7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consensus on the treatment of vitiligo – Brazilian Society of Dermatology ☆☆

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Vitiligo is a muco-cutaneous, autoimmune, localized, or disseminated disease, which manifests through hypochromic or achromic macules, with loss in quality of life. The prevalence of vitiligo in Brazil was determined to be 0.54%. There is no on-label medication for its treatment. To date, no Brazilian consensus on the treatment of vitiligo had been written.

          Objectives

          The objective of this group of Brazilian dermatologists with experience in the treatment of this disease was to reach a consensus on the clinical and surgical treatment of vitiligo, based on articles with the best scientific evidence.

          Methods

          Seven dermatologists were invited, and each was assigned two treatment modalities to review. Each treatment (topical, systemic, and phototherapy) was reviewed by three experts. Two experts reviewed the surgical treatment. Subsequently, the coordinator compiled the different versions and drafted a text about each type of treatment. The new version was returned to all experts, who expressed their opinions and made suggestions for clarity. The final text was written by the coordinator and sent to all participants to prepare the final consensus.

          Results/Conclusion

          The experts defined the following as standard treatments of vitiligo: the use of topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors for localized and unstable cases; corticosteroid minipulse in progressive generalized vitiligo; narrowband UVB phototherapy for extensive forms of the disease. Surgical modalities should be indicated for segmental and stable generalized vitiligo. Topical and systemic anti-JAK drugs are being tested, with promising results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references164

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference.

          During the 2011 International Pigment Cell Conference (IPCC), the Vitiligo European Taskforce (VETF) convened a consensus conference on issues of global importance for vitiligo clinical research. As suggested by an international panel of experts, the conference focused on four topics: classification and nomenclature; definition of stable disease; definition of Koebner's phenomenon (KP); and 'autoimmune vitiligo'. These topics were discussed in seven working groups representing different geographical regions. A consensus emerged that segmental vitiligo be classified separately from all other forms of vitiligo and that the term 'vitiligo' be used as an umbrella term for all non-segmental forms of vitiligo, including 'mixed vitiligo' in which segmental and non-segmental vitiligo are combined and which is considered a subgroup of vitiligo. Further, the conference recommends that disease stability be best assessed based on the stability of individual lesions rather than the overall stability of the disease as the latter is difficult to define precisely and reliably. The conference also endorsed the classification of KP for vitiligo as proposed by the VETF (history based, clinical observation based, or experimentally induced). Lastly, the conference agreed that 'autoimmune vitiligo' should not be used as a separate classification as published evidence indicates that the pathophysiology of all forms of vitiligo likely involves autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures.

            Treatment with oral corticosteroids is known to decrease bone density but there are few data on the attendant risk of fracture and on the reversibility of this risk after cessation of therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a general medical practice setting in the United Kingdom (using data from the General Practice Research Database [GPRD]). For each oral corticosteroid user aged 18 years or older, a control patient was selected randomly, who was matched by age, sex, and medical practice. The study comprised 244,235 oral corticosteroid users and 244,235 controls. The average age was 57.1 years in the oral corticosteroid cohort and 56.9 years in the control cohort. In both cohorts 58.6% were female. The most frequent indication for treatment was respiratory disease (40%). The relative rate of nonvertebral fracture during oral corticosteroid treatment was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.38), that of hip fracture 1.61 (1.47-1.76), that of forearm fracture 1.09 (1.01-1.17), and that of vertebral fracture 2.60 (2.31-2.92). A dose dependence of fracture risk was observed. With a standardized daily dose of less than 2.5 mg prednisolone, hip fracture risk was 0.99 (0.82-1.20) relative to control, rising to 1.77 (1.55-2.02) at daily doses of 2.5-7.5 mg, and 2.27 (1.94-2.66) at doses of 7.5 mg or greater. For vertebral fracture, the relative rates were 1.55 (1.20-2.01), 2.59 (2.16-3.10), and 5.18 (4.25-6.31), respectively. All fracture risks declined toward baseline rapidly after cessation of oral corticosteroid treatment. These results quantify the increased fracture risk during oral corticosteroid therapy, with greater effects on the hip and spine than forearm. They also suggest a rapid offset of this increased fracture risk on cessation of therapy, which has implications for the use of preventative agents against bone loss in patients at highest risk.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the management of vitiligo: the European Dermatology Forum consensus.

              The aetiopathogenic mechanisms of vitiligo are still poorly understood, and this has held back progress in diagnosis and treatment. Up until now, treatment guidelines have existed at national levels, but no common European viewpoint has emerged. This guideline for the treatment of segmental and nonsegmental vitiligo has been developed by the members of the Vitiligo European Task Force and other colleagues. It summarizes evidence-based and expert-based recommendations (S1 level).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                An Bras Dermatol
                An Bras Dermatol
                Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
                Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia
                0365-0596
                1806-4841
                10 October 2020
                Nov-Dec 2020
                10 October 2020
                : 95
                : Suppl 1
                : 70-82
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dermatology, Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
                [b ]Department of Dermatology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [c ]Department of Dermatology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
                [d ]Department of Dermatology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
                [e ]Private Clinic, Salvador, BA, Brazil
                [f ]Department of Dermatology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
                [g ]Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. caio.castro@ 123456pucpr.br
                Article
                S0365-0596(20)30236-1
                10.1016/j.abd.2020.05.007
                7772607
                33153826
                9dca9c92-2b86-4c0c-a61b-7ce8601f2ede
                © 2020 Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 2 March 2020
                : 15 May 2020
                Categories
                Special Article

                clinical protocols,combined modality therapy,consensus,treatment outcome,vitiligo

                Comments

                Comment on this article