8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Fertility Outcomes Following Combined Clomiphene and Letrozole Versus Letrozole Therapy for the Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Subfertility

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Poly Cystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) affects 8-13%  of women in their reproductive age and is one of the foremost causes of female subfertility. Traditionally, clomiphene citrate has been the first-line treatment for ovulation induction in PCOS. However, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) international evidence-based guidelines in 2018 recommended the use of letrozole as first-line therapy for ovulation induction in anovulatory PCOS women, due to better pregnancy and live birth rates. Here we aimed to evaluate the effect of combined - clomiphene and letrozole versus letrozole for the treatment of PCOS subfertility.

          Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted on reproductive-age women fulfilling Rotterdam Criteria for PCOS with a history of subfertility. All participants receiving at least one cycle of letrozole and clomiphene combination were recruited as cases. However, women receiving letrozole only for ovulation induction were taken as controls. Hospital records were abstracted for data on baseline characteristics such as age, duration of infertility, PCOS phenotype, body mass index (BMI), past medical and fertility history, treatment with ovulation induction agents, and metformin use. The mean size of the largest follicle, number of dominant follicles of size greater than 15 mm and endometrial thickness on Days 12-14 or on the day of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge were recorded. A cycle was termed ovulatory if serum progesterone levels were > 5.0 ng/ml on the seventh day after the LH surge or day 22 in the absence of the LH surge. Data pertaining to therapy-associated side effects were also abstracted from the clinical records.

          Results: Amongst the ovulatory cycles in both groups, there was no significant difference in the day of the LH surge. Serum progesterone levels on the seventh day post-ovulation were higher with combination therapy (19.35 v/s 26.71, p=0.004). The number of ovulatory cycles was also greater with combination therapy, but the difference was just short of significant (25 vs 18, p=0.08). The mean diameter of the largest follicle, incidence of multi-follicular ovulation, and thin endometrium were similar in both groups. The adverse effect profile was similar in both groups.

          Conclusion: Combination treatment of clomiphene citrate with letrozole may potentially improve fertility outcomes in PCOS subfertility in terms of the likelihood of ovulation and higher post-ovulatory progesterone levels, however, larger studies are required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome

          (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome † ‡

            Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the recommended assessment and management of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), based on the best available evidence, clinical expertise and consumer preference? SUMMARY ANSWER International evidence-based guidelines, including 166 recommendations and practice points, addressed prioritized questions to promote consistent, evidence-based care and improve the experience and health outcomes of women with PCOS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous guidelines either lacked rigorous evidence-based processes, did not engage consumer and international multidisciplinary perspectives, or were outdated. Diagnosis of PCOS remains controversial, and assessment and management are inconsistent. The needs of women with PCOS are not being adequately met and evidence practice gaps persist. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION International evidence-based guideline development engaged professional societies and consumer organizations with multidisciplinary experts and women with PCOS directly involved at all stages. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II-compliant processes were followed, with extensive evidence synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied across evidence quality, feasibility, acceptability, cost, implementation and ultimately recommendation strength. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Governance included a six continent international advisory and a project board, five guideline development groups, and consumer and translation committees. Extensive health professional and consumer engagement informed guideline scope and priorities. Engaged international society-nominated panels included pediatrics, endocrinology, gynecology, primary care, reproductive endocrinology, obstetrics, psychiatry, psychology, dietetics, exercise physiology, public health and other experts, alongside consumers, project management, evidence synthesis and translation experts. In total, 37 societies and organizations covering 71 countries engaged in the process. Twenty face-to-face meetings over 15 months addressed 60 prioritized clinical questions involving 40 systematic and 20 narrative reviews. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and approved via consensus voting within the five guideline panels, modified based on international feedback and peer review, with final recommendations approved across all panels. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The evidence in the assessment and management of PCOS is generally of low to moderate quality. The guideline provides 31 evidence based recommendations, 59 clinical consensus recommendations and 76 clinical practice points all related to assessment and management of PCOS. Key changes in this guideline include: (i) considerable refinement of individual diagnostic criteria with a focus on improving accuracy of diagnosis; (ii) reducing unnecessary testing; (iii) increasing focus on education, lifestyle modification, emotional wellbeing and quality of life; and (iv) emphasizing evidence based medical therapy and cheaper and safer fertility management. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Overall evidence is generally low to moderate quality, requiring significantly greater research in this neglected, yet common condition, especially around refining specific diagnostic features in PCOS. Regional health system variation is acknowledged and a process for guideline and translation resource adaptation is provided. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The international guideline for the assessment and management of PCOS provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences. Research recommendations have been generated and a comprehensive multifaceted dissemination and translation program supports the guideline with an integrated evaluation program. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The guideline was primarily funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) supported by a partnership with ESHRE and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guideline development group members did not receive payment. Travel expenses were covered by the sponsoring organizations. Disclosures of conflicts of interest were declared at the outset and updated throughout the guideline process, aligned with NHMRC guideline processes. Full details of conflicts declared across the guideline development groups are available at https://www.monash.edu/medicine/sphpm/mchri/pcos/guideline in the Register of disclosures of interest. Of named authors, Dr Costello has declared shares in Virtus Health and past sponsorship from Merck Serono for conference presentations. Prof. Laven declared grants from Ferring, Euroscreen and personal fees from Ferring, Euroscreen, Danone and Titus Healthcare. Prof. Norman has declared a minor shareholder interest in an IVF unit. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The guideline was peer reviewed by special interest groups across our partner and collaborating societies and consumer organizations, was independently assessed against AGREE-II criteria, and underwent methodological review. This guideline was approved by all members of the guideline development groups and was submitted for final approval by the NHMRC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              What is the reported overall prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to the criteria of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rotterdam or the Androgen Excess and PCOS Society (AE-PCOS Society)?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                11 May 2023
                May 2023
                : 15
                : 5
                : e38886
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Obstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND
                [2 ] Obstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, IND
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.38886
                10257441
                37303342
                9e625613-a83e-40d8-aa39-b11341a878bc
                Copyright © 2023, Sharma et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 May 2023
                Categories
                Obstetrics/Gynecology
                Quality Improvement
                Epidemiology/Public Health

                ovulation induction,clomiphene citrate,letrozole,subfertility,polycystic ovarian syndrome

                Comments

                Comment on this article