transfusion in 7 patients, intraoperative hemothorax/hydrothorax in 5, sepsis/bacteremia in 3, atrial fibrillation in 2, delayed nephropleural fistula in 2, renal artery pseudoaneurysm in 2, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus in 2, pneumothorax in 1 and subcapsular hematoma in 1. Seven of 8 intrathoracic complications (87.5%) developed in supracostal cases. Percutaneous renal surgery remains an important option for managing complex renal calculi and other upper urinary tract lesions. In our experience it is generally associated with low morbidity. The supracostal approach is often preferred for obtaining intrarenal access to complex renal and proximal ureteral pathology. Because supracostal access tracts are associated with significantly higher intrathoracic and overall complication rates compared to subcostal access tracts, this approach must be used with caution when no other alternatives are available.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                8 January 2014
                : 9
                : 1
                : e83628
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
                Eberhard-Karls University, Germany
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MSC SYC CWJ. Performed the experiments: MSC SYC JHJ SBL HJ HS. Analyzed the data: MSC SYC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SYC SBL HHK SJO. Wrote the paper: MSC SYC.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-35668
                10.1371/journal.pone.0083628
                3885452
                24421896
                9fdd38e5-4b3d-4ef5-9a29-1166c0ddca62
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 August 2013
                : 6 November 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                These authors have no support or funding to report.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Renal System
                Clinical Research Design
                Retrospective Studies
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Clinical Laboratory Sciences
                Test Evaluation
                Non-Clinical Medicine
                Health Care Policy
                Health Statistics
                Surgery
                Minimally Invasive Surgery
                Urology
                Endourology
                Kidney Stones

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content603

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors152