5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Depressive symptoms in the general population before and in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the GEDA 2019/2020 study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Study results on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the first year of the pandemic are contradictory. The GEDA 2019/2020 study makes it possible to examine changes in depressive symptoms in the population.

          Methods

          A standardised telephone interview was used to survey a random sample of the population in Germany aged 15 and older. To exclude seasonal effects, 10,220 interviewees from the period April 2019 to January 2020 were compared with 11,900 from the period April 2020 to January 2021. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the internationally established 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8).

          Results

          The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased from 9.2% to 7.6% in the first year of the pandemic. Changes differ between women and men as well as between age and education groups. The analysis of individual symptoms suggests that it is not about a reduction of mental disorders of the depressive type in the narrower sense, but rather a decrease in stress-associated individual symptoms.

          Conclusions

          The decrease in stress-associated depressive symptoms in parts of the population can be interpreted as an indication that pandemic-related changes in everyday life and the working environment may have had a positive effect on individual areas of mental health in certain groups, at least temporarily in the first year of the pandemic. The continuing strong social inequality in depressive symptoms to the disadvantage of low education groups confirms that the need for social situation-related health promotion and prevention with regard to the living and working conditions of socially disadvantaged people must not be lost sight of in times of pandemic. For groups in the population that partly showed a worsening of symptoms in this phase of the pandemic, e.g. the diminished ability to concentrate of very old men, targeted support options should be created in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.

          The eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) is established as a valid diagnostic and severity measure for depressive disorders in large clinical studies. Our objectives were to assess the PHQ-8 as a depression measure in a large, epidemiological population-based study, and to determine the comparability of depression as defined by the PHQ-8 diagnostic algorithm vs. a PHQ-8 cutpoint > or = 10. Random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 198,678 participants in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), a population-based survey in the United States. Current depression as defined by either the DSM-IV based diagnostic algorithm (i.e., major depressive or other depressive disorder) of the PHQ-8 or a PHQ-8 score > or = 10; respondent sociodemographic characteristics; number of days of impairment in the past 30 days in multiple domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The prevalence of current depression was similar whether defined by the diagnostic algorithm or a PHQ-8 score > or = 10 (9.1% vs. 8.6%). Depressed patients had substantially more days of impairment across multiple domains of HRQoL, and the impairment was nearly identical in depressed groups defined by either method. Of the 17,040 respondents with a PHQ-8 score > or = 10, major depressive disorder was present in 49.7%, other depressive disorder in 23.9%, depressed mood or anhedonia in another 22.8%, and no evidence of depressive disorder or depressive symptoms in only 3.5%. The PHQ-8 diagnostic algorithm rather than an independent structured psychiatric interview was used as the criterion standard. The PHQ-8 is a useful depression measure for population-based studies, and either its diagnostic algorithm or a cutpoint > or = 10 can be used for defining current depression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coping behaviors associated with decreased anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown

            HIGHLIGHTS • Survey of 5545 Spanish adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. • Sixty-five percent of the sample reported anxiety or depressive symptoms. • Healthy diet and not reading too many COVID-19 news predicted lower symptoms. • Following routine, hobbies and staying outdoors predicted lower depressive symptoms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Reported Health : Early Evidence From the German National Cohort

              Background The pandemic caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the countermeasures taken to protect the public are having a substantial effect on the health of the population. In Germany, nationwide protective measures to halt the spread of the virus were implemented in mid-March for 6 weeks. Methods In May, the impact of the pandemic was assessed in the German National Cohort (NAKO). A total of 113 928 men and women aged 20 to 74 years at the time of the baseline examination conducted 1 to 5 years earlier (53%) answered, within a 30-day period, a follow-up questionnaire on SARS-CoV-2 test status, COVID-19-associated symptoms, and self-perceived health status. Results The self-reported SARS-CoV-2 test frequency among the probands was 4.6%, and 344 participants (0.3%) reported a positive test result. Depressive and anxiety-related symptoms increased relative to baseline only in participants under 60 years of age, particularly in young women. The rate of moderate to severe depressive symptoms increased from 6.4% to 8.8%. Perceived stress increased in all age groups and both sexes, especially in the young. The scores for mental state and self-rated health worsened in participants tested for SARS-CoV-2 compared with those who were not tested. In 32% of the participants, however, self-rated health improved. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic and the protective measures during the first wave had effects on mental health and on self-rated general health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Monit
                J Health Monit
                JoHM
                Journal of Health Monitoring
                Robert Koch Institute (Nordufer 20 13353 Berlin, Germany )
                2511-2708
                20 December 2022
                December 2022
                : 7
                : 4
                : 3-21
                Affiliations
                Robert Koch Institute , Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
                Author notes
                Corresponding author Dr Ulfert Hapke, Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, General-Pape-Str. 62–66, 12101 Berlin, Germany, E-mail: HapkeU@ 123456rki.de
                Article
                10.25646/10664
                9838134
                36654684
                9fbf0d23-98d6-4c52-88f6-c6c36984c046
                © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 12 August 2022
                : 05 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: Robert Koch Institute
                Award Recipient : GEDA 2019/2020
                Funded by: Federal Ministry of Health
                Award Recipient : GEDA 2019/2020
                Funded by: German Research Foundation
                Award ID: 458531028
                Award Recipient : GEDA 2019/2020
                GEDA 2019/2020 was funded by the Robert Koch Institute and the Federal Ministry of Health. This contribution was additionally funded by the German Research Foundation (Project number 458531028).
                Categories
                Focus

                covid-19 pandemic,depression,mental health,resilience,age,phq-8
                covid-19 pandemic, depression, mental health, resilience, age, phq-8

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content119

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors3,162