2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Use of kinetic data to model potential antioxidant activity: Radical scavenging capacity of Australian Eucalyptus honeys

      , , , ,
      Food Chemistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: A critical review and results

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Advantages and limitations of common testing methods for antioxidants.

              Owing to the importance of antioxidants in the protection of both natural and man-made materials, a large variety of testing methods have been proposed and applied. These include methods based on inhibited autoxidation studies, which are better followed by monitoring the kinetics of oxygen consumption or of the formation of hydroperoxides, the primary oxidation products. Analytical determination of secondary oxidation products (e.g. carbonyl compounds) has also been used. The majority of testing methods, however, do not involve substrate autoxidation. They are based on the competitive bleaching of a probe (e.g. ORAC assay, β-carotene, crocin bleaching assays, and luminol assay), on reaction with a different probe (e.g. spin-trapping and TOSC assay), or they are indirect methods based on the reduction of persistent radicals (e.g. galvinoxyl, DPPH and TEAC assays), or of inorganic oxidizing species (e.g. FRAP, CUPRAC and Folin-Ciocalteu assays). Yet other methods are specific for preventive antioxidants. The relevance, advantages, and limitations of these methods are critically discussed, with respect to their chemistry and the mechanisms of antioxidant activity. A variety of cell-based assays have also been proposed, to investigate the biological activity of antioxidants. Their importance and critical aspects are discussed, along with arguments for the selection of the appropriate testing methods according to the different needs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Chemistry
                Food Chemistry
                Elsevier BV
                03088146
                April 2021
                April 2021
                : 342
                : 128332
                Article
                10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128332
                9d3770ce-6c13-4357-8542-d57d206f8230
                © 2021

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article