27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e286">Question</h5> <p id="d362417e288">Is the receipt of a preferred treatment associated with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e291">Findings</h5> <p id="d362417e293">This systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 randomized clinical trials involving 5294 participants with a mental health diagnosis found that receiving preferred psychosocial mental health treatment was associated with lower dropout rates and had a medium positive association with therapeutic alliance. There was no evidence of a significant association with clinical outcomes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e296">Meaning</h5> <p id="d362417e298">Offering patients with a mental health diagnosis their preferred treatment is associated with important aspects of engagement in psychosocial interventions; these findings strengthen existing policy and guidance on ensuring informed treatment choice in mental health care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e303">Importance</h5> <p id="d362417e305">Receiving a preferred treatment has previously been associated with lower dropout rates and better clinical outcomes, but this scenario has not been investigated specifically for psychosocial interventions for patients with a mental health diagnosis. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e308">Objective</h5> <p id="d362417e310">To assess the association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions via a systematic review and meta-analysis. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e313">Data Sources</h5> <p id="d362417e315">The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Nice HDAS (Healthcare Databases Advanced Search), Google Scholar, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), Semantic Scholar, and OpenGrey were searched from inception to July 20, 2018, and updated on June 10, 2019. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e318">Study Selection</h5> <p id="d362417e320">Studies were eligible if they (1) were a randomized clinical trial; (2) involved participants older than 18 years; (3) involved participants with mental health diagnoses; (4) reported data from a group of participants who received their preferred treatment and a group who received their nonpreferred treatment or who were not given a choice; and (5) offered at least 1 psychosocial intervention. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e323">Data Extraction and Synthesis</h5> <p id="d362417e325">Two researchers extracted study data for attendance, dropout, and clinical outcomes independently. Both assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e328">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d362417e330">The following 7 outcomes were examined: attendance, dropout, therapeutic alliance, depression and anxiety outcomes, global outcomes, treatment satisfaction, and remission. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e333">Results</h5> <p id="d362417e335">A total of 7341 articles were identified, with 34 eligible for inclusion. Twenty-nine articles were included in the meta-analyses comprising 5294 participants. Receiving a preferred psychosocial mental health treatment had a medium positive association with dropout rates (relative risk, 0.62; 0.48-0.80; <i>P</i> &lt; .001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 44.6%) and therapeutic alliance (Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.48; 0.15-0.82; <i>P</i> = .01; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 20.4%). There was no evidence of a significant association with other outcomes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi190081-11"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d362417e360">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d362417e362">This is the first review, to our knowledge, examining the association of receiving a preferred psychosocial mental health treatment with both engagement and outcomes for patients with a mental health diagnosis. Patients with mental health diagnoses who received their preferred treatment demonstrated a lower dropout rate from treatment and higher therapeutic alliance scores. These findings underline the need to accommodate patient preference in mental health services to maximize treatment uptake and reduce financial costs of premature dropout and disengagement. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d362417e365">This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Premature discontinuation in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analysis.

          Premature discontinuation from therapy is a widespread problem that impedes the delivery of otherwise effective psychological interventions. The most recent comprehensive review found an average dropout rate of 47% across 125 studies (Wierzbicki & Pekarik, 1993); however, given a number of changes in the field over the past 2 decades, an updated meta-analysis is needed to examine the current phenomenon of therapy dropout. A series of meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted in order to identify the rate at which treatment dropout occurs and predictors of its occurrence. This review included 669 studies representing 83,834 clients. Averaging across studies using a random effects model, the weighted dropout rate was 19.7%, 95% CI [18.7%, 20.7%]. Further analyses, also using random effects models, indicated that the overall dropout rate was moderated by client diagnosis and age, provider experience level, setting for the intervention, definition of dropout, type of study (efficacy vs. effectiveness), and other design variables. Dropout was not moderated by orientation of therapy, whether treatment was provided in an individual or group format, and a number of client demographic variables. Although premature discontinuation is occurring at a lower rate than what was estimated 20 years ago (Wierzbicki & Pekarik, 1993), it is still a significant problem, with about 1 in every 5 clients dropping out of therapy. Special efforts should be made to decrease premature discontinuation, particularly with clients who are younger, have a personality or eating disorder diagnosis, and are seen by trainee clinicians. © 2012 American Psychological Association
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes

            Psychotherapies may work through techniques that are specific to each therapy or through factors that all therapies have in common. Proponents of the common factors model often point to meta-analyses of comparative outcome studies that show all therapies have comparable effects. However, not all meta-analyses support the common factors model; the included studies often have several methodological problems; and there are alternative explanations for finding comparable outcomes. To date, research on the working mechanisms and mediators of therapies has always been correlational, and in order to establish that a mediator is indeed a causal factor in the recovery process of a patient, studies must show a temporal relationship between the mediator and an outcome, a dose–response association, evidence that no third variable causes changes in the mediator and the outcome, supportive experimental research, and have a strong theoretical framework. Currently, no common or specific factor meets these criteria and can be considered an empirically validated working mechanism. Therefore, it is still unknown whether therapies work through common or specific factors, or both.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis.

              Prior meta-analyses have found a moderate but robust relationship between alliance and outcome across a broad spectrum of treatments, presenting concerns, contexts, and measurements. However, there continues to be a lively debate about the therapeutic role of the alliance, particularly in treatments that are tested using randomized clinical trial (RCT) designs. The purpose of this present study was to examine whether research design, type of treatment, or author's allegiance variables, alone or in combination, moderate the relationship between alliance and outcome. Multilevel longitudinal analysis was used to investigate the following moderators of the alliance-outcome correlation: (a) research design (RCT or other), (b) use of disorder-specific manuals, (c) specificity of outcomes, (d) cognitive and/or behavioral therapy (CBT) or other types of treatments, (e) researcher allegiance, and (f) time of alliance assessment. RCT, disorder-specific manual use, specificity of primary and secondary outcomes, and CBT did not moderate the alliance-outcome correlation. Early alliance-outcome correlations were slightly higher in studies conducted by investigators with specific interest in alliance than were those in studies conducted by researchers without such an allegiance. Over the course of therapy, these initial differences disappeared. Apart from this trend, none of the variables previously proposed as potential moderators or mediators of the alliance-outcome relation, alone or in combination, were found to have a mediating impact. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-622X
                December 04 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
                Article
                10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750
                6902231
                31799994
                9e62d191-d50d-429a-a46a-67b18a59f3ea
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article