5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human Interleukin-1 β Profile and Self-Reported Pain Monitoring Using Clear Aligners with or without Acceleration Techniques: A Case Report and Investigational Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          There is a growing demand for more aesthetic, comfortable, and faster orthodontic treatments, and clear aligners emerged as a solution to fulfill this need. However, the effectiveness of clear aligners to treat complex malocclusions is yet contentious. The use of acceleration methods could improve the efficacy of clear aligners by stimulating cells' mechanobiology through numerous pathways, but this hypothesis is still poorly explored.

          Objective

          We aimed to monitor the release profile of an inflammatory marker-the interleukin-1 β-and to evaluate its relationship with self-reported pain scores with and without the use of acceleration techniques during an orthodontic treatment requiring difficult tooth movements with clear aligners. Case Report. Here, we report a case of a 46-year-old female patient who presented functional and aesthetic complaints. Intraoral examination revealed a diminished overjet and overbite, rotation of teeth 45 and 24, absence of teeth 25, 35, and 36, buccolingual dislocation of tooth 21, a tendency to a Class III malocclusion, and a 2 mm left deviation of the lower midline. This study is divided into three stimulation phases: no stimulation, mechanical vibration stimulation, and photobiomodulation. Interleukin-1 β levels in gingival crevicular fluid samples from the pressure side of six selected teeth were evaluated at four time points after the orthodontic treatment onset. Pain monitoring in those teeth was performed using a visual analogue scale at the same time points.

          Results

          Interleukin-1 β protein production peaked 24 h after treatment onset. Complex movements were associated with increased self-reported pain.

          Conclusion

          Clear aligners show limitations in solving complex tooth movements, even when combined with acceleration. The development of customized and programmable stimulation microdevices integrated into “smart aligners,” which could be designed to specifically stimulate the direction of movement and stimulation parameters and could constitute a solution to optimize the orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force.

            Remodeling changes in paradental tissues are considered essential in effecting orthodontic tooth movement. The force-induced tissue strain produces local alterations in vascularity, as well as cellular and extracellular matrix reorganization, leading to the synthesis and release of various neurotransmitters, cytokines, growth factors, colony-stimulating factors, and metabolites of arachidonic acid. Recent research in the biological basis of tooth movement has provided detailed insight into molecular, cellular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic forces. Although many studies have been reported in the orthodontic and related scientific literature, a concise convergence of all data is still lacking. Such an amalgamation of the rapidly accumulating scientific information should help orthodontic clinicians and educators understand the biological processes that underlie the phenomenon of tooth movement with mechanics (removable, fixed, or functional appliances). This review aims to achieve this goal and is organized to include all major findings from the beginning of research in the biology of tooth movement. It highlights recent developments in cellular, molecular, tissue, and genetic reactions in response to orthodontic force application. It reviews briefly the processes of bone, periodontal ligament, and gingival remodeling in response to orthodontic force. This review also provides insight into the biological background of various deleterious effects of orthodontic forces.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign.

              The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of tooth movement with removable polyurethane aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif). The study sample included 37 patients treated with Anterior Invisalign. Four hundred one anterior teeth (198 maxillary and 203 mandibular) were measured on the virtual Treat models. The virtual model of the predicted tooth position was superimposed over the virtual model of the achieved tooth position, created from the posttreatment impression, and the 2 models were superimposed over their stationary posterior teeth by using ToothMeasure, Invisalign's proprietary superimposition software. The amount of tooth movement predicted was compared with the amount achieved after treatment. The types of movements studied were expansion, constriction, intrusion, extrusion, mesiodistal tip, labiolingual tip, and rotation. The mean accuracy of tooth movement with Invisalign was 41%. The most accurate movement was lingual constriction (47.1%), and the least accurate movement was extrusion (29.6%)- specifically, extrusion of the maxillary (18.3%) and mandibular (24.5%) central incisors, followed by mesiodistal tipping of the mandibular canines (26.9%). The accuracy of canine rotation was significantly lower than that of all other teeth, with the exception of the maxillary lateral incisors. At rotational movements greater than 15 degrees, the accuracy of rotation for the maxillary canines fell significantly. Lingual crown tip was significantly more accurate than labial crown tip, particularly for the maxillary incisors. There was no statistical difference in accuracy between maxillary and mandibular teeth of the same tooth type for any movements studied. We still have much to learn regarding the biomechanics and efficacy of the Invisalign system. A better understanding of Invisalign's ability to move teeth might help the clinician select suitable patients for treatment, guide the proper sequencing of movement, and reduce the need for case refinement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Dent
                Int J Dent
                ijd
                International Journal of Dentistry
                Hindawi
                1687-8728
                1687-8736
                2022
                31 August 2022
                : 2022
                : 8252696
                Affiliations
                1UNIPRO—Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, Porto, Portugal
                2Center for Microelectromechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, Campus Azurém, Braga, Portugal
                3LABBELS—Associate Laboratory, Braga, Guimarães, Portugal
                4ICVS/3B's—PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga, Guimarães, Portugal
                5UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Portugal
                6TOXRUN—Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences, CESPU, CRL, Gandra, Portugal
                7IBMC—Instituto Biologia Molecular e Celular, I3S—Inst Inovação e Investigação em Saúde, Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Giuseppe Minervini

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9665-7183
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-5385
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-452X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-5910
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-6237
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-8739
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-8038
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-6626
                Article
                10.1155/2022/8252696
                10287526
                9ef8637f-b940-4be1-a5d2-b00a80aeb59e
                Copyright © 2022 Selma Pascoal et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 June 2022
                : 10 August 2022
                : 11 August 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: CESPU
                Award ID: OrthoAlign-PI-4RL-CESPU-2019
                Funded by: National FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia)
                Award ID: SFRH/BD/09375/2020
                Award ID: UI/BD/150951/2021
                Award ID: UIDB/04436/2020
                Award ID: UIDP/04436/2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                Dentistry
                Dentistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article