For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
13
views
139
references
 Top references
cited by
42
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      397
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity–Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scholarship examining the usefulness of community-engaged research (CEnR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) for eliminating health inequities. This article seeks to synthesize the extant literature of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other related reviews regarding the context, processes, and research designs and interventions underlying CEnR that optimize its effectiveness. Through a scoping review, we have utilized an empirically derived framework of CBPR to map this literature and identify key findings and priorities for future research. Our study found 100 reviews of CEnR that largely support the CBPR conceptual framework.

          Related collections

          Most cited references139

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Adrian Aldcroft, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin … (2018)
          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
          Article 0 comments Cited 7630 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

            Sherry Arnstein (1969)
            Article 0 comments Cited 950 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity.

              Nina Wallerstein, Bonnie Duran (2010)
              Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged in the last decades as a transformative research paradigm that bridges the gap between science and practice through community engagement and social action to increase health equity. CBPR expands the potential for the translational sciences to develop, implement, and disseminate effective interventions across diverse communities through strategies to redress power imbalances; facilitate mutual benefit among community and academic partners; and promote reciprocal knowledge translation, incorporating community theories into the research. We identify the barriers and challenges within the intervention and implementation sciences, discuss how CBPR can address these challenges, provide an illustrative research example, and discuss next steps to advance the translational science of CBPR.
              Article 0 comments Cited 530 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-journal-id): 8006431
                Journal ID (pubmed-jr-id): 1309
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Annu Rev Public Health
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Annu Rev Public Health
                Title: Annual review of public health
                ISSN (Print): 0163-7525
                ISSN (Electronic): 1545-2093
                Publication date Nihms-submitted: 29 April 2021
                Publication date (Electronic): 10 January 2020
                Publication date (Print): 02 April 2020
                Publication date PMC-release: 04 May 2021
                Volume: 41
                Pages: 177-199
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
                [2 ]College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
                [3 ]Institute for the Study of “Race” and Social Justice, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
                [4 ]Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, 3240 Hamilton, New Zealand
                [5 ]Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest (BHRCS), Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA
                [6 ]Center for Social Policy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
                [7 ]School of Public Administration, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                Manuscript ID: NIHMS1551334
                DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
                PMC ID: 8095013
                PubMed ID: 31922931
                SO-VID: 9da574f6-4f49-45b6-9803-13a2c3698051
                License:

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See credit lines of images or other third-party material in this article for license information.

                History
                Categories
                Subject: Article

                Keywords: community-based participatory research,cbpr,community-engaged research,cenr,participatory action research,par,participatory health research,community–academic partnerships,caps,research-to-practice partnerships,rpps,cbpr conceptual model
                Data availability:
                Keywords: community-based participatory research, cbpr, community-engaged research, cenr, participatory action research, par, participatory health research, community–academic partnerships, caps, research-to-practice partnerships, rpps, cbpr conceptual model

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content397

                See all similar

                Cited by40

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors1,802

                See all reference authors