25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Vaccines and allergic reactions: The past, the current COVID‐19 pandemic, and future perspectives

      review-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 15 , 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 1 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 10 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 10 , 1 , 14 ,
      Allergy
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      allergy, anaphylaxis, COVID‐19, SARS‐CoV‐2, vaccine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vaccines are essential public health tools with a favorable safety profile and prophylactic effectiveness that have historically played significant roles in reducing infectious disease burden in populations, when the majority of individuals are vaccinated. The COVID‐19 vaccines are expected to have similar positive impacts on health across the globe. While serious allergic reactions to vaccines are rare, their underlying mechanisms and implications for clinical management should be considered to provide individuals with the safest care possible. In this review, we provide an overview of different types of allergic adverse reactions that can potentially occur after vaccination and individual vaccine components capable of causing the allergic adverse reactions. We present the incidence of allergic adverse reactions during clinical studies and through post‐authorization and post‐marketing surveillance and provide plausible causes of these reactions based on potential allergenic components present in several common vaccines. Additionally, we review implications for individual diagnosis and management and vaccine manufacturing overall. Finally, we suggest areas for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references143

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report

          Abstract Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and spread globally, prompting an international effort to accelerate development of a vaccine. The candidate vaccine mRNA-1273 encodes the stabilized prefusion SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Methods We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label trial including 45 healthy adults, 18 to 55 years of age, who received two vaccinations, 28 days apart, with mRNA-1273 in a dose of 25 μg, 100 μg, or 250 μg. There were 15 participants in each dose group. Results After the first vaccination, antibody responses were higher with higher dose (day 29 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay anti–S-2P antibody geometric mean titer [GMT], 40,227 in the 25-μg group, 109,209 in the 100-μg group, and 213,526 in the 250-μg group). After the second vaccination, the titers increased (day 57 GMT, 299,751, 782,719, and 1,192,154, respectively). After the second vaccination, serum-neutralizing activity was detected by two methods in all participants evaluated, with values generally similar to those in the upper half of the distribution of a panel of control convalescent serum specimens. Solicited adverse events that occurred in more than half the participants included fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and pain at the injection site. Systemic adverse events were more common after the second vaccination, particularly with the highest dose, and three participants (21%) in the 250-μg dose group reported one or more severe adverse events. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; mRNA-1273 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04283461).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial

            Background With the unprecedented morbidity and mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, a vaccine against COVID-19 is urgently needed. We investigated CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China), an inactivated vaccine candidate against COVID-19, containing inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), for its safety, tolerability and immunogenicity. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial, healthy adults aged 18–59 years were recruited from the community in Suining County of Jiangsu province, China. Adults with SARS-CoV-2 exposure or infection history, with axillary temperature above 37·0°C, or an allergic reaction to any vaccine component were excluded. The experimental vaccine for the phase 1 trial was manufactured using a cell factory process (CellSTACK Cell Culture Chamber 10, Corning, Wujiang, China), whereas those for the phase 2 trial were produced through a bioreactor process (ReadyToProcess WAVE 25, GE, Umea, Sweden). The phase 1 trial was done in a dose-escalating manner. At screening, participants were initially separated (1:1), with no specific randomisation, into two vaccination schedule cohorts, the days 0 and 14 vaccination cohort and the days 0 and 28 vaccination cohort, and within each cohort the first 36 participants were assigned to block 1 (low dose CoronaVac [3 μg per 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide diluent per dose) then another 36 were assigned to block 2 (high-dose Coronavc [6 μg per 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide diluent per dse]). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (2:1), using block randomisation with a block size of six, to either two doses of CoronaVac or two doses of placebo. In the phase 2 trial, at screening, participants were initially separated (1:1), with no specific randomisation, into the days 0 and 14 vaccination cohort and the days 0 and 28 vaccination cohort, and participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1), using block randomisation with a block size of five, to receive two doses of either low-dose CoronaVac, high-dose CoronaVac, or placebo. Participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after injection in all participants who were given at least one dose of study drug (safety population). The primary immunogenic outcome was seroconversion rates of neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 at day 14 after the last dose in the days 0 and 14 cohort, and at day 28 after the last dose in the days 0 and 28 cohort in participants who completed their allocated two-dose vaccination schedule (per-protocol population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352608, and is closed to accrual. Findings Between April 16 and April 25, 2020, 144 participants were enrolled in the phase 1 trial, and between May 3 and May 5, 2020, 600 participants were enrolled in the phase 2 trial. 743 participants received at least one dose of investigational product (n=143 for phase 1 and n=600 for phase 2; safety population). In the phase 1 trial, the incidence of adverse reactions for the days 0 and 14 cohort was seven (29%) of 24 participants in the 3 ug group, nine (38%) of 24 in the 6 μg group, and two (8%) of 24 in the placebo group, and for the days 0 and 28 cohort was three (13%) of 24 in the 3 μg group, four (17%) of 24 in the 6 μg group, and three (13%) of 23 in the placebo group. The seroconversion of neutralising antibodies on day 14 after the days 0 and 14 vaccination schedule was seen in 11 (46%) of 24 participants in the 3 μg group, 12 (50%) of 24 in the 6 μg group, and none (0%) of 24 in the placebo group; whereas at day 28 after the days 0 and 28 vaccination schedule, seroconversion was seen in 20 (83%) of 24 in the 3 μg group, 19 (79%) of 24 in the 6 μg group, and one (4%) of 24 in the placebo group. In the phase 2 trial, the incidence of adverse reactions for the days 0 and 14 cohort was 40 (33%) of 120 participants in the 3 μg group, 42 (35%) of 120 in the 6 μg group, and 13 (22%) of 60 in the placebo group, and for the days 0 and 28 cohort was 23 (19%) of 120 in the 3 μg group, 23 (19%) of 120 in the 6 μg group, and 11 (18%) of 60 for the placebo group. Seroconversion of neutralising antibodies was seen for 109 (92%) of 118 participants in the 3 μg group, 117 (98%) of 119 in the 6 μg group, and two (3%) of 60 in the placebo group at day 14 after the days 0 and 14 schedule; whereas at day 28 after the days 0 and 28 schedule, seroconversion was seen in 114 (97%) of 117 in the 3 μg group, 118 (100%) of 118 in the 6 μg group, and none (0%) of 59 in the placebo group. Interpretation Taking safety, immunogenicity, and production capacity into account, the 3 μg dose of CoronaVac is the suggested dose for efficacy assessment in future phase 3 trials. Funding Chinese National Key Research and Development Program and Beijing Science and Technology Program.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months

              SARS-CoV-2 antibodies persist As the number of daily COVID-19 cases continues to mount worldwide, the nature of the humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains uncertain. Wajnberg et al. used a cohort of more than 30,000 infected individuals with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms to determine the robustness and longevity of the anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. They found that neutralizing antibody titers against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein persisted for at least 5 months after infection. Although continued monitoring of this cohort will be needed to confirm the longevity and potency of this response, these preliminary results suggest that the chance of reinfection may be lower than is currently feared. Science, this issue p. 1227
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                knadeau@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Allergy
                Allergy
                10.1111/(ISSN)1398-9995
                ALL
                Allergy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0105-4538
                1398-9995
                04 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 76
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/all.v76.6 )
                : 1640-1660
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University Stanford CA USA
                [ 2 ] Departmentt of Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation KU Leuven Catholic University of Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 3 ] Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology Institute for Clinical Science Skane University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden
                [ 4 ] Department of Clinical Pharmacy &Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Respiratory Medicine First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic
                [ 6 ] Department of Pediatrics and Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin Center for Vaccination in Special Situations University Hospital in Martin Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia
                [ 7 ] Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD USA
                [ 8 ] Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
                [ 9 ] Transylvania University Brasov Romania
                [ 10 ] Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University Zurich Zurich Switzerland
                [ 11 ] Departamento de CienciasMédicasBásicas Facultad de Medicina Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA) Universidad San Pablo‐CEU CEU Universities Madrid España
                [ 12 ] Instituto de Salud Carlos III RETIC ARADYAL Madrid Spain
                [ 13 ] Division of Medical Biotechnology Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 14 ] Department of Medicine Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
                [ 15 ] School of Medicine University CEU San Pablo Madrid Spain
                [ 16 ] Department of Medicine Division of Hospital Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
                [ 17 ] Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
                [ 18 ] Translational Medicine Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
                [ 19 ] Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
                [ 20 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 21 ] Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Health Melbourne Vic Australia
                [ 22 ] Department of Infection and Immunity Luxembourg Institute of Health Esch‐sur‐Alzette Luxembourg
                [ 23 ] Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis Odense University Hospital University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
                [ 24 ] Department of Medicine and School of Microbiology APC Microbiome Ireland University College Cork Cork Ireland
                [ 25 ] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology School of Chemistry Complutense University Madrid Spain
                [ 26 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
                [ 27 ] Department of Paediatrics Allergy and Clinical Immunology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
                [ 28 ] Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
                [ 29 ] Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Imperial College London London UK
                [ 30 ] Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
                [ 31 ] Allergy Unit Malaga Regional University Hospital‐UMA‐ARADyAL Málaga Spain
                [ 32 ] Department of Environmental Medicine Medical Faculty University Augsburg Augsburg Germany
                [ 33 ] Institute of Environmental Medicine Helmholtz Zentrum München German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg Germany
                [ 34 ] Department of Immunology and Pathology Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
                [ 35 ] Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Alfred Health Melbourne VIC Australia
                [ 36 ] Department of Otolaryngology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
                [ 37 ] Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kari C. Nadeau, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Biomedical Innovations Building (BMI), 240 Pasteur Drive, Room#1755, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

                Email: knadeau@ 123456stanford.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-0100
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-2523
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-364X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0554-9943
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5488-5700
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-8689
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-4256
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-7829
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4852-229X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-7595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-3583
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-0369
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-9639
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8745-0228
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-3463
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-471X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-5179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-1919
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0909-2963
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-9884
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-019X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-2955
                Article
                ALL14840
                10.1111/all.14840
                8251022
                33811364
                9e8b4664-72a7-42b3-b20b-f8bddd425905
                © 2021 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 23 March 2021
                : 07 February 2021
                : 28 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 9, Pages: 21, Words: 14334
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:02.07.2021

                Immunology
                allergy,anaphylaxis,covid‐19,sars‐cov‐2,vaccine
                Immunology
                allergy, anaphylaxis, covid‐19, sars‐cov‐2, vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article