Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using the Clinical Frailty Scale in Allocating Scarce Health Care Resources

      article-commentary
      , MD 1 , , , PhD 1 , 2
      Canadian Geriatrics Journal
      Canadian Geriatrics Society
      frailty, Clinical Frailty Scale, ageing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The key idea behind the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is that, as people age, they are more likely to have things wrong with them. Those things they have wrong (health deficits) can, as they accumulate, erode their ability to do the high order functions which define their overall health. These high order functions include being able to: think and do as they please; look after themselves; interact with other people; and move about without falling. The Clinical Frailty Scale brings that information together in one place. This paper is a guide for people new to the Clinical Frailty Scale. It also introduces an updated version (CFS version 2.0), with revised level names (e.g., “vulnerable” becomes “living with very mild frailty”) and minor edits to level descriptions. The key points discussed are that the Clinical Frailty Scale assays the baseline state, it is not widely validated in younger people or those with stable single-system disabilities, and it requires clinical judgement. The Clinical Frailty Scale is now commonly used as a triage tool to make important clinical decisions such as allocating scarce health care resources for COVID-19 management; therefore, it is important that the scale is used appropriately.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region — Case Series

          Abstract Background Community transmission of coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) was detected in the state of Washington in February 2020. Methods We identified patients from nine Seattle-area hospitals who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical data were obtained through review of medical records. The data reported here are those available through March 23, 2020. Each patient had at least 14 days of follow-up. Results We identified 24 patients with confirmed Covid-19. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 64±18 years, 63% were men, and symptoms began 7±4 days before admission. The most common symptoms were cough and shortness of breath; 50% of patients had fever on admission, and 58% had diabetes mellitus. All the patients were admitted for hypoxemic respiratory failure; 75% (18 patients) needed mechanical ventilation. Most of the patients (17) also had hypotension and needed vasopressors. No patient tested positive for influenza A, influenza B, or other respiratory viruses. Half the patients (12) died between ICU day 1 and day 18, including 4 patients who had a do-not-resuscitate order on admission. Of the 12 surviving patients, 5 were discharged home, 4 were discharged from the ICU but remained in the hospital, and 3 continued to receive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Conclusions During the first 3 weeks of the Covid-19 outbreak in the Seattle area, the most common reasons for admission to the ICU were hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring vasopressor treatment, or both. Mortality among these critically ill patients was high. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Age-related deficit accumulation and the diseases of ageing

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The role of illness acuity on the association between frailty and mortality in emergency department patients referred to internal medicine

              Abstract Background we investigated whether two frailty tools predicted mortality among emergency department (ED) patients referred to internal medicine and how the level of illness acuity influenced any association between frailty and mortality. Methods two tools, embedded in a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), were the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and a 57-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI-CGA). Illness acuity was assessed using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). We examined all-cause 30-day and 6-month mortality and time to death. Results in 808 ED patients (mean age ± SD 80.8 ± 8.8, 54.4% female), the mean FI-CGA score was 0.44 ± 0.14, and the CFS was 5.6 ± 1.6. A minority (307; 38%) were classified as having high acuity (CTAS: 1–2). The 30-day mortality rate was 17%; this increased to 34% at 6 months. Compared to well patients with low acuity, the risk of 30-day mortality was 22.5 times (95% CI: 9.35–62.12) higher for severely frail patients with high acuity; 53% of people with very severe frailty (CFS = 8) and high acuity died within 30 days. When acuity was low, the risk for 30-day mortality was significantly higher only among those with very high levels of frailty (CFS 7–9, FI-CGA > 0.5). When acuity was high, even lower levels of frailty (CFS 5–6, FI-CGA 0.4–0.5) were associated with higher 30-day mortality. Conclusions across levels of frailty, higher acuity increased mortality risk. When acuity was low, the risk was significant only when the degree of frailty was high, whereas when acuity was high, even lower levels of frailty were associated with greater mortality risk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Can Geriatr J
                Can Geriatr J
                Canadian Geriatrics Journal
                Canadian Geriatrics Society
                1925-8348
                September 2020
                01 September 2020
                : 23
                : 3
                : 210-215
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University
                [2 ]School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Kenneth Rockwood, md, Suite 1421 Veterans Memorial Bldg., 5955 Veterans Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E1, E-mail: kenneth.rockwood@ 123456dal.ca
                Article
                cgj-23-210
                10.5770/cgj.23.463
                7458601
                32904824
                9f06786a-b870-4b8d-b995-23c6ff37cb3e
                © 2020 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Commentaries

                Geriatric medicine
                frailty,clinical frailty scale,ageing
                Geriatric medicine
                frailty, clinical frailty scale, ageing

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content392

                Cited by241

                Most referenced authors174