15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Geodetic Evidence That Mercury Has A Solid Inner Core

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Geodetic analysis of radio tracking measurements of the MESSENGER spacecraft while in orbit about Mercury has yielded new estimates for the planet’s gravity field, tidal Love number, and pole coordinates. The derived right ascension ( α = 281.0082° ± 0.0009°; all uncertainties are 3 standard deviations) and declination ( δ =61.4164° ± 0.0003°) of the spin pole place Mercury in the Cassini state. Confirmation of the equilibrium state with an estimated mean (whole-planet) obliquity ϵ of 1.968 ± 0.027 arcmin enables the confident determination of the planet’s normalized polar moment of inertia (0.333 ± 0.005), which indicates a high degree of internal differentiation. Internal structure models generated by a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo process and consistent with the geodetic constraints possess a solid inner core with a radius ( r ic ) between 0.3 and 0.7 that of the outer core ( r oc ).

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The crust of the Moon as seen by GRAIL.

          High-resolution gravity data obtained from the dual Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) spacecraft show that the bulk density of the Moon's highlands crust is 2550 kilograms per cubic meter, substantially lower than generally assumed. When combined with remote sensing and sample data, this density implies an average crustal porosity of 12% to depths of at least a few kilometers. Lateral variations in crustal porosity correlate with the largest impact basins, whereas lateral variations in crustal density correlate with crustal composition. The low-bulk crustal density allows construction of a global crustal thickness model that satisfies the Apollo seismic constraints, and with an average crustal thickness between 34 and 43 kilometers, the bulk refractory element composition of the Moon is not required to be enriched with respect to that of Earth.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The major-element composition of Mercury's surface from MESSENGER X-ray spectrometry.

            X-ray fluorescence spectra obtained by the MESSENGER spacecraft orbiting Mercury indicate that the planet's surface differs in composition from those of other terrestrial planets. Relatively high Mg/Si and low Al/Si and Ca/Si ratios rule out a lunarlike feldspar-rich crust. The sulfur abundance is at least 10 times higher than that of the silicate portion of Earth or the Moon, and this observation, together with a low surface Fe abundance, supports the view that Mercury formed from highly reduced precursor materials, perhaps akin to enstatite chondrite meteorites or anhydrous cometary dust particles. Low Fe and Ti abundances do not support the proposal that opaque oxides of these elements contribute substantially to Mercury's low and variable surface reflectance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Magnetic Field Observations near Mercury: Preliminary Results from Mariner 10

              Results are presented from a preliminary analysis of data obtained near Mercury on 29 March 1974 by the NASA-GSFC magnetic field experiment on Mariner 10. Rather unexpectedly, a very well-developed, detached bow shock wave, which develops as the super-Alfvénic solar wind interacts with the planet, has been observed. In addition, a magnetosphere-like region, with maximum field strength of 98 gammas at closest approach (704 kilometers altitude), has been observed, contained within boundaries similar to the terrestrial magnetopause. The obstacle deflecting the solar wind flow is global in size, but the origin of the enhanced magnetic field has not yet been uniquely established. The field may be intrinsic to the planet and distorted by interaction with the solar wind. It may also be associated with a complex induction process whereby the planetary interior-atmosphere-ionosphere interacts with the solar wind flow to generate the observed field by a dynamo action. The complete body of data favors the preliminary conclusion that Mercury has an intrinsic magnetic field. If this is correct, it represents a major scientific discovery in planetary magnetism and will have considerable impact on studies of the origin of the solar system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophys. Res. Lett.
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                0094-8276
                1944-8007
                April 10 2019
                April 10 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary SciencesMassachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA
                [2 ]NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA
                [3 ]Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Sapienza Univesity of Rome Rome Italy
                [4 ]Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and TechnologyUniversity of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore MD USA
                [5 ]Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary SciencesCase Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA
                [6 ]Lamont‐Doherty Earth ObservatoryColumbia University Palisades NY USA
                Article
                10.1029/2018GL081135
                6662718
                31359894
                9c28857f-7016-4ac4-b3c5-6a07a886dca1
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article