26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Agriculture is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and must feature in efforts to reduce emissions. Organic farming might contribute to this through decreased use of farm inputs and increased soil carbon sequestration, but it might also exacerbate emissions through greater food production elsewhere to make up for lower organic yields. To date there has been no rigorous assessment of this potential at national scales. Here we assess the consequences for net GHG emissions of a 100% shift to organic food production in England and Wales using life-cycle assessment. We predict major shortfalls in production of most agricultural products against a conventional baseline. Direct GHG emissions are reduced with organic farming, but when increased overseas land use to compensate for shortfalls in domestic supply are factored in, net emissions are greater. Enhanced soil carbon sequestration could offset only a small part of the higher overseas emissions.

          Abstract

          The greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of organic methods is poorly understood. Here, the authors assess the GHG impact of a 100% shift to organic food production in England and Wales and find that direct GHG emissions are reduced with organic farming, but when increased land use abroad to allow for production shortfalls is factored in, GHG emissions are elevated well-above the baseline.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture.

          Numerous reports have emphasized the need for major changes in the global food system: agriculture must meet the twin challenge of feeding a growing population, with rising demand for meat and high-calorie diets, while simultaneously minimizing its global environmental impacts. Organic farming—a system aimed at producing food with minimal harm to ecosystems, animals or humans—is often proposed as a solution. However, critics argue that organic agriculture may have lower yields and would therefore need more land to produce the same amount of food as conventional farms, resulting in more widespread deforestation and biodiversity loss, and thus undermining the environmental benefits of organic practices. Here we use a comprehensive meta-analysis to examine the relative yield performance of organic and conventional farming systems globally. Our analysis of available data shows that, overall, organic yields are typically lower than conventional yields. But these yield differences are highly contextual, depending on system and site characteristics, and range from 5% lower organic yields (rain-fed legumes and perennials on weak-acidic to weak-alkaline soils), 13% lower yields (when best organic practices are used), to 34% lower yields (when the conventional and organic systems are most comparable). Under certain conditions—that is, with good management practices, particular crop types and growing conditions—organic systems can thus nearly match conventional yields, whereas under others it at present cannot. To establish organic agriculture as an important tool in sustainable food production, the factors limiting organic yields need to be more fully understood, alongside assessments of the many social, environmental and economic benefits of organic farming systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978-2003.

            More than twice as much carbon is held in soils as in vegetation or the atmosphere, and changes in soil carbon content can have a large effect on the global carbon budget. The possibility that climate change is being reinforced by increased carbon dioxide emissions from soils owing to rising temperature is the subject of a continuing debate. But evidence for the suggested feedback mechanism has to date come solely from small-scale laboratory and field experiments and modelling studies. Here we use data from the National Soil Inventory of England and Wales obtained between 1978 and 2003 to show that carbon was lost from soils across England and Wales over the survey period at a mean rate of 0.6% yr(-1) (relative to the existing soil carbon content). We find that the relative rate of carbon loss increased with soil carbon content and was more than 2% yr(-1) in soils with carbon contents greater than 100 g kg(-1). The relationship between rate of carbon loss and carbon content is irrespective of land use, suggesting a link to climate change. Our findings indicate that losses of soil carbon in England and Wales--and by inference in other temperate regions-are likely to have been offsetting absorption of carbon by terrestrial sinks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                g.kirk@cranfield.ac.uk
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                22 October 2019
                22 October 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 4641
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0679 2190, GRID grid.12026.37, School of Water, Energy & Environment, , Cranfield University, ; Cranfield, MK43 0AL UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2186 5933, GRID grid.417905.e, School of Agriculture, Food and Environment, , Royal Agricultural University, ; Cirencester, GL7 6JS UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0457 9566, GRID grid.9435.b, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, , University of Reading, ; PO Box 237, Reading, RG6 6AR UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-9288
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7739-9772
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-5424
                Article
                12622
                10.1038/s41467-019-12622-7
                6805889
                31641128
                9ed0cb62-aab1-4acb-b561-54911ff37067
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 May 2018
                : 23 September 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000266, RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC);
                Award ID: WG17023N
                Award ID: WG17023N
                Award ID: WG17023N
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ratcliff Foundation Woodlands Earls Common Road, Stock Green Redditch, Worcestershire B96 6TB
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                agroecology,environmental impact,agriculture
                Uncategorized
                agroecology, environmental impact, agriculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article