0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hypertension urgencies in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02439749) demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure (BP) after renal denervation (RDN) compared to sham control in the absence of anti-hypertensive medications. Prior to the 3-month primary endpoint, medications were immediately reinstated for patients who met escape criteria defined as office systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 180 mmHg or other safety concerns. Our objective was to compare the rate of hypertensive urgencies in RDN vs. sham control patients. Patients were enrolled with office SBP ≥ 150 and < 180 mmHg, office diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg and mean 24 h SBP ≥ 140 and < 170 mmHg. Patients had been required to discontinue any anti-hypertensive medications and were randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control. In this post-hoc analysis, cumulative incidence curves with Kaplan–Meier estimates of rate of patients meeting escape criteria were generated for RDN and sham control patients. There were 16 RDN (9.6%) and 28 sham control patients (17.0%) who met escape criteria between baseline and 3 months. There was a significantly higher rate of sham control patients meeting escape criteria compared to RDN for all escape patients ( p = 0.032), as well as for patients with a hypertensive urgency with office SBP ≥ 180 mmHg ( p = 0.046). Rate of escape was similar between RDN and sham control for patients without a measured BP exceeding 180 mmHg ( p = 0.32). In the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial, RDN patients were less likely to experience hypertensive urgencies that required immediate use of anti-hypertensive medications compared to sham control.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data.

          Reliable information about the prevalence of hypertension in different world regions is essential to the development of national and international health policies for prevention and control of this condition. We aimed to pool data from different regions of the world to estimate the overall prevalence and absolute burden of hypertension in 2000, and to estimate the global burden in 2025. We searched the published literature from Jan 1, 1980, to Dec 31, 2002, using MEDLINE, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies of retrieved articles. We included studies that reported sex-specific and age-specific prevalence of hypertension in representative population samples. All data were obtained independently by two investigators with a standardised protocol and data-collection form. Overall, 26.4% (95% CI 26.0-26.8%) of the adult population in 2000 had hypertension (26.6% of men [26.0-27.2%] and 26.1% of women [25.5-26.6%]), and 29.2% (28.8-29.7%) were projected to have this condition by 2025 (29.0% of men [28.6-29.4%] and 29.5% of women [29.1-29.9%]). The estimated total number of adults with hypertension in 2000 was 972 million (957-987 million); 333 million (329-336 million) in economically developed countries and 639 million (625-654 million) in economically developing countries. The number of adults with hypertension in 2025 was predicted to increase by about 60% to a total of 1.56 billion (1.54-1.58 billion). Hypertension is an important public-health challenge worldwide. Prevention, detection, treatment, and control of this condition should receive high priority.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

            Objective To systematically review studies quantifying the associations of long term (clinic), mid-term (home), and short term (ambulatory) variability in blood pressure, independent of mean blood pressure, with cardiovascular disease events and mortality. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science, searched to 15 February 2016 for full text articles in English. Eligibility criteria for study selection Prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in adults, except those in patients receiving haemodialysis, where the condition may directly impact blood pressure variability. Standardised hazard ratios were extracted and, if there was little risk of confounding, combined using random effects meta-analysis in main analyses. Outcomes included all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality and cardiovascular disease events. Measures of variability included standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, and average real variability, but not night dipping or day-night variation. Results 41 papers representing 19 observational cohort studies and 17 clinical trial cohorts, comprising 46 separate analyses were identified. Long term variability in blood pressure was studied in 24 papers, mid-term in four, and short-term in 15 (two studied both long term and short term variability). Results from 23 analyses were excluded from main analyses owing to high risks of confounding. Increased long term variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.22), cardiovascular disease mortality (1.18, 1.09 to 1.28), cardiovascular disease events (1.18, 1.07 to 1.30), coronary heart disease (1.10, 1.04 to 1.16), and stroke (1.15, 1.04 to 1.27). Increased mid-term and short term variability in daytime systolic blood pressure were also associated with all cause mortality (1.15, 1.06 to 1.26 and 1.10, 1.04 to 1.16, respectively). Conclusions Long term variability in blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, over and above the effect of mean blood pressure. Associations are similar in magnitude to those of cholesterol measures with cardiovascular disease. Limited data for mid-term and short term variability showed similar associations. Future work should focus on the clinical implications of assessment of variability in blood pressure and avoid the common confounding pitfalls observed to date. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014015695.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adherence in Hypertension

              The global epidemic of hypertension is largely uncontrolled and hypertension remains the leading cause of noncommunicable disease deaths worldwide. Suboptimal adherence, which includes failure to initiate pharmacotherapy, to take medications as often as prescribed, and to persist on therapy long-term, is a well-recognized factor contributing to the poor control of blood pressure in hypertension. Several categories of factors including demographic, socioeconomic, concomitant medical-behavioral conditions, therapy-related, healthcare team and system-related factors, and patient factors are associated with nonadherence. Understanding the categories of factors contributing to nonadherence is useful in managing nonadherence. In patients at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, electronic and biochemical monitoring are useful for detecting nonadherence and for improving adherence. Increasing the availability and affordability of these more precise measures of adherence represent a future opportunity to realize more of the proven benefits of evidence-based medications. In the absence of new antihypertensive drugs, it is important that healthcare providers focus their attention on how to do better with the drugs they have. This is the reason why recent guidelines have emphasize the important need to address drug adherence as a major issue in hypertension management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Michaelwebermd@cs.com
                Journal
                Clin Res Cardiol
                Clin Res Cardiol
                Clinical Research in Cardiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1861-0684
                1861-0692
                19 July 2022
                19 July 2022
                2022
                : 111
                : 11
                : 1269-1275
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.262863.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0693 2202, Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Downstate Medical Center, , SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, State University of New York, ; Brooklyn, NY USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.411668.c, ISNI 0000 0000 9935 6525, University Hospital Erlangen, ; Erlangen, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.418635.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0432 8548, Piedmont Heart Institute, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.25879.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, Perelman School of Medicine, , University of Pennsylvania, ; Philadelphia, PA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.11749.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2167 7588, Klinik Für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Des Saarlandes, , Saarland University, ; HomburgSaar, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.5216.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2155 0800, Hippocratio Hospital, , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ; Athens, Greece
                [7 ]GRID grid.410804.9, ISNI 0000000123090000, School of Medicine, , Jichi Medical University, ; Tochigi, Japan
                [8 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; London, UK
                [9 ]GRID grid.486749.0, ISNI 0000 0004 4685 2620, Baylor Research Institute, , Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, ; Dallas, TX USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.490568.6, ISNI 0000 0004 5997 482X, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, ; Stanford, CA USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.189967.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, School of Medicine, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [12 ]Medtronic PLC, Santa Rosa, CA USA
                Article
                2064
                10.1007/s00392-022-02064-5
                9622517
                35852582
                9c1d7315-98ae-484d-bfbd-7c8b7d50aacd
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 May 2022
                : 4 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004374, Medtronic;
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2022

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                hypertension,blood pressure,renal denervation,hypertensive urgency
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                hypertension, blood pressure, renal denervation, hypertensive urgency

                Comments

                Comment on this article