16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of fertility education on knowledge, desires and anxiety among the reproductive-aged population: findings from a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          STUDY QUESTION

          What are the effects of fertility education on knowledge, childbearing desires and anxiety?

          SUMMARY ANSWER

          Providing fertility information contributed to greater knowledge, but increased anxiety.

          WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

          Past studies have found that exposure to educational material improved fertility awareness and changed desires toward childbearing and its timing. Existing educational websites with evidence-based medical information provided in a non-judgmental manner have received favorable responses from reproductive-aged men and women.

          STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

          This three-armed (one intervention and two control groups), randomized controlled trial was conducted using online social research panels (SRPs) in Japan in January 2015.

          PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

          A total of 1455 participants (726 men and 729 women) between 20 and 39 years of age who hoped to have (more) children in the future were block-randomized and exposed to one of three information brochures: fertility education (intervention group), intake of folic acid during pregnancy (control group 1) or governmental financial support for pregnancy and childbirth (control group 2). Fertility knowledge was measured with the Japanese version of the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-J). Knowledge, child-number and child-timing desires, subjective anxiety (i.e. whether participants felt anxiety [primary outcome]), and scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were assessed immediately after exposure. Non-inferiority comparisons were performed on subjective anxiety with non-inferiority declared if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk difference did not exceed a margin of 0.15. This test for non-inferiority was only performed for subjective anxiety; all the other variables were tests of superiority.

          MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

          Posttest scores on the CFKS-J (mean, SD) were higher in the intervention group than that of the control groups: intervention versus Control 1 and versus Control 2: 52.8 (28.8) versus 40.9 (26.2) ( P< 0.001) versus 45.1 (27.1) ( P = 0.003) among men and 64.6 (26.0) versus 50.8 (26.9) ( P< 0.001) versus 53.0 (26.4) ( P< 0.001) among women.

          The percentage of participants who felt subjective anxiety after exposure to the intervention brochure was significantly higher than that of the control groups: intervention versus Control 1 and versus Control 2: 32.6 versus 17.8% (risk difference [RD] = 0.149, 95% CI: 0.073–0.225) versus 14.5% (RD = 0.182, 95% CI: 0.108–0.256) among men, and 50.2 versus 26.3% (RD = 0.239, 95% CI: 0.155–0.322) versus 14.0% (RD = 0.362, 95% CI: 0.286–0.439) among women. Non-inferiority of the intervention was inconclusive (i.e. the CI included 0.15) among men whereas inferiority was declared among women. The incidence of anxiety was higher in the intervention group than that of the control groups especially among men aged 30 and older and among women aged 25 and older. No difference existed in childbearing desires between groups after exposure.

          LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

          The possibility of selection bias associated with the use of SRPs (higher socioeconomic status and education) and volunteer bias toward those more interested in fertility may limit the generalizability of these findings.

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

          In addition to education targeting a younger generation, psychological approaches are needed to alleviate possible anxiety caused by fertility information.

          STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

          This study was funded by National Center for Child Health and Development, Seiiku Medical Study Grant (24-6), the Daiwa Foundation Small Grants and Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (26-1591). No competing interest declared.

          TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

          UMIN Clinical Trials Registry. Trial registration number, 000016168.

          TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

          13 January 2015.

          DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

          15 January 2015.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fertility and ageing.

          The late 20th century trend to delay birth of the first child until the age at which female fecundity or reproductive capacity is lower has increased the incidence of age-related infertility. The trend and its consequences have also stimulated interest in the possible factors in the female and the male that may contribute to the decline in fecundity with age; in the means that exist to predict fecundity; and in the consequences for pregnancy and childbirth. In the female, the number of oocytes decreases with age until the menopause. Oocyte quality also diminishes, due in part to increased aneuploidy because of factors such as changes in spindle integrity. Although older male age affects the likelihood of conception, abnormalities in sperm chromosomes and in some components of the semen analysis are less important than the frequency of intercourse. Age is as accurate as any other predictor of conception with assisted reproductive technology. The decline in fecundity becomes clinically relevant when women reach their mid-30s, when even assisted reproduction treatment cannot compensate for the decline in fecundity associated with delaying attempts at conceiving. Pregnancies among women aged >40 years are associated with more non-severe complications, more premature births, more congenital malformations and more interventions at birth.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students.

            In the USA, the postponement of childbearing reflects contemporary social norms of delaying marriage, pursing educational goals and securing economic stability prior to attempting conception. Although university students are more likely to delay childbearing, it is unclear to what extent they are aware of age-related fertility decline. The current study is the first of its kind to assess fertility awareness and parenting attitudes of American undergraduate university students. Two-hundred forty-six randomly selected undergraduate university students (138 females and 108 males) completed an online self-report survey adapted from the Swedish Fertility Awareness Questionnaire. Students were evenly distributed between the freshman, sophomore, junior and senior classes with a mean age of 20.4 years. Participants wanted to have their first and last child within the window of a woman's fertility. However, participants demonstrated a lack of fertility awareness by vastly overestimating the age at which women experience declines in fertility, the likelihood of pregnancy following unprotected intercourse and the chances that IVF treatments would be successful in the case of infertility. Nearly 9 in 10 participants want to have children in the future and viewed parenthood as a highly important aspect of their future lives. Delaying childbearing based on incorrect perceptions of female fertility could lead to involuntary childlessness. Education regarding fertility issues is necessary to help men and women make informed reproductive decisions that are based on accurate information rather than incorrect perceptions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting.

              V Covello (2001)
              The intentional or unintentional introduction of a pathogen in an urban setting presents severe communication challenges. Risk communication--a science-based approach for communicating effectively in high-concern situations--provides a set of principles and tools for meeting those challenges. A brief overview of the risk communication theoretical perspective and basic risk communication models is presented here, and the risk communication perspective is applied to the West Nile virus epidemic in New York City in 1999 and 2000 and to a possible bioterrorist event. The purpose is to provide practical information on how perceptions of the risks associated with a disease outbreak might be perceived and how communications would be best managed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Reprod
                Hum. Reprod
                humrep
                humrep
                Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1161
                1460-2350
                September 2016
                19 August 2016
                19 August 2016
                : 31
                : 9
                : 2051-2060
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine , Akita 010-8543, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
                [3 ]Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University , Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
                [4 ]Department of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Sports and Health Sciences, Daito Bunka University , Saitama 355-8501, Japan
                [5 ]Center of Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development , Tokyo 157-0074, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence address. E-mail: saitou-hi@ 123456ncchd.go.jp
                Article
                dew133
                10.1093/humrep/dew133
                4991656
                27301362
                9f965a7a-c1c8-4f15-96bd-c8a70ede7f0d
                © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 28 April 2016
                : 28 April 2016
                : 17 May 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Child Health and Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007786;
                Award ID: 24-6
                Funded by: Daiwa Foundation Small Grant;
                Award ID: 26-1591
                Categories
                Original Article
                Psychology and Counselling

                Human biology
                fertility,awareness,risk communication,anxiety,education
                Human biology
                fertility, awareness, risk communication, anxiety, education

                Comments

                Comment on this article