12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Activation of MET pathway predicts poor outcome to cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Activation of the MET oncogene promotes tumor growth, invasion and metastasis in several tumor types. Additionally, MET is activated as a compensatory pathway in the presence of EGFR blockade, thus resulting in a mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibitors.

          Methods

          We have investigated the impact of HGF and MET expression, MET activation (phosphorylation), MET gene status, and MET-activating mutations on cetuximab sensitivity in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) patients.

          Results

          A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed in 57 patients. MET overexpression was detected in 58 % patients, MET amplification in 39 % and MET activation (p-MET) in 30 %. Amplification was associated with MET overexpression. Log-rank testing showed significantly worse outcomes in recurrent/metastatic, MET overexpressing patients for progression-free survival and overall survival. Activation of MET was correlated with worse PFS and OS. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, p-MET was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. HGF overexpression was observed in 58 % patients and was associated with MET phosphorylation, suggesting a paracrine activation of the receptor.

          Conclusions

          HGF/MET pathway activation correlated with worse outcome in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC patients. When treated with a cetuximab-based regimen, these patients correlated with worse outcome. This supports a dual blocking strategy of HGF/MET and EGFR pathways for the treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0633-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidermal growth factor receptor biology in head and neck cancer.

            Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in several epithelial malignancies, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which exhibits EGFR overexpression in up to 90% of tumors. EGFR ligands such as transforming growth factor alpha are also overexpressed in HNSCC. EGFR plays a critical role in HNSCC growth, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. However, EGFR inhibitors as monotherapy have yielded only modest clinical outcomes. Potential mechanisms for lack of response to EGFR inhibition in HNSCC include constitutive activation of signaling pathways independent of EGFR, as well as genetic aberrations causing dysregulation of the cell cycle. EGFR-directed therapy may be optimized by identifying and selecting those HNSCC patients most likely to benefit from EGFR inhibition. Resistance to EGFR inhibition may be circumvented by combination therapy employing EGFR inhibitors together with other treatment modalities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

              Therapy of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck results in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 months. These cancers are rich in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We wished to determine whether the addition of cetuximab, which inhibits activation of EGFR, would improve PFS. Patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin every 4 weeks, with weekly cetuximab (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Tumor tissue was assayed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points of interest were response rate, toxicity, overall survival, and correlation of EGFR with clinical end points. There were 117 analyzable patients enrolled. Median PFS was 2.7 months for arm B and 4.2 months for arm A. The hazard ratio for progression of arm A to arm B was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.12). Median overall survival was 8.0 months for arm B and 9.2 months for arm A (P = .21). The hazard ratio for survival by skin toxicity in cetuximab-treated patients was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86). Objective response rate was 26% [corrected] for arm A and 10% [corrected] for arm B (P = .03). Enhancement of response was greater for patients with EGFR staining present in less than 80% of cells. Addition of cetuximab to cisplatin significantly improves response rate. There was a survival advantage for the development of rash. Progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved by the addition of cetuximab in this study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +34-915504804 , JMadoz@fjd.es
                SZazo@fjd.es
                cristina.chamizo@fjd.es
                VCasado@fjd.es
                CCarames@fjd.es
                EGavin@fjd.es
                ion.cristobal@fjd.es
                jgfoncillas@fjd.es
                +34-915504804 , FRojo@fjd.es
                Journal
                J Transl Med
                J Transl Med
                Journal of Translational Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5876
                29 August 2015
                29 August 2015
                2015
                : 13
                : 282
                Affiliations
                [ ]Molecular Pathology Laboratory, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, UAM, Avda. Reyes Catolicos 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [ ]Oncology Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
                [ ]Pathology Department, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, UAM, Avda. Reyes Catolicos 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [ ]Translational Oncology Department, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, UAM, Madrid, Spain
                Article
                633
                10.1186/s12967-015-0633-7
                4552997
                26319934
                9cc32fdb-ce97-4443-9f2e-80a9250a9f23
                © Madoz-Gúrpide et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 May 2015
                : 10 August 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc),egfr,met,hgf,cetuximab,prognostic factor
                Medicine
                head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc), egfr, met, hgf, cetuximab, prognostic factor

                Comments

                Comment on this article